Hi,
I no longer have time available to work on Arch Linux so I'm resigning
as a Trusted User. It was a great experience and I'll miss working with
you folks. I've been reducing my activity over time and there aren't any
packages left that I'm interested in maintaining. Unfortunately, I just
can't
On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 01:38 +, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Em março 22, 2017 18:12 Doug Newgard escreveu:
> >
> > There's no specific rule about it. Some packagers will include
> > packages in base
> > in the depends, some won't. It's completely up to them.
> >
>
> But, if at least the main
On 09/09/15 06:08 PM, David Kaylor wrote:
>>
>> I had it configured correctly to use the new key. However, since it wasn't
>> the primary key for the box, it wasn't transmitted for authentication. I
>> just changed my aur profile key to the primary key and it worked without
>> having to mess with t
> Thanks for clarifying your point of view Lukas. I think some AUR
> maintainers are out-of-the-loop on the migration issues, for one reason or
> another. I suspect some simply weren't subscribed to this list over the
> last few months.
Several notification emails were sent directly rather than vi
On 11/08/15 01:47 PM, Wayne Hartmann wrote:
> All packages I was the maintainer of have all of a sudden disappeared. I do
> not
> remember all the packages I adopted, but this includes 'gnome-rdp' and
> 'bitdefender'. Not only do I maintain zero packages now, they are not even
> listed on the AUR
On 26/07/15 04:01 PM, Igor Morozov wrote:
>
> That's right, I messed up. Instead of typing fastmail.com, I typed
> fastmai.com. And now there is no way I can access my account. The only
> option is to send an email to this mailing list describing my problem
> and hope that somebody will help me ou
On 12/07/15 11:24 AM, Andrejs Mivreņiks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The user instmania[1] has posted spam links in the comments section
> of almost every recently updated package. For example [2]
>
> [1] https://aur4.archlinux.org/account/instmania/
> [2] https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/warthunder/
I s
On 05/07/15 01:39 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> There's a PKGBUILD[1] on the AUR that downloads a binary that is illegal
> to distribute (due to licensing, it may only be distributed in source
> form).
>
> IMHO, it's a bit of a grey area if the PKGBUILD is legal or not (I
> believe it is not i
On 26/02/15 06:47 AM, Timothy M. Redaelli wrote:
> Hi,
> since Vidalia is no more maintained nor supported upstream
> (https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2015-February/036833.html)
> and FS#43802 I'll move it to AUR tommorow.
>
> Any objections?
No objections from me. I moved the arm
On 28/11/14 12:47 PM, Troy Engel wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Micay wrote:
>> On 28/11/14 12:32 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
>>>
>>> It shall never return.
>>
>> Never say never, the rules could be revisited one day :P. It makes sense
>&g
On 28/11/14 12:32 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
>
> It shall never return.
Never say never, the rules could be revisited one day :P. It makes sense
to forbid automatic installation, but it's a bit silly to forbid search
/ downloading from the AUR when we permit it for other third party
dumping grounds l
> I don't see anything on the requests list or on this one. Do you
> remember how this request was made?
I don't remember who made the orphan / delection requests for the tresor
packages, but I do remember that they were very neglected.
The remaining packages are now well-maintained and gets prom
On 30/09/14 10:51 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
> Is there any record of who did in the AUR logs?
I orphaned at least one out-of-date tresor package for someone many
months ago and deleted several other orphaned ones. Before the current
request system, the people making the requests were responsible for
se
On 30/09/14 08:07 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
> Hi,
> I wasn't contacted and apparently linux-lts-tresor has been
> disowned/taken over without my consent or any notice. Please explain...
>
> Ido
I don't remember who made the request to have it disowned or the exact
details involved. It was out-of-da
On 29/09/14 04:31 AM, Antonio wrote:
> This:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/sdl-nobackingstore/
> Should be removed because the arch package includes the nobackingstore
> patch.
