I suppose some may subscribe to the view that if someone wants it
badly enough, they'll submit, maintain and stick with it.
Hi,
The thread on this list titled Deletion of orphaned packages on AUR4
may be of use to you:
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2015-August/031357.html
Thanks
David Kaylor dpkay...@gmail.com
Wrote in message:
- Second, uploading something to AUR4 then immediately orphaning it is
stupid. Why not just hold onto it for a while and look for co-maintainers,
or a new maintainer? By orphaning, you just became the thinned part of
the herd.
Just
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:30 AM, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
Kyrias deleted compiz-gtk-standalone.
You will no longer receive notifications about this package.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:32 AM, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
Kyrias deleted compiz-xfce.
You will no longer receive
A certain TU went around deleting orphaned stuff… won't name them though ;-)
Rob McCathie korr...@gmail.com
Wrote in message:
Just a query: Why were packages i added to AUR4, ensured were in good
working order (and made an enhancement to one of the packages compared
to the last release on AUR3), know are used by at least some users,
and then orphaned so some
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 17:09 Antonio Rojas aro...@archlinux.org wrote:
Rob McCathie korr...@gmail.com
Wrote in message:
Just a query: Why were packages i added to AUR4, ensured were in good
working order (and made an enhancement to one of the packages compared
to the last release on
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 07:36:53AM +, Justin Dray wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 17:09 Antonio Rojas aro...@archlinux.org wrote:
Rob McCathie korr...@gmail.com
Wrote in message:
Just a query: Why were packages i added to AUR4, ensured were in good
working order (and made an
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Bruno Pagani bruno.pag...@ens-lyon.org
wrote:
Well, the first email states Kyrias did this…
Le 11 août 2015 10:15:42 GMT+02:00, David Phillips dbphillip...@gmail.com
a écrit :
A certain TU went around deleting orphaned stuff… won't name them
though ;-)
Well, the first email states Kyrias did this…
Le 11 août 2015 10:15:42 GMT+02:00, David Phillips dbphillip...@gmail.com a
écrit :
A certain TU went around deleting orphaned stuff… won't name them
though ;-)
Am 11.08.2015 um 14:08 schrieb Simon Hanna:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 07:36:53AM +, Justin Dray wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 17:09 Antonio Rojas aro...@archlinux.org wrote:
Rob McCathie korr...@gmail.com
Wrote in message:
Just a query: Why were packages i added to AUR4, ensured were in good
On 11 Aug 2015, at 3:48 pm +0200, Johannes Dewender wrote:
[snip]
I uploaded both to AUR3 and also to AUR4.
I maintain the free branch, because I think this is the better variant.
Having the original on AUR would be good, so I also updloaded these, but
I personally don't want to maintain
Second, uploading something to AUR4 then immediately orphaning it is
stupid. Why not just hold onto it for a while and look for co-maintainers,
or a new maintainer? By orphaning, you just became the thinned part of
the herd.
Well, if it's orphaned another potential maintainer who comes across
Em 11-08-2015 02:58, Oon-Ee Ng escreveu:
Just to note on this point - some (many?) Arch users would not have
noticed anything during the migration process as their helpers would
have continued to get the old PKGBUILDs from aur.archlinux.org during
the migration process. It is only when aur4
All packages I was the maintainer of have all of a sudden disappeared. I do not
remember all the packages I adopted, but this includes 'gnome-rdp' and
'bitdefender'. Not only do I maintain zero packages now, they are not even
listed on the AUR now.
Regards,
Wayne Hartmann
I found a partial answer in the archives (new to the mailing list). Seems all
aur3 packages are gone forever?
Regards,
Wayne Hartmann
On August 11, 2015 at 1:47 PM Wayne Hartmann wa...@bitstorm.pw wrote:
All packages I was the maintainer of have all of a sudden disappeared. I do
not
Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:47:33 -0400 (EDT)
Wayne Hartmann wa...@bitstorm.pw:
All packages I was the maintainer of have all of a sudden
disappeared. I do not remember all the packages I adopted, but this
includes 'gnome-rdp' and 'bitdefender'. Not only do I maintain zero
packages now, they are not
On 8 August 2015 at 21:32, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
Kyrias deleted pypy-setuptools.
You will no longer receive notifications about this package.
Sorry why is this package deleted? I didn't find any deletion request on
aur-requests aur-reque...@archlinux.org.
Best Regards,
Yen Chi
On 11/08/15 01:47 PM, Wayne Hartmann wrote:
All packages I was the maintainer of have all of a sudden disappeared. I do
not
remember all the packages I adopted, but this includes 'gnome-rdp' and
'bitdefender'. Not only do I maintain zero packages now, they are not even
listed on the AUR now.
On 11 August 2015 at 18:47, Wayne Hartmann wa...@bitstorm.pw wrote:
All packages I was the maintainer of have all of a sudden disappeared. I
do not
remember all the packages I adopted, but this includes 'gnome-rdp' and
'bitdefender'. Not only do I maintain zero packages now, they are not even
On 11 August 2015 at 18:54, Wayne Hartmann wa...@bitstorm.pw wrote:
I found a partial answer in the archives (new to the mailing list). Seems
all
aur3 packages are gone forever?
Regards,
Wayne Hartmann
On August 11, 2015 at 1:47 PM Wayne Hartmann wa...@bitstorm.pw wrote:
All
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Lukas Fleischer lfleisc...@archlinux.org
wrote:
Hi,
There seems to be quite some confusion about the package migration
process and about package deletion. I would like to clarify my point of
view. Hopefully it serves as a basis for discussion (i.e. technical
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 at 15:37 Rob McCathie korr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/08/15 13:49, Doug Newgard wrote:
In my case, I have some that I'm actively trying to get maintainers
for; in the mean time, I'm looking after them even though they are
listed as being orphaned. Is this not to be
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 5:23 PM, David Phillips dbphillip...@gmail.com
wrote:
I suppose some may subscribe to the view that if someone wants it
badly enough, they'll submit, maintain and stick with it.
Exactly.
Hi,
There seems to be quite some confusion about the package migration
process and about package deletion. I would like to clarify my point of
view. Hopefully it serves as a basis for discussion (i.e. technical
discussion without attacking anybody personally).
As already mentioned a couple of
Several notification emails were sent directly rather than via aur-general.
Yes, but that isn't the same thing. Being subscribed to the list would
(should?) have made people aware of most of the issues surrounding the
migration, including the motivations behind it and the expectations of
On 12/08/15 13:49, Doug Newgard wrote:
In my case, I have some that I'm actively trying to get maintainers
for; in the mean time, I'm looking after them even though they are
listed as being orphaned. Is this not to be allowed now? Should all
orphan packages in the official repos be deleted,
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 05:16:03 +0200
Lukas Fleischer lfleisc...@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi,
There seems to be quite some confusion about the package migration
process and about package deletion. I would like to clarify my point of
view. Hopefully it serves as a basis for discussion (i.e.
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 07:24 David Phillips dbphillip...@gmail.com wrote:
I suppose some may subscribe to the view that if someone wants it
badly enough, they'll submit, maintain and stick with it.
In my case, I uploaded a perfectly working package for LSI raid
controllers, but someone commented
Thanks for clarifying your point of view Lukas. I think some AUR
maintainers are out-of-the-loop on the migration issues, for one reason or
another. I suspect some simply weren't subscribed to this list over the
last few months.
Several notification emails were sent directly rather than via
31 matches
Mail list logo
