On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini
grazzol...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
orphan and unmaintained packages anyway. I guess that if all of the Arch
users didn't needed them in more than the two months that it took to
migrate AUR3 to AUR4, it is a safe bet to say that there won't be
Em 09-08-2015 18:43, Mauro Santos escreveu:
Caring is relative, you might not care now but next week/month/year you
may need it and then you care ;)
Well, if you need in the future, perhaps you will create a new PKGBUILD
then? Relying in unmaintained packaged will most likely give you
trouble.
Well, if you need in the future, perhaps you will create a new PKGBUILD
then? Relying in unmaintained packaged will most likely give you
trouble.
I can't agree with that. If I search for something next time and it's not in
AUR4, I'd go
to AUR3, get the old PKGBUILD, update it, make sure it
On 2015-08-10 19:07, Damian Nowak wrote:
Well, if you need in the future, perhaps you will create a new
PKGBUILD
then? Relying in unmaintained packaged will most likely give you
trouble.
I can't agree with that. If I search for something next time and it's
not in AUR4, I'd go
to AUR3, get the
Em 10-08-2015 20:07, Damian Nowak escreveu:
I can't agree with that. If I search for something next time and it's not in
AUR4, I'd go
to AUR3, get the old PKGBUILD, update it, make sure it works, and then upload
to AUR4 so
others can use it too. Better than writing from scratch.
Well,
Personally, I took the opportunity to assemble a full history of the
packages I adopted, using the aur-mirror project. I figured, since part of
the purpose in migration was to allow a historical view of packages, it
made sense to include as much of that as I could.
-- Eli Schwartz
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
