One problem is that the different gems have different upstream versions
(ruby-jekyll 2.5.3, ruby-jekyll paginate 1.1.0, etc).
However, ruby-jekyll should definitely depend on all of its
dependencies, which it does not do currently.
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera writes:
> Hi there!
>
> Jekyll is current
This probably belongs better on aur-general, so I've reposted it here.
On Thu, Jan 01, 2015 at 04:09:12AM +0100, Stefan Husmann wrote:
> Am 31.12.2014 um 10:34 schrieb not...@aur.archlinux.org:
> > Request #1823 has been rejected by Barthalion [1]:
> >
> > It is not a reason for deletion.
> >
> >
Do they work? If the packages work, they should be kept, even if they
are "useless" as you say, because someone may well find them useful for
one purpose or another.
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 08:46:53PM +0400, wrote:
> Please delete all ruby1.9* packages except for "ruby1.9-bundler" and
> "ruby1
Hi,
Please merge pyglet-hg [1] into python-pyglet-hg [2]
Pyglet is a Python library, so it should have the python- prefix.
Disclaimer: I'm the maintainer for python-pyglet-hg, and I stole some
of lubosz's PKGBUILD and updated mine.
P.S. I had a hell of a time getting the permissions right manu
Please merge ronn into ruby-ronn.
[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ronn/
[2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-ronn/
pgpCgmQbAzOq8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
I'm the maintainer for gvim-python. Can someone merge/delete it as
there is now a package in [extra], gvim-python3?
Thanks!
[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gvim-python/
[2]: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/gvim-python3/
[3]: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/
Please merge python-pytagcloud into python2-pytagcloud.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pytagcloud/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pytagcloud/
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 08:27:57PM +0200, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
> I feel that this PKGBUILD needs to be preserved for future generations
> after it has been deleted from AUR:
>
> pkgname=secure-certificates
> pkgver=0
> pkgrel=0
> pkgdesc="Trust no one"
> arch=(any)
> license=('WTFPL')
> url=('ht
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 05:53:08PM +, xantares 09 wrote:
>
> > Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 12:59:08 +
> > From: x...@archlinux.ca
> > To: aur-general@archlinux.org
> > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Remove python3-aur
> >
> > I have no intention of playing whack-a-mole with Python package names
>
mysql-connector-python can be merged into python-mysql-connector, since
they are the same package, but python-mysql-connector is named properly,
and mysql-connector-python is out of date.
Hi,
Can someone disown android-4.0.3? It has not been updated in two years
and needs its PKGBUILD fixed. I have tried emailing the current
maintainer, zertyz, but my email bounced with the message below, so I
think it would be okay to forgo the two weeks notice as there isn't a
way to reach him/
I just noticed that there are three packages for The Dark Mod game in
the AUR:
darkmod, v2.00-1, maintainer caemir
doom3-darkmod, v1.08-1, orphan
thedarkmod, v2.0-4, maintainer naelstrof
Do we have a policy for handling such situations? It seems like it
would be in everyone's best interests to m
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 03:21:54PM +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> On 3 November 2013 12:02, Allen Li wrote:
> > It is possible to merge projectm-jack in the AUR with the one in
> > community? I am the maintainer for the package in the AUR, and there's
> > no need for
It is possible to merge projectm-jack in the AUR with the one in
community? I am the maintainer for the package in the AUR, and there's
no need for it anymore since it is in community.
Allen
Hello,
I am the maintainer for two projectm packages in the AUR, namely
projectm-jack and projectm-libvisual-alsa. I think it would be best if
these were also included in the split PKGBUILD for projectm related
packages in the official repos. I see no reason to keep them separate
in the AUR.
P.
stone-soup-tile05
It's extremely out of date and orphaned. stone-soup is in community and
also includes tiles, so I see no reason for this to still exist.
Allen Li
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 04:19:12PM -0400, Dave Reisner wrote:
> What features are missing? Why not contact the Altlinux folks who
> maintain kbd and discuss how they can be re-added?
The -n and -s options that allow vlock to be used within an X session to
lock all consoles.
This has already been
Hello fellow Archers,
Does anyone by any chance have the original vlock source code?
A while back, community/vlock was taken in by core/kbd because vlock
upstream was dead. This should have been a good thing, but it is not a
good thing because the kbd version of vlock is missing important
featur
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 09:08:52AM -0700, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick
> >
> > Just do a goddamn filter in Gmail.
