On Fri, 9/19/14, David Phillips wrote:
Subject: Re: [aur-general] AUR Best Practice for New Package Upload
To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"
Date: Friday, September 19, 2014, 8:27 AM
>makepkg doesn't
delete them. It's your
>makepkg doesn't delete them. It's your work.
Not by default, but if you call makepkg with the -c flag, it will
perform a clean-up of those temp directories.
--
David Phillips
GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B
Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF 4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B
but upstream name not necesary mean the name that the encapsulate that
contain the package need to be named.
There ar a handfull either throw arch and aur history and actual named
packages that not follow the name.
but too looking to the other packages in aur the version is alwas separate
from th
On Thu, 9/18/14, Nuno Araujo wrote:
Subject: Re: [aur-general] AUR Best Practice for New Package Upload
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Date: Thursday, September 18, 2014, 10:00 PM
As a generic advice, take the time to read the
man pages of Arch
On jeu, 2014-09-18 at 11:26 -0700, stef wrote:
>
> On Tue, 9/16/14, Nuno Araujo wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] AUR Best Practice for New Package Upload
> To: aur-general@archlinux.org
> Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2014, 1:42 PM
>
>
> Try
On Thu Sep 11 14:02:41 EDT 2014, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote:
> If look to the pther packages (not java) the fewers who need a version
they
> apend the versión at the endm so for consistency whit the all others
> packages I think is better keep the version at the end:
> --: oracle/openjdk-jre-7/8
We
On Tue, 9/16/14, Nuno Araujo wrote:
Subject: Re: [aur-general] AUR Best Practice for New Package Upload
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2014, 1:42 PM
Try to study it and feel
free to ask any questions you want about
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 14 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 1 fully signed off package
* 22 packages missing signoffs
* 5 packages older than 14 days
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
>
> And I just realized you might want to use it outside of RockboxUtility and
> create your own voice files by external means. In any case, your deps and
> makedeps are wrong, the provides line is useless, you're installing ghost
> files (the