> Thanks
Please flag for deletion next time.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 17/08/14 05:52 AM, Evgeniy Alekseev wrote:
>
> In my opinion TUs should *always* check a package under request. If sources
> are no longer available anywhere (such as for some of *berlios.de projects)
> it
> can be removed. If the package has not maintainer and if it has a few votes
> it
>
On 08/08/14 03:43 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> In the past, what packages provided by AUR needed signing, because after
> uploading somebody manipulated the packages? AFAIK https for the AUR
> downloads and checksums for the upstream downloads in the past didn't
> cause that often serious trouble, IIR
On 08/08/14 02:53 AM, Martti Kühne wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Fabien Dubosson
> wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> But it has not the same meaning. Maintainer's name gives me the
>> information that I am installing a package that claims to be provided by
>> this maintainer, or uploaded with this
On 06/08/14 01:45 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
> Am 06.08.2014 um 14:31 schrieb Florian Bruhin:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm maintaining the vim-full[1] package which is a vim with all the
>> gvim features (Ruby/Lua/Python/Perl/Netbeans) but without GTK/X.
>>
>> Now obviously I have to depend on vim-runtime, and
On 25/07/14 04:43 AM, Rob McCathie wrote:
> Hello AUR general & Compiz package maintainers.
>
> There was some discussion about Compiz packages a little while ago, i
> don't think that much came of it. I'd like to re-open the discussion.
>
> My opinions/suggestions:
>
> Calling the 0.8 series "c
On 17/07/14 03:03 AM, JOHN Myers wrote:
> Hey guys I'm sure you guys are cool and all but please STOP SENDING THOSE
> DARN NEWS LETTER! thank you
You subscribed to the mailing list so you're receiving mail. You can
unsubscribe at any time... sending mail here is just going to get you
more mail i
On 31/05/14 10:00 AM, Michael Kühn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/geoip-update/ does not to
> work as intended (see my comment) and there is no maintainer for it.
>
> I created a new package which should be more reliable:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/geoi
On 02/05/14 07:24 PM, Tristelune wrote:
> Nobody can tell me, where I have to change my email address or what is
> wrong ? If I asked at the wrong place, can somebody tells me where I
> can ask ?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Tristelune
On aur.archlinux.org you can go to the My Account page and edit the
emai
On 01/05/14 10:35 PM, Gabriel B. Casella wrote:
> So, techinically,
> if I can get this font by a third-party website that offers it for free, to
> personal use, can I pack?
You can if it's hosted legally. The AUR is not a place to post links to
pirated software.
signature.asc
Description: Open
On 29/04/14 04:02 PM, John D Jones III wrote:
>
> I also have an outstanding request for cw:
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cw/
>
> to be deleted. I'd like to go ahead and reemphasize the need for this to
> occur, since the package refuses to build, hasn't been updated upstream
> since 20
On 29/04/14 12:46 AM, Andy Weidenbaum wrote:
> counterwalletd has been renamed to counterblockd upstream. Packages for
> removal include:
>
> - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/counterwalletd/
> - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/counterwalletd-git/
Thanks, removed.
signature.asc
Descripti
On 15/04/14 02:33 AM, Gary van der Merwe wrote:
> Hi
>
> Please delete gnome-logs. It is now in extra.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-logs
>
> Thanks
>
Thanks, removed.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 11/04/14 01:58 PM, Joost Bremmer wrote:
> I understand this is the place to go to get packages removed, in which case
> I'd like to suggest deleting gnome-shell-theme-frieze [1].
>
> I adopted this package about a year ago but there have been no updates to
> the theme since Gnome 3.6. Since we'
On 09/04/14 11:12 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 10/04/14 12:58, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
I'm guessing this means cabal-install now is the only package outside
of [community] that uses ghc to build. Is that right?
>> That wo
On 04/04/14 05:38 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> 1. According to the comments, xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2 is just a
> duplicate of xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git. It has been orphaned.
> The only difference in PKGBUILDs (apart from the package name) is that
> xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2 has 2 e
On 23/03/14 05:16 AM, Jakub Klinkovský wrote:
> According to the comments of the submitter, arch-wiki-markdown [1] should be
> merged into arch-wiki-markdown-git [2].
>
> [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arch-wiki-markdown/
> [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arch-wiki-markdown-git/
>
On 23/03/14 05:10 AM, Jakub Klinkovský wrote:
> Please delete my package arch-wiki-docs-clean [1], the official arch-wiki-docs
> in community [2] now uses the same script.
