Hi,
The packages kcm-grub2[1] and kcm-grub2-git[2] are both orphans and
there doesn't look to be any active development on the program. The
PKGBUILD's need updating to compile properly. There is an alternative
available in the AUR that has active development. (grub2-editor[3]) For
that
Hi,
I have a question about custom licences.
- my package is named gnuplot-nox (that is, gnuplot with far less
dependencies)
- the wiki (
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards#Licenses)
states that I should place the custom licence in
/usr/share/licence/$pkgname/.
I think
Em 18/11/2013 09:08, JoKoT3 escreveu:
Hi,
I have a question about custom licences.
- my package is named gnuplot-nox (that is, gnuplot with far less
dependencies)
- the wiki (
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards#Licenses)
states that I should place the custom licence
well spotted misspelling, but his question was to put license file into
/usr/share/licenses/gnuplot{,-nox}.
i suppose you could try adding a symlink from gnuplot-nox to gnuplot, so
namcap complains no more.
quite some other packages do that as well.
georg
Em 18/11/2013 09:27, G. Schlisio escreveu:
well spotted misspelling, but his question was to put license file
into /usr/share/licenses/gnuplot{,-nox}.
i suppose you could try adding a symlink from gnuplot-nox to gnuplot,
so namcap complains no more.
quite some other packages do that as well.
Thanks,
the typo is just in my mail, the PKGBUILD is correct (OT: according to
wikipedia, license is used in american english but licence is used in
all other english speaking countries. In french the word is also
licence... my brain hurts).
I agree that it is more a philosophical question than
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:23 PM, JoKoT3 jok...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks,
the typo is just in my mail, the PKGBUILD is correct (OT: according to
wikipedia, license is used in american english but licence is used in
all other english speaking countries. In french the word is also
licence... my
do you have a PKGBUILD in mind that does a symlink ? I'm looking for
the right way to do it.
please refrain from top posting, as there is a bottom post policy here.
first package i encountered is extra/nvidia-utils [0] (PKGBUILD can be
retrieved via abs [1])
there you find
install -D -m644
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:57 PM, G. Schlisio g.schli...@dukun.de wrote:
do you have a PKGBUILD in mind that does a symlink ? I'm looking for the
right way to do it.
please refrain from top posting, as there is a bottom post policy here.
first package i encountered is extra/nvidia-utils [0]
the same is done for a lot of lib32-packages in multilib.
even if you still get a warning from namcap, this looks like a nice,
clean and commonly accepted solution to me.
Both solutions look nice, clean and are commonly accepted. The important
question is what the purpose behind
On 18/11/13 16:02, Nowaker wrote:
the same is done for a lot of lib32-packages in multilib.
even if you still get a warning from namcap, this looks like a nice,
clean and commonly accepted solution to me.
Both solutions look nice, clean and are commonly accepted. The
important question is
first package i encountered is extra/nvidia-utils [0] (PKGBUILD can be
retrieved via abs [1]) there you find
install -D -m644 LICENSE ${pkgdir}/usr/share/licenses/nvidia/LICENSE
ln -s nvidia ${pkgdir}/usr/share/licenses/nvidia-utils
the same is done for a lot of lib32-packages in multilib.
Hi
please delete
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vapoursynth-plugin-vsremovedirt-git/
the source project is renamed to RemoveDirtVS
greetings
Hello,
some people mourned on AUR that a package that I maintain
(adopted from other peoples) does not use staticlibs option.
before they mentioned it I didn't knew about it.
Is this a new PKGBUILD-option, or did I just have not seen it before?
What does this option do?
I found the
hi,
Could someone please orphan mingw-w64-proj[1] and mingw-w64-uriparser[2]. I
emailed the maintainer on Oct 31 and have not received a response from him.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-proj
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-uriparser
-ant32
On 18 November 2013 20:45, oliver oli...@first.in-berlin.de wrote:
Hello,
some people mourned on AUR that a package that I maintain
(adopted from other peoples) does not use staticlibs option.
before they mentioned it I didn't knew about it.
Is this a new PKGBUILD-option, or did I just
You're so deep.
(sic! ref: [0])
cheers!
mar77i
[0] http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1311/18114.html
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Kyle k...@gmx.ca wrote:
If someone has just joined the list and wants to read all the previous
messages on a specific topic, I believe this list has an archive
17 matches
Mail list logo
