Re: [aur-general] Merge request

2012-03-20 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
On 20 March 2012 02:25, Schala Zeal schalaalexiaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'd like to merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56848 into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57782 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56849 into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57783

[aur-general] [libccfits] removal

2012-03-20 Thread Nico Nell
Hello, I've started maintaining ccfits (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4439) and found that there is a duplicate orphaned package called libccfits (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38912) that should probably be removed. Thanks, ~Nick

Re: [aur-general] [libccfits] removal

2012-03-20 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
On 20 March 2012 16:24, Nico Nell nico.n...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I've started maintaining ccfits (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4439) and found that there is a duplicate orphaned package called libccfits (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38912) that should probably

[aur-general] PKGBUILD with depending _pkgver

2012-03-20 Thread Maximilian Bräutigam
Hi all, recently, I wrote an ebuild where pkgver=2.4.2 but in the download link a 242 is needed. Thus, I decided to avoid any redundancy and to write _pkgver=${pkgver//\./}. The PKGBUILD is working fine but aur.archlinux.org is expanding the download link to 2.4.2//\./}. Is there a way to

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD with depending _pkgver

2012-03-20 Thread 小龙 陈
As far as I know, you'll have to write the package version twice. The AUR reads the PKGBUILD's directly, not with bash (security concerns). Right now, the AUR only supports variables with the name only (i.e. $blah or ${blah}). Regards, Xiao-Long Chen Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:44:43 +0100

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD with depending _pkgver

2012-03-20 Thread Martti Kühne
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 06:44:43PM +0100, Maximilian Bräutigam wrote: Is there a way to avoid both the redundancy and the wrong interpretation at aur.archlinux.org? This is the package we are talking about: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34230 suggestion: use the parameter

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD with depending _pkgver

2012-03-20 Thread rafael ff1
2012/3/20 Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com: On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 06:44:43PM +0100, Maximilian Bräutigam wrote: Is there a way to avoid both the redundancy and the wrong interpretation at aur.archlinux.org? This is the package we are talking about:

[aur-general] Request for Oracle package merges

2012-03-20 Thread Adam Nielsen
Hi all, This morning with the cooperation of the previous maintainer, I have adopted the out of date Oracle Instant Client packages on AUR. I would like to change the package names however, as I believe instantclient is not descriptive enough. I would like to change this to

[aur-general] [merge-request] sabnzbd-bzr to sabnzbd-git

2012-03-20 Thread Lucky
Hello, please merge the following packages, because developers switch to git. sabnzbd-bzr [1] to sabnzbd-git [2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38771 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51772

Re: [aur-general] [merge-request] sabnzbd-bzr to sabnzbd-git

2012-03-20 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 03/21/2012 06:21 AM, Lucky wrote: Hello, please merge the following packages, because developers switch to git. sabnzbd-bzr [1] to sabnzbd-git [2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38771 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51772 Done. -- Bartłomiej