>
> [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arch-wiki-docs-clean/
> [2]: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/arch
On 20/03/14 10:44 PM, John K. Luebs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to get mma disowned. I contacted the author and did not get a
> response, and the package has not been updated in over 2 years.
>
> I'd also like balsamiqmockups disowned. It has also not been updated
> in over a year and the maintaine
The mingw64 toolchain supports building for both 32 and 64-bit Windows,
and is included in the official repositories. I don't think there's much
reason to keep around the mingw32 packages as it's more broken than
mingw64 across the board and simply not well maintained. Is anyone
opposed to removing
On 16/03/14 06:25 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wonder whythe libwww packages still remain in [community].
>
> 1. It is a library, and
> 2. no other package depends on it. Even perl-libwww apparently does not.
>
> Normally libraries are not maintained in a repo for their own sake, are
On 14/03/14 12:55 PM, Pyro Devil wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I hereby formally request the compulsory expropriation of the
> mitmproxy-git package from its current owner alphazo. ;)
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mitmproxy-git/
>
> Because the current owner seems not to update this package anymore.
On 14/03/14 03:16 AM, David Phillips wrote:
> Please excuse me if this isn't the right list for this (I feel
> confident it is), but is there any reason why is it that something
> that's as reasonably update- and maintenance-free as
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sl not in community yet? It's
On 06/03/14 06:36 PM, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please remove the following packages:
>
> * python2-html5lib-hg [1] -- Development relocated to github, zero
> votes, outdated PKGBUILD, orphaned
> * py-html5lib [2] -- Outdated duplicate of community/python2-html5lib,
> orphaned
>
> Cheer
On 26/02/14 03:37 PM, Aaron Mueller wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I maintain some AUR packages and I am in doubt if I should update packages on
> rc
> candidates. In my special case, the package "worker" is on the stable version
> 3.3.0. This is the version which is linked on the website. But today the
> aut
On 18/02/14 05:15 PM, Det wrote:
>
> So I've somewhat occasionally compiled a list of dust and dead bodies by
> Googling things like 'deprecated', 'obsolete', "package is no longer
> needed" and "remove/delete this package" (all preceded by
> 'site:archlinux.org'). I've trimmed all the false alarms
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Philip A Reimer wrote:
> Hi
> Please merge. I renamed the package to match the name of sqlite in extra.
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-sqlite3
> into
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-sqlite
>
> -ant32
> http://amr.linuxd.org
Using the
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:26:22AM -0800, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
>> Hi everyone
>>
>> I would like to apply for a Arch Trusted User position. It is
>> sponsored by my co-worker and bright engineer David Reisner.
>
> My name is Dave and I approve
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
>
> - add android-sdk-* packages. Current AUR packages download binaries
> and install binaries to /opt/bin. The binaries are 32-bit. Instead we
> should build SDK from sources and provide proper 64/32-bit binaries.
> This might be tricky as A
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Aliaksandr Stelmachonak
wrote:
> exfat package was a first package for exfat kernel module, based on opened
> by samsung code. Currently it is outdated and not compatible with latest
> kernels. exfat-git is a replacement package, which is being supported and
> upda
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Alexandre Ferrando wrote:
> In October, with the beginning of the semester, I uploaded an eclipse
> plugin that I was to use in a subject. I'm not using it anymore and I doupt
> someone does, so:
>
> Could you please delete eclipse-ptp [ 1 ] ? Thank you
>
> [ 1 ]
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:23 AM, member graysky wrote:
> Please merge my old package into my new package thus retaining the
> comments/votes.
>
> Old package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hosts_update
> New package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hosts-update
>
> Thank you in advance!
>
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman
> wrote:
> > On 19 September 2013 05:40, Daniel Micay wrote:
> >> I've moved pandoc back to the AUR because the latest version picked up
> too
>
I've moved pandoc back to the AUR because the latest version picked up too
many new dependencies. It was convenient to have it in [community], but
it's much saner to maintain these with the automation used by the
arch-haskell project.
I only use it for Rust's documentation generator, and don't wan
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Lukas Fleischer
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 02:10:45PM +, Xyne wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to discuss our notions of "activity". According to the current bylaws,
>> [...]
