On 09/02/18 15:13, Rafael Fontenelle wrote:
> I don't see it as mandatory, but if I was the maintainer of this
> development package I would do as the developer says and request
> package deletion.
>
> In order to request deletion, you use the menu at the right of your
> package's page in AUR, "Su
On 10-02-18, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 12:12:44AM +0100, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:53:07PM -0600, Ivy Foster wrote:
> > > On 26 Jan 2018, at 10:31 +0100, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote:
> > > > Note: If possible please a
On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 12:12:44AM +0100, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:53:07PM -0600, Ivy Foster wrote:
> > On 26 Jan 2018, at 10:31 +0100, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote:
> > > Note: If possible please add a short reply with a GPG signature.
> >
> > My mista
Alad Wenter via aur-general writes:
> * The originally sent email does not match the email Brad applied with
> in 2010. [1]
> * There is no GPG signature, neither on the current application or the
> 2010 application, as to remove doubts.
> * The "itsbrad212" account is no longer present on AUR
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:50:23PM +0100, Marcin Wieczorek wrote:
> Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general writes:
> > I'm not sure if, in this case, he would need a sponsor or not. I don't
> > think we need to amend the bylaws to add this special case for a returning
> > TU, but I do think the stand
Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general writes:
> I'm not sure if, in this case, he would need a sponsor or not. I don't
> think we need to amend the bylaws to add this special case for a returning
> TU, but I do think the standard procedure should be followed.
One of you TU's can sponsor him right a
Em fevereiro 9, 2018 13:29 Alad Wenter via aur-general escreveu:
It seems we have no clause in the TU Bylaws [1] on what to do if a
Fellow wants to resume his position as TU. That said, I doubt any of us
would object when we consider your email as the "application" and simply
start the vote after
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 01:25:05AM -0500, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 02/09/2018 01:00 AM, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Perhaps this is a bit unorthodox, but in 2011 I resigned from my post
> > as a TU for personal and time-related reasons [1]. Coming up on
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 13:13:37 -0200
Rafael Fontenelle wrote:
> I don't see it as mandatory, but if I was the maintainer of this
> development package I would do as the developer says and request
> package deletion.
>
I, on the other hand, wouldn't. The entire point of - packages is to run
the inc
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:01:34PM +, John Lane wrote:
> Hi, I got the below sent to me regarding a pkg I have in AUR.
>
> I guess it should be deleted as per the request. I believe that requires
> a mail to this list?
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gsmartcontrol-svn/
>
> I verified
I don't see it as mandatory, but if I was the maintainer of this
development package I would do as the developer says and request
package deletion.
In order to request deletion, you use the menu at the right of your
package's page in AUR, "Submit request", select the proper type and
provide the re
Hi, I got the below sent to me regarding a pkg I have in AUR.
I guess it should be deleted as per the request. I believe that requires
a mail to this list?
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gsmartcontrol-svn/
I verified [1] the sender's address is indeed the upstream developer.
thanks.
[1] ht
12 matches
Mail list logo
