I don't fully understand the logic in currently having an .AURINFO
instead of defining the .SRCINFO format right now and have a tool
generating those for the time being (since it'll likely be the same
format as .PKGINFO). It can go in makepkg later.
J. Leclanche
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:12 PM,
On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 at 23:49:39, Justin Dray wrote:
> [...]
> It might also be a good idea to write out what fields are available and
> their purpose on the wiki similar to the PKGBUILD page (
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD) and perhaps link to it from
> the AUR user guidelines pag
On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 at 21:17:29, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> [...]
> So the official goal is to have it generated as part of makepkg -S?
Yes, but the requirements for makepkg(8) inclusion are much higher than
what we need for the AUR and it doesn't look like there is someone who
wants to deal with t
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Lukas Fleischer
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 at 15:51:48, Anton Larionov wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I was under the impression that .AURINFO was introduced to override some
> >> fields in PKGBUILD w
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Lukas Fleischer
wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 at 15:51:48, Anton Larionov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was under the impression that .AURINFO was introduced to override some
>> fields in PKGBUILD when they are written in format which can't be properly
>> displayed by AU
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 04:11:14PM +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 at 15:51:48, Anton Larionov wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was under the impression that .AURINFO was introduced to override some
> > fields in PKGBUILD when they are written in format which can't be properly
> > d
On 12 January 2014 23:42, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Karol Blazewicz
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman
>>> wrote:
Since there was no 'rstudio' at the time that user
On 01/12/2014 03:49 PM, Sergio Correia wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to request the 'xgraph' [1] package to be orphaned. It
> doesn't build for a few months, and I have posted an updated PKGBUILD
> in the comments in Dec 7th 2013, with no answer from the maintainer. A
> few days later (Dec 18th) I
On 01/12/2014 11:54 AM, Schala Zeal wrote:
> I came across a package in the AUR recently updated called 'weepcraft.'
> It is apparently a hacked Minecraft client, most likely intended for
> malicious purposes. Additionally, Mojang states in the Minecraft product
> not to redistribute the software,
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Karol Blazewicz
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman
>> wrote:
>>> Since there was no 'rstudio' at the time that user uploaded this one,
>>> there is no infringement of any rule
On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 at 15:51:48, Anton Larionov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was under the impression that .AURINFO was introduced to override some
> fields in PKGBUILD when they are written in format which can't be properly
> displayed by AUR (or maybe I've missed something). But why do you want to
> fo
Am 12.01.2014 16:03, schrieb Evgeniy Alekseev:
On Sunday 12 January 2014 15:55:13 Johannes Dewender wrote:
Am 12.01.2014 14:11, schrieb Evgeniy Alekseev:
On Sunday 12 January 2014 12:43:47 Johannes Dewender wrote:
Pleare remove
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cov-analysis-bin/
from the AUR.
On Sunday 12 January 2014 15:55:13 Johannes Dewender wrote:
> Am 12.01.2014 14:11, schrieb Evgeniy Alekseev:
> > On Sunday 12 January 2014 12:43:47 Johannes Dewender wrote:
> >> Pleare remove
> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cov-analysis-bin/
> >> from the AUR.
> >>
> >> I created the packa
On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 at 15:20:03, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> On 12/01/2014 14:35, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think we should promote the use of .AURINFO files. Currently, only a
> > very small fraction of packages use it. A basic description of its
> > format can be found in the co
Am 12.01.2014 14:11, schrieb Evgeniy Alekseev:
On Sunday 12 January 2014 12:43:47 Johannes Dewender wrote:
Pleare remove
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cov-analysis-bin/
from the AUR.
I created the package and was the last maintainer.
However, upstream removed any possibility to download ev
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 02:35:33PM +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we should promote the use of .AURINFO files. Currently, only a
> very small fraction of packages use it. A basic description of its
> format can be found in the commit message of AUR commit 5a11373 [1].
> Regardless
Hello,
I'd like to request the 'xgraph' [1] package to be orphaned. It
doesn't build for a few months, and I have posted an updated PKGBUILD
in the comments in Dec 7th 2013, with no answer from the maintainer. A
few days later (Dec 18th) I marked the package out-of-date and emailed
the maintainer
On 12/01/2014 14:35, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we should promote the use of .AURINFO files. Currently, only a
> very small fraction of packages use it. A basic description of its
> format can be found in the commit message of AUR commit 5a11373 [1].
> Regardless of whether we keep t
Hi,
I think we should promote the use of .AURINFO files. Currently, only a
very small fraction of packages use it. A basic description of its
format can be found in the commit message of AUR commit 5a11373 [1].
Regardless of whether we keep that format or use something entirely
different for metad
On Sunday 12 January 2014 12:43:47 Johannes Dewender wrote:
> Pleare remove
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cov-analysis-bin/
> from the AUR.
>
> I created the package and was the last maintainer.
> However, upstream removed any possibility to download even the binary of
> the tool without lo
Pleare remove
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cov-analysis-bin/
from the AUR.
I created the package and was the last maintainer.
However, upstream removed any possibility to download even the binary of
the tool without logging in.
So there is no sense to include it in the AUR anymore.
No
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 02:35:21PM +0400, Evgeniy Alekseev wrote:
> On Sunday 12 January 2014 14:31:07 Evgeniy Alekseev wrote:
> > He is not a maintainer, he is a contributor. Current mantainer's email could
> > be found in his profile [1]. And for the future. You may leave a comment on
> > package
I came across a package in the AUR recently updated called 'weepcraft.'
It is apparently a hacked Minecraft client, most likely intended for
malicious purposes. Additionally, Mojang states in the Minecraft product
not to redistribute the software, and the "Weepcraft" website apparently
does jus
On Sunday 12 January 2014 14:31:07 Evgeniy Alekseev wrote:
> He is not a maintainer, he is a contributor. Current mantainer's email could
> be found in his profile [1]. And for the future. You may leave a comment on
> package page.
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Diego
Oh, sorry. I just
Hi!
On Sunday 12 January 2014 11:14:45 Andreas Baumann wrote:
> I would like to request the 'cdp' package to be orphaned:
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cdp/
>
> I tried to contact the maintainer at 'delmon...@gmx.net', but I get
> mail delivery errors:
>
> 550 Requested action not take
Hi,
I would like to request the 'cdp' package to be orphaned:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cdp/
I tried to contact the maintainer at 'delmon...@gmx.net', but I get
mail delivery errors:
550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable [RCPT_TO]
Thanks
Andreas
--
Andreas Baumann
Tr
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 6 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 1 fully signed off package
* 69 packages missing signoffs
* 50 packages older than 14 days
27 matches
Mail list logo
