On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 06:50:36PM +, Xyne wrote:
[...]
The distinction between active and inactive TUs is meaningless and should
be removed from the bylaws, including the definition of quorum. Quorum will
therefore be some fixed percent of all TUs. As stated in this thread, up to 1
in 3
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 09:33:34AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
[...]
It's a German idiom. http://www.dict.cc/?s=nicht+so+hei%C3%9F+gegessen
A recent research I made on this topic made it pretty clear to me that the
German idiom is a well-integrated Hungarian import.
cheers!
mar77i
On 27 July 2013 14:17, Emil Lundberg lundberg.e...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no problem, I just thought I'd suggest deletion of an orphaned,
out-of-date package [1] since there is another package
(eminent-awesome-3.5-git [2]) that provides the same functionality, has a
maintainer and is up to
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
+1. However, I would like to retain the repeated quorum offense
condition. If there are a couple of TUs that work on the AUR (as in
uploading, updating and deleting packages) and do not participate in
SVPs, they might block decisions. I think that it is important to make
Xyne wrote:
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
The clause should probably also specify that removal votes take precedence
over
any other pending votes except removal votes.
What does this mean in practice? :)
Let's say that the discussion period for a TU application begins and the vote
is scheduled to
Hello
please merge the package python-gudev-git [1] in python2-gudev-git [2]
which provides the same functionality with a better name for python2
packages.
best regards
Muflone
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-gudev-git/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-gudev-git/
On 2013-08-08 17:25 +0200
Muflone wrote:
Hello
please merge the package python-gudev-git [1] in python2-gudev-git [2]
which provides the same functionality with a better name for python2
packages.
best regards
Muflone
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-gudev-git/
[2]
