[aur-general] Removal: bin32-go

2012-11-25 Thread Schala Zeal
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bin32-go/ I tried to make a package providing 32-bit capabilities for 64-bit users but it's quite clear Google Go does not like me at all.

Re: [aur-general] Request for removal

2012-11-25 Thread Felix Yan
On 11/26/2012 11:54 AM, Limao Luo wrote: > On 11/25/2012 10:50 PM, Joeny Ang wrote: >> Hello, >> >> vboxgtk-svn can now be removed. Reason: migrated to git. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Joeny (Biloky) > Well [1] should be merged into [2], but yeah. Also, it would be good to > provide links next time for the

Re: [aur-general] Request for removal

2012-11-25 Thread Limao Luo
On 11/25/2012 10:50 PM, Joeny Ang wrote: Hello, vboxgtk-svn can now be removed. Reason: migrated to git. Thanks. Joeny (Biloky) Well [1] should be merged into [2], but yeah. Also, it would be good to provide links next time for the TU's convenience. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vb

[aur-general] Request for removal

2012-11-25 Thread Joeny Ang
Hello, vboxgtk-svn can now be removed. Reason: migrated to git. Thanks. Joeny (Biloky)

Re: [aur-general] Merge caffeine into caffeine-bzr

2012-11-25 Thread 小龙 陈
Thanks a lot! > Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 13:53:19 -0800 > From: connor.be...@gmail.com > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Merge caffeine into caffeine-bzr > > On 25/11/12 12:56 PM, Limao Luo wrote: > > On 11/25/2012 03:53 PM, Connor Behan wrote: > >> On 25/11/12 12:46 PM,

Re: [aur-general] Merge caffeine into caffeine-bzr

2012-11-25 Thread Connor Behan
On 25/11/12 12:56 PM, Limao Luo wrote: > On 11/25/2012 03:53 PM, Connor Behan wrote: >> On 25/11/12 12:46 PM, 小龙 陈 wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Would it be possible to have my caffeine[1] package merged into >>> caffeine-bzr[2]. The PKGBUILDs are nearly identical and caffeine-bzr is a >>> more appropri

Re: [aur-general] Building a package from a currently installed program

2012-11-25 Thread Thorsten Töpper
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:15:05 -0500 Storm Dragon wrote: > Hi, > I have searched for this and not found anything, but it seems like it > should be possible. Is there a way to package a currently installed > program? I have a friend who is having trouble with a new Arch > install getting Orca workin

Re: [aur-general] Building a package from a currently installed program

2012-11-25 Thread Simon Stoakley
The day was 25/11/12 21:15 when , Storm Dragon had this to say..: Hi, I have searched for this and not found anything, but it seems like it should be possible. Is there a way to package a currently installed program? I have a friend who is having trouble with a new Arch install getting Orca

Re: [aur-general] Building a package from a currently installed program

2012-11-25 Thread Dave Reisner
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 04:15:05PM -0500, Storm Dragon wrote: > Hi, > I have searched for this and not found anything, but it seems like it should > be possible. Is there a way to package a currently installed program? I have > a friend who is having trouble with a new Arch install getting Orca w

[aur-general] Building a package from a currently installed program

2012-11-25 Thread Storm Dragon
Hi, I have searched for this and not found anything, but it seems like it should be possible. Is there a way to package a currently installed program? I have a friend who is having trouble with a new Arch install getting Orca working. I know for sure my version of Orca is working, so I wanted to

Re: [aur-general] Merge caffeine into caffeine-bzr

2012-11-25 Thread Limao Luo
On 11/25/2012 03:53 PM, Connor Behan wrote: > On 25/11/12 12:46 PM, 小龙 陈 wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Would it be possible to have my caffeine[1] package merged into >> caffeine-bzr[2]. The PKGBUILDs are nearly identical and caffeine-bzr is a >> more appropriate name. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Xiao-Long Chen >>

Re: [aur-general] Merge caffeine into caffeine-bzr

2012-11-25 Thread Connor Behan
On 25/11/12 12:46 PM, 小龙 陈 wrote: > Hi, > > Would it be possible to have my caffeine[1] package merged into > caffeine-bzr[2]. The PKGBUILDs are nearly identical and caffeine-bzr is a > more appropriate name. > > Thanks! > > Xiao-Long Chen > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/caffeine/ > [2

