Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Honor TUs who become active/inactive during votes

2013-08-10 Thread Xyne
Xyne wrote: done In case anyone is wondering, the message seems to still be awaiting moderation. I had attached the resulting docs for those who like to read plaintext. My system reported them as under 40k so I thought it would go through, but the encoding bumped it up to 42k. Sorry for the

[aur-general] Removal request

2013-08-10 Thread Schala Zeal
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aurora-sim-optional-modules-git/ I've decided to include the optional modules in the main package for people to use or not use at their discretion.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2013-08-10 Thread Felix Yan
On Saturday, August 10, 2013 00:33:47 Schala Zeal wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aurora-sim-optional-modules-git/ I've decided to include the optional modules in the main package for people to use or not use at their discretion. Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2013-08-10 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 10 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2013-08-10 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky
On 9 August 2013 19:33, Quan Guo guots...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Lukas, I have updated the eminent-git package as instructed. Thanks Best Quan Hello Quan, thank you for your cooperation, I just merged them. Lukas

[aur-general] [tu-bylaws][PATCH]

2013-08-10 Thread Xyne
Hi, Here's a patch for the TU-bylaws that resulted from discussion in the previous thread: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-August/024745.html I hope this is in the correct format. I haven't used git send-email because I still haven't configured it and didn't want to

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Honor TUs who become active/inactive during votes

2013-08-10 Thread Florian Pritz
On 08/10/2013 09:15 AM, Xyne wrote: In case anyone is wondering, the message seems to still be awaiting moderation. This list is not activly moderated afaik. I'm just letting through your messages whenever you post about them so this discussion can go on. I'm not going to do any more

[aur-general] Deletion Request astyle-doc

2013-08-10 Thread Armin Fasold
This package is only a stub and should therefore be deleted. Documentation of Astyle is included in the astyle and astyle-svn packages. Greetings, -- Armin Fasold Twitter: @bebna Jabber: jab...@bebna.de

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request astyle-doc

2013-08-10 Thread Maxime GAUDUIN
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Armin Fasold m...@bebna.de wrote: This package is only a stub and should therefore be deleted. Documentation of Astyle is included in the astyle and astyle-svn packages. Greetings, -- Armin Fasold Twitter: @bebna Jabber: jab...@bebna.de Gone, thx.

[aur-general] Deletion request

2013-08-10 Thread Nikos Theodorou
Please delete my package ttf-enoriakagr, since the whole domain that contained the fonts is gone and I can't find them anywhere else (a shame really, some of them were quite good). https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-enoriakaneagr/ Thanks -- Νίκος Θεοδώρου «Ἀγεωμέτρητος μηδεὶς εἰσίτω!»

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2013-08-10 Thread Maxime GAUDUIN
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Νίκος Θεοδώρου gordo...@freemail.grwrote: Please delete my package ttf-enoriakagr, since the whole domain that contained the fonts is gone and I can't find them anywhere else (a shame really, some of them were quite good).

[aur-general] Merge request

2013-08-10 Thread Armin K.
Hi, please merge [1] into [2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libclc/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libclc-svn/

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for [linux-xen]

2013-08-10 Thread Evan Teitelman
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 17:09:16 -0400, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote: Does it? Linux no longer requires patching to work with Xen. The x86_64 repo kernel is configured for both domU and dom0 support. The i686 repo kernel is not configured for either. I was under the impression that it was.

Re: [aur-general] Merge request

2013-08-10 Thread Ike Devolder
Op zaterdag 10 augustus 2013 19:09:46 schreef Armin K.: Hi, please merge [1] into [2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libclc/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libclc-svn/ merged because upstream provides sources in svn and git. so the packages are practically the same. since

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws][PATCH]

2013-08-10 Thread Rashif Ray Rahman
On 9 August 2013 19:29, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: ... * remove distinction between active and inactive TUs So now what happens when so-called active or inactive TUs do not vote and prevent quorum from being established? No action is taken? I see these changes cover disappearing TUs, but not