>
> Yes I am aware of filters (I worked in Gmail UI team btw). I already
> have 300+ filters and I hate to add more, espec
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 05:49:55PM -0400, Kyle wrote:
> Today I upgraded my espeak-test package in AUR from 1.46.53 to the
> latest 1.47.03b. However, while testing my PKGBUILD, I received a file
> conflict error when attempting to install the binary package using
> pacman -U. It seems that /usr/sh
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:55:26AM +0100, Markus Unterwaditzer wrote:
> Other options:
>
> * Deny the repeating of a specific action... e.g. you may not flag more than
> ten packages within ten minutes. Also block comments with same content.
>
> * ability to report users (dunno if already possib
t
>remember which packages I have to update now.
Instead of captchas for flagging packages, do we have captchas for
creating new accounts already? That seems more sensible. Also, perhaps
blocking new accounts using disposable emails, at least temporarily?
Allen Li
#x27;m guessing projectm-jack was also removed alongside these, however,
the split PKGBUILD for projectm in community doesn't actually provide
projectm-jack. I'll be reuploading projectm-jack, if there are no
objections?
Allen Li
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:30:02AM +0100, Christoph Vigano wrote:
> Hey everybody,
>
> I'm in the situation that one of my packages switched their VCS from SVN
> to Git. Is it okay to conflict both the non-SVN and the SVN package at
> the same time?
>
> The package in question is nagstamon-svn, w
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 07:01:21AM -0500, Dave Reisner wrote:
> To the OP, I suggest finding out what legitimately fails in the build when
> the user doesn't exist and patching the build system to suck less. When
> you're done, send your improvements upstream.
My suggestion would be to simply fail
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:12:35AM +0100, Paul Weingardt wrote:
> Here is the error message:
>
> Exception occurred:
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sphinx/environment.py", line 758, in
> read_doc
> pub.set_source(None, src_path.encode(fs_encoding))
> UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' code
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:52:12AM +0100, Karol Woźniak wrote:
> It seems that none cares after all, huh?
> But I still do want to do it as right as it can possibly be, mostly because
> I now need flake8 for both python 2 and 3.
> So if nobody complains, I'll go with my initial thought (see my prev
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:58:28AM +, Xyne wrote:
> Use "flake8" (Python 3) and "python2-flake8". If you cannot rename the
> installed
> files in python2-flake8 to avoid conflicts, add a "conflict=(python8)" to the
> PKGBUILD.
>
> In general the "python*-" prefix is reserved for library packa
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 07:07:27AM -0500, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
> If it is an application and does not provide a module that could be
> included in another application, then I suggest to depend on python3
> only and keep the name "flake8".
>
> Stéphane
>
That sounds reasonable enough, but I
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:43:07PM -0500, Yichao Yu wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:48 PM, 小龙 陈 wrote:
> > Hi Allen,
> >
> > I think the convention is to make two packages for software that
> > support both Python 2 and 3. For example, in the extra repo, there's
> >
> > python-cairo and python2
Hi everybody,
I know that the naming convention for python libraries is python(2)-*,
but do we have a convention for python applications installed for
different python versions?
The package in question is flake8, which can be installed for both
Python 2 and 3.
Allen Li
ate the wiki accordingly =).
Allen Li
ng at the moment, which I found inferior to ibus), so dropping it
is extremely unfavorable I think.
Just my two cents.
Allen Li
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 05:30:30PM +0200, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> ibus is used for keyboard input for a few major non-English languages.
&g
Hi,
Could someone delete python-spynner? The official download from pypi has been
down for a while now. I've uploaded python2-spynner-git which uses the
development version. If and when the official download comes back, I'll
reupload as python2-spynner as per proper naming conventio
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:00:21PM +0300, D. Can Celasun wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Allen Li wrote:
> >> > > Op zondag 15 juli 2012 21:46:08 schreef D. Can Celasun:
> >> > >> Wow, Déją vu! In the past another TU asked me the exact same question
it's updated a year or so later, and the maintainer may be
active but unaware of this. A friendly email reminder should be the first
step, and only if the maintainer doesn't respond then a TU should orphan. Am I
wrong?
Allen Li
36 matches
Mail list logo