[aur-general] Merge caffeine into caffeine-bzr

2012-11-25 Thread 小龙 陈
Hi, Would it be possible to have my caffeine[1] package merged into caffeine-bzr[2]. The PKGBUILDs are nearly identical and caffeine-bzr is a more appropriate name. Thanks! Xiao-Long Chen [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/caffeine/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/caffeine-bzr/

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: pidgin-latex

2012-11-25 Thread Ike Devolder
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 07:26:49PM +0100, Michael Laß wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to request the orphanage of the package pidgin-latex: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pidgin-latex/ > > The reasons: > > - the package has been flagged out of date nearly 4 months ago > - the PKGBUILD does n

Re: [aur-general] Delete request [Nov 25]

2012-11-25 Thread Ike Devolder
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 01:26:41PM -0500, Limao Luo wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/scim-bridge/ > According to the project website [1], scim-bridge is part of stable scim > now; this package is now obsolete and can be deleted. Thanks is advance. > > [1] > http://www.scim-im.org/layou

Re: [aur-general] Merge Request [Nov 25]

2012-11-25 Thread Ike Devolder
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 10:57:33AM -0500, Limao Luo wrote: > Can the TU's merge > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ada-web-server/ > into > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ada-web-server-git/ > > (upstream changed from svn to git, and original package had wrong > nomenclature anyway) > > Tha

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: zanshin

2012-11-25 Thread Ike Devolder
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 10:44:14AM -0500, Limao Luo wrote: > On 11/25/2012 10:31 AM, Jekyll Wu wrote: > >于 2012年11月25日 19:04, Ike Devolder 写道: > >>On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 08:31:10PM +0800, Jekyll Wu wrote: > >>>于 2012年11月23日 09:36, Jekyll Wu 写道: > It is orphaned, never updated since submission,

[aur-general] Orphan request: pidgin-latex

2012-11-25 Thread Michael Laß
Hi, I would like to request the orphanage of the package pidgin-latex: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pidgin-latex/ The reasons: - the package has been flagged out of date nearly 4 months ago - the PKGBUILD does not work - correct and up-to-date PKGBUILDs were provided in the comments - I ma

[aur-general] Delete request [Nov 25]

2012-11-25 Thread Limao Luo
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/scim-bridge/ According to the project website [1], scim-bridge is part of stable scim now; this package is now obsolete and can be deleted. Thanks is advance. [1] http://www.scim-im.org/layout/set/print/news/scim_news/a_new_stable_version_has_been_released_th

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request [Nov 24]

2012-11-25 Thread Limao Luo
On 11/24/2012 10:49 PM, Felix Yan wrote: On 11/25/2012 10:45 AM, Limao Luo wrote: Just that $startdir nonsense was a pain, especially when I was using yaourt to install packages without supervision (--noconfirm). But I guess it doesn't matter to me anyway if I'm using a pre-built package. Thank

[aur-general] Merge Request [Nov 25]

2012-11-25 Thread Limao Luo
Can the TU's merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ada-web-server/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ada-web-server-git/ (upstream changed from svn to git, and original package had wrong nomenclature anyway) Thanks in advance.

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: zanshin

2012-11-25 Thread Limao Luo
On 11/25/2012 10:31 AM, Jekyll Wu wrote: 于 2012年11月25日 19:04, Ike Devolder 写道: On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 08:31:10PM +0800, Jekyll Wu wrote: 于 2012年11月23日 09:36, Jekyll Wu 写道: It is orphaned, never updated since submission, and doesn't build. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zanshin/ If anyon

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: zanshin

2012-11-25 Thread Jekyll Wu
于 2012年11月25日 19:04, Ike Devolder 写道: On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 08:31:10PM +0800, Jekyll Wu wrote: 于 2012年11月23日 09:36, Jekyll Wu 写道: It is orphaned, never updated since submission, and doesn't build. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zanshin/ If anyone wants to maintain it , I think it should

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: zanshin

2012-11-25 Thread Felix Yan
I guess the name "zanshin" could be okay if it is a product name, just like we have "mayavi" instead of "python2-mayavi" in the repos.

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: zanshin

2012-11-25 Thread Ike Devolder
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 08:31:10PM +0800, Jekyll Wu wrote: > 于 2012年11月23日 09:36, Jekyll Wu 写道: > >It is orphaned, never updated since submission, and doesn't build. > > > >https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zanshin/ > > > >If anyone wants to maintain it , I think it should be renamed to > >python2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2012-11-25 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days