[aur-general] Merge request: projectm-jack

2013-11-02 Thread Allen Li
It is possible to merge projectm-jack in the AUR with the one in community? I am the maintainer for the package in the AUR, and there's no need for it anymore since it is in community. Allen

Re: [aur-general] Request Remove: lua52-socket

2013-11-02 Thread Xyne
On 2013-11-02 16:28 +0100 SpinFlo wrote: >Hi > >please remove > >https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua52-socket/ > >this package is include in [community] > >greetings done, thanks

Re: [aur-general] disown request: ruby-ruby_parser

2013-11-02 Thread Xyne
On 2013-11-02 11:19 -0400 Jeremy Audet wrote: >Hi, > >Please disown ruby-ruby_parser. [1] I emailed the maintainer about his >package on November 19th (exactly two weeks ago), flagged his package out >of date over two weeks ago, and commented on his package over two weeks >ago. I've received no re

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD regression for espeakup

2013-11-02 Thread Xyne
Storm Dragon wrote: >Nov 01 23:18:44 dungeon-master systemd[1]: espeakup@en-us.service: main >process exited, code=exited, status=2/INVALIDARGUMENT >Nov 01 23:18:44 dungeon-master systemd[1]: Unit espeakup@en-us.service entered >failed state. >Nov 01 23:18:44 dungeon-master systemd[1]: espeakup@

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD for zetacoin-qt-git

2013-11-02 Thread Bruno Jimenez
> You're right, the v shouldn't be there, so strip it. Just add s/^v// to the > sed command. > > The pkgver functions in the Wiki are just suggestions, they need customized > for the individual repo you're using. Ok, added it, and now the version is just 0.8.2.r218.g5eed859. If you say it's OK

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD for zetacoin-qt-git

2013-11-02 Thread Jeremy Audet
Thanks for your input, Doug. I didn't know that letters were verboten. Other than that one issue, the PKGBUILD looks great to me. On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Bruno Jimenez wrote: > Hi, > > Updated version of the PKGBUILD: http://pastebin.com/LRyYqpuZ > > > Whoops, I misread the PKGBUILD. I

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD for zetacoin-qt-git

2013-11-02 Thread Doug Newgard
> From: brunoji...@gmail.com > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 17:21:36 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD for zetacoin-qt-git > > Hi, > > Updated version of the PKGBUILD: http://pastebin.com/LRyYqpuZ > >> Whoops, I misread the

[aur-general] Delete requests: libfm-qt / libfm-qt-git

2013-11-02 Thread Jerome Leclanche
For the time being, the library is not available standalone and is shipped as part of pcmanfm-qt. I'll reupload it once it's been split off. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libfm-qt/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libfm-qt-git/ J. Leclanche

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD for zetacoin-qt-git

2013-11-02 Thread Bruno Jimenez
Hi, Updated version of the PKGBUILD: http://pastebin.com/LRyYqpuZ > Whoops, I misread the PKGBUILD. Ignore my suggestion. No, you do not need > to add zetacoin-qt-git.install to the `source` and `sha256sums` arrays. Ok, nothing added then. > The `pkgver` you added is OK, but it could be better.

[aur-general] Request Remove: lua52-socket

2013-11-02 Thread SpinFlo
Hi please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua52-socket/ this package is include in [community] greetings

[aur-general] disown request: ruby-ruby_parser

2013-11-02 Thread Jeremy Audet
Hi, Please disown ruby-ruby_parser. [1] I emailed the maintainer about his package on November 19th (exactly two weeks ago), flagged his package out of date over two weeks ago, and commented on his package over two weeks ago. I've received no response. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD for zetacoin-qt-git

2013-11-02 Thread Jeremy Audet
>> 1. Add zetacoin-qt.desktop to the `source` and `sha256sums` arrays. >They were already added, do you mean zetacoin-qt-git.install? Whoops, I misread the PKGBUILD. Ignore my suggestion. No, you do not need to add zetacoin-qt-git.install to the `source` and `sha256sums` arrays. >> 2. Add a funct

Re: [aur-general] disown request: mingw-w64-libxml2

2013-11-02 Thread Jeremy Audet
At the risk of stepping in a TU's territory: When did you email the maintainer? The comments on that page do show an interest in maintaining the package (thank you), but they do not indicate that the maintainer was ever emailed about the state of his package. --Jeremy "Ichimonji10" Audet On Sat

Re: [aur-general] disown request: mingw-w64-libxml2

2013-11-02 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 2 November 2013 11:01, xantares 09 wrote: > Hello, > This package really need a fix regarding pacman changes and the last update > dates back from july, despite our mails and aur comments: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-libxml2/ > xan. Its maintainer is active; his last vote o

[aur-general] disown request: mingw-w64-libxml2

2013-11-02 Thread xantares 09
Hello, This package really need a fix regarding pacman changes and the last update dates back from july, despite our mails and aur comments: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-libxml2/ xan.

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2013-11-02 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days