Re: [aur-general] Request to check my PKGBUILD and suggest me some improvements

Alad Wenter schrieb am Sa., 13. Aug. 2016 um 23:25 Uhr: > Op 13.08.2016 om 22:39 schreef Patrick Eigensatz via aur-general: > > @Alad: > > > > Thanks, I changed this as well! > > > > > > @Florian: > > I thought if there was a variable for both I'd set both :) > > Should I

Re: [aur-general] Request to check my PKGBUILD and suggest me some improvements

Op 13.08.2016 om 22:39 schreef Patrick Eigensatz via aur-general: > @Alad: > > Thanks, I changed this as well! > > > @Florian: > I thought if there was a variable for both I'd set both :) > Should I remove the md5sum? Is there a guarantee every Archsystem > has the md5sum and/or the sha256 command

Re: [aur-general] Request to check my PKGBUILD and suggest me some improvements

@Alad: Thanks, I changed this as well! @Florian: I thought if there was a variable for both I'd set both :) Should I remove the md5sum? Is there a guarantee every Archsystem has the md5sum and/or the sha256 command available? Another question just popped in my mind: How does namcap find

Re: [aur-general] Request to check my PKGBUILD and suggest me some improvements

Op 13.08.2016 om 22:18 schreef Patrick Eigensatz via aur-general: > Hello Alad, Hello Dan > > Thank you very much for your ideas. I just pushed a new version of the > PKGBUILD > here: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=qjournalctl > > > Are there further improvements? The

Re: [aur-general] Request to check my PKGBUILD and suggest me some improvements

* Patrick Eigensatz via aur-general [2016-08-13 20:18:05 +]: > Thank you very much for your ideas. I just pushed a new version of the > PKGBUILD > here: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=qjournalctl > > > Are there further improvements?

Re: [aur-general] Request to check my PKGBUILD and suggest me some improvements

Hello Alad, Hello Dan Thank you very much for your ideas. I just pushed a new version of the PKGBUILD here: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=qjournalctl Are there further improvements? The point with the substitutions of $pkgver seems very handy to me! Thank you!

Re: [aur-general] Request to check my PKGBUILD and suggest me some improvements

Remove the "make -j 9" line. I'll review the rest in a sec On Aug 13, 2016 2:47 PM, "Patrick Eigensatz via aur-general" < aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > Hello folks! > > I am a beginner in Arch packaging but I just came to a stable point writing > my small systemd journal analyzer and

Re: [aur-general] Request to check my PKGBUILD and suggest me some improvements

Op 13.08.2016 om 21:47 schreef Patrick Eigensatz via aur-general: > Hello folks! > > I am a beginner in Arch packaging but I just came to a stable point writing > my small systemd journal analyzer and beeing a Arch user for some years now > I thought it would > be a good exercise for me to write a

[aur-general] Request to check my PKGBUILD and suggest me some improvements

Hello folks! I am a beginner in Arch packaging but I just came to a stable point writing my small systemd journal analyzer and beeing a Arch user for some years now I thought it would be a good exercise for me to write a PKGBUILD for my program and try to upload it to the AUR. It is now online @

Re: [aur-general] aur-general Digest, Vol 142, Issue 15

On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 at 14:23:42, Dwarf wrote: > > You can send a mail containing 'password' in the message body to > > 'aur-general-request'. You should get your password in the reply. > Thanks for the suggestion, but I forgot to clarify that it's for the > AUR, not the mailing list. You should

Re: [aur-general] aur-general Digest, Vol 142, Issue 15

> You can send a mail containing 'password' in the message body to > 'aur-general-request'. You should get your password in the reply. Thanks for the suggestion, but I forgot to clarify that it's for the AUR, not the mailing list.

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 28 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 50 packages missing signoffs * 13 packages older than 14