Re: [aur-general] New PKGBUILD for consideration "ttf-apple"

2013-01-18 Thread Kirill Churin
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:38 PM, wrote: > Hello, > > I was messing around with my fonts today and decided to get some new ones. > There are several packages of apple fonts on the AUR but I had issues with > some of the fonts not being recognised by LibreOffice (due to it seemingly > being unable

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2013-01-18 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 34 packages missing signoffs * 30 packages older than 14 day

Re: [aur-general] TU application

2013-01-18 Thread Stéphane Gaudreault
Le 2013-01-17 14:46, Alexandre Filgueira a écrit : Hi everybody, This whole thing of becoming a TU began after talking by email with Allan about one article of his where he talked about one project of mine. He put me in contact with Evangelos Foutras to be my sponsor, and here I am trying to bec

Re: [aur-general] TU application

2013-01-18 Thread Alexandre Filgueira
On 18/01/13 13:23, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote: > What do you see for the future of the Cinnarch project after you will > be accepted as a TU? Is the project going to disappear or it will > continue in another form? I would continue with Cinnarch, mostly because has been a great font of knowledge for

[aur-general] Removal and merge request

2013-01-18 Thread Axilleas Pi
Please remove my package python2-pythondialog[0] as it is already uploaded as python2-dialog[1]. Also please merge (or remove) python2-pysendfile[2] to python2-sendfile[3]. Naming seemed redundant so I reuploaded it. Plus, Debian seems to name it python-sendfile as well[4]. I also notified the mai

Re: [aur-general] Removal and merge request

2013-01-18 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 18 January 2013 15:48, Axilleas Pi wrote: > Please remove my package python2-pythondialog[0] as it is already > uploaded as python2-dialog[1]. > > Also please merge (or remove) python2-pysendfile[2] to > python2-sendfile[3]. Naming seemed redundant so I reuploaded it. Plus, > Debian seems to na

Re: [aur-general] Merge packages

2013-01-18 Thread Hilton Medeiros
On 01/17/2013 10:44 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On 18/01/13 02:36, Jonathan Arnold wrote: >> I've created a new package[1], source-code-pro-fonts for Adobe's Source >> Code Pro font that includes both the TTF and OTF files. Can you merge >> and delete the otf-source-code-pro[2] and ttf-source-co

Re: [aur-general] TU application

2013-01-18 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
I need to thank you again for sharing archiso modifications make for Cinnarch -- they helped me a lot with doing my own bootable iso. While I'm satisfied user of Awesome/dwm and Openbox (but Xfce still rocks, Evangelos!), my family is happy with Cinnamon. I would be glad to see it our repositories

Re: [aur-general] Merge packages

2013-01-18 Thread Jonathan Arnold
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:33:43 -0200 Hilton Medeiros wrote: > On 01/17/2013 10:44 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > > On 18/01/13 02:36, Jonathan Arnold wrote: > >> I've created a new package[1], source-code-pro-fonts for Adobe's > >> Source Code Pro font that includes both the TTF and OTF files. Can

Re: [aur-general] Merge packages

2013-01-18 Thread Hilton Medeiros
On 01/18/2013 03:20 PM, Jonathan Arnold wrote: > I was the maintainer for the ttf-source-code-pro package and noticed > that Adobe had started to put both the OTF and the TTF together in the > same zip file, so I figured it would be okay to install both. > > Further investigation tells me that som

[aur-general] Disown request for package plone4

2013-01-18 Thread Jens Nazarenus
Hello, I sent an e-mail to the current maintainer of plone4 [1] and he said that I can adpot the package. He won't do any updates to the PKGBUILD anymore. the package is outdated since 2012-08-04. Thanks, Jens [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/plone4/

Re: [aur-general] TU application

2013-01-18 Thread Alexandre Filgueira
On 18/01/13 17:35, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: > Apart from maintaining Cinnamon, what would you do as Trusted User? Well, like I said I want to take some cinnamon related packages, like nemo or some applets. Keep helping if I found any bug. And then of course the regular Trusted User tasks like k

Re: [aur-general] Disown request for package plone4

2013-01-18 Thread Axilleas Pi
On 01/18/2013 10:33 PM, Jens Nazarenus wrote: > Hello, > I sent an e-mail to the current maintainer of plone4 [1] and he said that I > can adpot the package. He won't do any updates to the PKGBUILD anymore. > > the package is outdated since 2012-08-04. > > Thanks, > Jens > > [1] https://aur.archli

Re: [aur-general] Disown request for package plone4

2013-01-18 Thread Jens Nazarenus
I also wrote a mail to the maintainer of plone [1] but I have no answer yet, but ok. Your suggestion makes sense. I will wait for two weeks and if there is no answer I will write a disown request for [1] and a remove request for the package plone4 [2]. Thanks, Jens [1] https://aur.archlinux.

Re: [aur-general] Disown request for package plone4

2013-01-18 Thread Axilleas Pi
On 01/19/2013 12:25 AM, Jens Nazarenus wrote: > I also wrote a mail to the maintainer of plone [1] but I have no > answer yet, but ok. Your suggestion makes sense. > > I will wait for two weeks and if there is no answer I will write a disown > request for [1] and a remove request for the packag

Re: [aur-general] Disown request for package plone4

2013-01-18 Thread Jens Nazarenus
> On 01/19/2013 12:25 AM, Jens Nazarenus wrote: >> I also wrote a mail to the maintainer of plone [1] but I have no >> answer yet, but ok. Your suggestion makes sense. >> >> I will wait for two weeks and if there is no answer I will write a disown >> request for [1] and a remove request for th