On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Karol Blazewicz <karol.blazew...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky <l.jirkov...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman <sc...@archlinux.org> >> wrote: >>> Since there was no 'rstudio' at the time that user uploaded this one, >>> there is no infringement of any rule or guideline per se. Just tell >>> them to upload an 'r-studio' to mitigate the confusion that resulted >>> from it. I don't think there is any need to merge unless there were >>> relevant comments. It is up to the maintainer to update the PKGBUILD >>> with the suggested changes. >> >> The question is whether the maintainer is still active at all. Hist >> last action is 2012-08-27 and he has only two packages, both over the >> year old with one being flagged out of date since February. >> >> Lukas > > e-mail sent. > If he doesn't respond in two weeks, maybe a TU can reupload and disown > it, or remove it from the AUR altogether, whichever is deemed the > correct action.
The maintainer has taken no action and didn't respond to my e-mail.