[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2016-10-01 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 14 packages missing signoffs * 10 packages older than 14 days

Re: [aur-general] aur-general Digest, Vol 144, Issue 1

2016-10-01 Thread Yassine Imounachen via aur-general
Thank you everybody this is very clear. Sorry I did inadvertently enable 'daily digest' , this is what explains my late response. On 1 Oct 2016 9:07 am, wrote: > Send aur-general mailing list submissions to > aur-general@archlinux.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide We

[aur-general] I can't upgrade my package

2016-10-01 Thread Juan Martínez
Hello aur-general! And first of all, i'm sorry I'm sorry because maybe you actually talked about this and i didn't looked at it because i'm lazy and deleted some e-mails without reading them. I have a package in AUR (with-git). And i want to update it because it had an error and also it's a good

Re: [aur-general] I can't upgrade my package

2016-10-01 Thread Doug Newgard
On Sat, 01 Oct 2016 14:42:22 -0300 Juan Martínez wrote: > Hello aur-general! And first of all, i'm sorry > > I'm sorry because maybe you actually talked about this and i didn't > looked at it because i'm lazy and deleted some e-mails without reading > them. > > I have a package in AUR (with-git

Re: [aur-general] I can't upgrade my package

2016-10-01 Thread Juan Martínez
El sáb, 01-10-2016 a las 12:53 -0500, Doug Newgard escribió: > On Sat, 01 Oct 2016 14:42:22 -0300 > Juan Martínez wrote: > > > > > Hello aur-general! And first of all, i'm sorry > > > > I'm sorry because maybe you actually talked about this and i didn't > > looked at it because i'm lazy and del

Re: [aur-general] I can't upgrade my package

2016-10-01 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, 01 Oct 2016 at 19:57:55, Juan Martínez wrote: > El sáb, 01-10-2016 a las 12:53 -0500, Doug Newgard escribió: > > On Sat, 01 Oct 2016 14:42:22 -0300 > > Juan Martínez wrote: > [...] > [mrat@mrat with-git]$ git push > Enter passphrase for key '/home/mrat/.ssh/aur':  > invalid command: git >

Re: [aur-general] I can't upgrade my package

2016-10-01 Thread Martin Kühne via aur-general
Could you please tell us the url you have in the output of the following command? $ git remote show origin cheers! mar77i

Re: [aur-general] I can't upgrade my package

2016-10-01 Thread Martin Kühne via aur-general
Ah, never mind. The one you already posted looks okay. You are running git push while in the repository directory, right? cheers! mar77i

Re: [aur-general] I can't upgrade my package

2016-10-01 Thread Juan Martínez
El sáb, 01-10-2016 a las 20:25 +0200, Lukas Fleischer escribió: > On Sat, 01 Oct 2016 at 19:57:55, Juan Martínez wrote: > > > > El sáb, 01-10-2016 a las 12:53 -0500, Doug Newgard escribió: > > > > > > On Sat, 01 Oct 2016 14:42:22 -0300 > > > Juan Martínez wrote: > > [...] > > [mrat@mrat with-git

Re: [aur-general] I can't upgrade my package

2016-10-01 Thread Juan Martínez
El sáb, 01-10-2016 a las 20:34 +0200, Martin Kühne via aur-general escribió: > Ah, never mind. The one you already posted looks okay. > You are running git push while in the repository directory, right? > > cheers! > mar77i Yes, I do -- Juan Martínez signature.asc Description: This is a digita

Re: [aur-general] I can't upgrade my package

2016-10-01 Thread Uwe via aur-general
Anything in .ssh/config that isn't on the wiki?

Re: [aur-general] I can't upgrade my package

2016-10-01 Thread Juan Martínez
El sáb, 01-10-2016 a las 20:44 +0200, Uwe via aur-general escribió: > Anything in .ssh/config that isn't on the wiki? As i showed it in my first mail: no, nothing different. -- Juan Martínez signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [aur-general] I can't upgrade my package

2016-10-01 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, 01 Oct 2016 at 20:38:11, Juan Martínez wrote: > El sáb, 01-10-2016 a las 20:25 +0200, Lukas Fleischer escribió: > > On Sat, 01 Oct 2016 at 19:57:55, Juan Martínez wrote: > [...] > Arch: > git version 2.10.0 > > Lubuntu (also tried from here since i have the same keys and all): > git versio

Re: [aur-general] I can't upgrade my package

2016-10-01 Thread Juan Martínez
El sáb, 01-10-2016 a las 21:04 +0200, Lukas Fleischer escribió: > On Sat, 01 Oct 2016 at 20:38:11, Juan Martínez wrote: > > > > El sáb, 01-10-2016 a las 20:25 +0200, Lukas Fleischer escribió: > > > > > > On Sat, 01 Oct 2016 at 19:57:55, Juan Martínez wrote: > > [...] > > Arch: > > git version 2.1

Re: [aur-general] I can't upgrade my package

2016-10-01 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, 01 Oct 2016 at 21:07:29, Juan Martínez wrote: > [...] > debug1: Remote: Forced command. > debug1: Remote: Port forwarding disabled. > debug1: Remote: X11 forwarding disabled. > debug1: Remote: PTY allocation disabled. > debug1: Remote: Forced command. > debug1: Remote: Port forwarding disab

Re: [aur-general] I can't upgrade my package

2016-10-01 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, 01 Oct 2016 at 21:34:02, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > Note the additional hyphen. One could argue that git-serve should > support both notations, however, for a short-term fix, you should figure > out why Git sends `git receive-pack` instead of `git-receive-pack`. Even better: I just added a p

Re: [aur-general] I can't upgrade my package

2016-10-01 Thread Juan Martínez
El sáb, 01-10-2016 a las 21:56 +0200, Lukas Fleischer escribió: > On Sat, 01 Oct 2016 at 21:34:02, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > > > Note the additional hyphen. One could argue that git-serve should > > support both notations, however, for a short-term fix, you should > > figure > > out why Git sends

Re: [aur-general] Copy package from AUR archive

2016-10-01 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 10/01/2016 09:55 AM, Yassine Imounachen via aur-general wrote: > Thank you everybody this is very clear. Sorry I did inadvertently enable > 'daily digest' , this is what explains my late response. > > On 1 Oct 2016 9:07 am, wrote: [...] >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it i