On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 20:29 -0400, Storm Dragon wrote:
> Howdy,
> Will all existing AUR packages be moved over? Will it be an automated
> process for existing packages? I'm wondering because there are quite
> a few unmaintained packages. If not, is there something I can do to
> help? I don't min
On Tue, 26 May 2015 at 21:03:33, Andrew Dabrowski wrote:
> I'm trying to register at aur4.archlinux.org but when I submit the form
> I get an error:
>
> "The SSH public key, **, is already in use."
>
> Since there's no place to enter my ssh public key, this seems to be an
> unsolvable chicken a
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 6 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 24 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
On Tue, 26 May 2015 at 13:33:58, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As Florian already mentioned in another email, I am away until June 1st.
> I am on a roaming data plan, so I won't be able to reply to all the
> feedback and questions on the new AUR until then. I hope that I am going
> to address a
* Gordian Edenhofer (Wed, 27 May 2015
09:37:17 +0200):
> You as a maintainer have until August 1st to upload your packages to
> AUR4 otherwise everyone may take over what you once
> maintained.
That's not entirely correct, the window is exactly one month:
* Lukas Fleischer (Sat, 23 May 2015 11:
On Sat, 23 May 2015 11:34:38 +0200
Manuel Reimer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm doing my first steps with AUR 4.0 and I'm asked to commit both,
> PKGBUILD and .SRCINFO.
>
> .SRCINFO is automatically created with "makepkg --source", but there
> is no need for a tarball when pushing to GIT. So what I t
* Jonathan Arnold (Wed, 27 May 2015 07:56:20
-0400):
> I'd be happy if there was at least a reasonable description
> of .SCRINFO on the wiki. There's a glossy version here:
>
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#AUR_metadata
>
> But there should be more, given that it is s
Is anyone interested in adopting this package? It doesn't take much to
maintain, as it hasn't been updated in awhile, but it is still very
useful to some. I no longer have an Arch installation, so maintenance is
difficult.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/extract-xiso/
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Joe Carta wrote:
> maintain
I will adopt this package gladly!
Evan
On 27-05-2015 12:23, Joe Carta wrote:
> Is anyone interested in adopting this package? It doesn't take much to
> maintain, as it hasn't been updated in awhile, but it is still very
> useful to some. I no longer have an Arch installation, so maintenance
> is difficult.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/
So you don't have to be registered to contribute a package?
On 05/27/2015 03:58 AM, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 at 21:03:33, Andrew Dabrowski wrote:
I'm trying to register at aur4.archlinux.org but when I submit the form
I get an error:
"The SSH public key, **, is already in us
On 27-05-2015 13:55, Andrew Dabrowski wrote:
> So you don't have to be registered to contribute a package?
Of course you need. There is just no point in registering on the new
aur4.archlinux.org site, since it's database will be wiped.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
On Wed, 27 May 2015 16:25:13 +0200
Marcel Korpel wrote:
> * Jonathan Arnold (Wed, 27 May 2015 07:56:20
> -0400):
> > I'd be happy if there was at least a reasonable description
> > of .SCRINFO on the wiki. There's a glossy version here:
> >
> > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Rep
* Jonathan Arnold (Wed, 27 May 2015 15:18:43
-0400):
> Well, for one, there's no mention on the wiki on how to generate this
> file. For another, it seems pretty easy to generate by hand, as the
> description indicates (nowhere does it say it gets generated).
Just use mksrcinfo from pkgbuild-intr
> Generating such a file manually is error-prone, using mksrcinfo ensures
> that the file is exactly what AURweb needs.
I believe that is what he is saying should be in the wiki. And since there
are so many questions around it this past week on the mailing list, it
might be a good idea to have it
* Justin Dray (Wed, 27 May 2015 22:36:03 +):
>> Generating such a file manually is error-prone, using mksrcinfo
>> ensures that the file is exactly what AURweb needs.
>
> I believe that is what he is saying should be in the wiki.
I understand, and I edited the wiki a bit:
https://wiki.archli
16 matches
Mail list logo
