On 25 February 2014 10:44, Padfoot padf...@exemail.com.au wrote:
Hi,
I am the current maintainer of the AUR packages:
plymouth-release https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/plymouth-release/
plymouth-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/plymouth-git/
plymouth-release is at version 0.8.8 on
Firstly, apologies for the top post. Posting from my phone doesn't allow bottom
posting.
Yes, plymouth-git builds, but it fails to load either the drm or frame-buffer
renderers in execution causing it to fall back to text mode. I have checked my
initramfs, and all the files for plymouth are
Hey,
I'm the maintainer of the 'antichamber' package.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/antichamber/
Another guy made a duplicate called 'antichamber-hib'.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/antichamber-hib/
They both have the same function. I tried to talk to him, but sadly he
didn't reply
package name: haskell-void
package url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/haskell-void/
Package doesn't build and the maintainer hasn't responded to AUR comments.
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 19:08:44 Alexej Magura wrote:
package name: haskell-void
package url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/haskell-void/
Package doesn't build and the maintainer hasn't responded to AUR comments.
And flagged out-of-date for months, so disowned. Please adopt,
The package in question is plone-zeo [1] which has been flagged out of
date for over a year now.
I emailed the maintainer almost two weeks ago and have not heard from
him/her.
However, plone-zeo appears to be an updated copy of the plone package
[2], so I'm requesting that plone-zeo be
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 12:31:35 Ben R wrote:
The package in question is plone-zeo [1] which has been flagged out of
date for over a year now.
I emailed the maintainer almost two weeks ago and have not heard from
him/her.
However, plone-zeo appears to be an updated copy of the
