On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Javier Vasquez wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Karol Blazewicz
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Javier Vasquez
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Sorry for the question, but I'd like to understand if pandoc-bin in
>>> AUR offers something the new pa
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Karol Blazewicz
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Javier Vasquez
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry for the question, but I'd like to understand if pandoc-bin in
>> AUR offers something the new pandoc in community doesn't.
>
> Try to find out what compile option
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Javier Vasquez
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the question, but I'd like to understand if pandoc-bin in
> AUR offers something the new pandoc in community doesn't.
>
> Before, there was no pandoc package under the repos, and there was no
> really full solution but the
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Javier Vasquez
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the question, but I'd like to understand if pandoc-bin in
> AUR offers something the new pandoc in community doesn't.
Try to find out what compile options does the upstream -bin one use or
ask on pandoc mailing list. BTW,
Hi,
Sorry for the question, but I'd like to understand if pandoc-bin in
AUR offers something the new pandoc in community doesn't.
Before, there was no pandoc package under the repos, and there was no
really full solution but the pandoc-bin. However I'm wondering if
that's already covered by pand
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 36 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 42 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 day