>
> This discussion starts to get messy. Now there are three different
> threads discu
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Sam Stuewe wrote:
> On 2013-08-07 11:33, Sam Stuewe wrote:
>>
>> and non-votes are not the same as "no votes". Perhaps, instead of a
>> super majority, requiring no less than a certain number of no votes
>> would be a good idea. For instance, allowing 50%+1 to pass
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
> On 30 July 2013 19:56, Rob Til Freedmen wrote:
>> There are still >1000 packages without 'Category'
>> - apparently not a hot topic.
>
> I think most of these packages are created by uploading the PKGBUILD
> using burp or a similar AUR upl
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Rob Til Freedmen
wrote:
> There are still >1000 packages without 'Category'
> - apparently not a hot topic.
>
> Maybe we add another line to Statistics on the AUR front page just to
> let users know of packages not found by the package search function
> - unless se
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Xyne wrote:
> On 2013-07-27 18:31 +0200
> Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
>
>>> Discussion period has ended. Start the voting:
>>> https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=69
>>Le voting period has ended. Dicebot-san is now officially Dicebot-sama!
>>Let's perform our ritual new
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:30 PM, John D Jones III
wrote:
> Please orhpan https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-sub-name/ the
> maintainer has been contacted to bump the pkgrel to trigger a rebuild.
> perl-moose and a number of other modules depend on this module, and since
> the initial request
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Geoffrey van Wyk
wrote:
> On Thursday 18 July 2013 14:56:40 Anatol Pomozov wrote:
>
>> "if a package is marked out-of-date
>> for more than 3 months then it disowns automatically"
>
> Looks like a good policy.
As long as it fires off a warning email or two (at 1 m
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Felix Yan wrote:
> On Saturday, July 13, 2013 10:33:46 Armin K. wrote:
>> Please remove [1], it's now in [community]
>>
>> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libcxx
>
> Well, I didn't see it in [community], could you reply with the new name?
> Thanks.
>
> Rega
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:04 AM, GSC wrote:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/account/JOYOAUTO/
> Spam here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/auto-complete/
>
Thanks, definitely a spammer. Account is suspended now.
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Evan Teitelman wrote:
> Could you please remove the package 'archtrack-services'? (
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/archtrack-services/)
Deleted, thanks.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Andrew Crerar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I (andrewSC) would like to request ownership of gtk3-git (
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk3-git/) as it's been flagged
> out-of-date for some time now. If it's also possible could gtk+-git (
> https://aur.archlinux.org/
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Devin J. Pohly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The libsbsms package is now sbsms. There's no real history on libsbsms,
> seeing as it's less than a day old, so you can just delete it rather
> than merging.
>
> Remove: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libsbsms/
>
> Thanks!
> *d
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Stefan Husmann
wrote:
> Hello
>
> I accidently uploaded libgee-0.6, which is a suplicate of libgee06 in
> [extra]. Please delete it.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgee-0.6/
>
> Best Regards Stefan
Thanks, deleted.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 3:10 PM, David J. Haines wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 01:01:37PM -0400, Daniel Micay wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> > On 25 April 2013 17:15, Maxime GAUDUIN wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 5
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> On 25 April 2013 17:15, Maxime GAUDUIN wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 5:31 PM, David J. Haines wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:17:36AM -0400, Jonathan Arnold wrote:
>>> > On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:04:12 +0100
>>> > WorMzy Tykashi w
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:24 AM, David J. Haines wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:32:36PM -0400, Daniel Micay wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Jason St. John wrote:
>> > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Maxime GAUDUIN wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Apr 7, 2
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Jason St. John wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Maxime GAUDUIN wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Marcel Korpel wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Maxime GAUDUIN wrote:
>>> > I mostly agree with you, but I would still keep the git pac
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Moritz Rudert (helios)
wrote:
> Please remove youtube-downloader
> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/youtube-downloader/) because it has
> been replaced with youtube-viewer
> (https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/youtube-viewer/).
>
> Thanks and greet
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Jakub Klinkovský
wrote:
> Please delete these packages, the sources are fetched from an out-of-date repo
> (last update was a year ago), previous mainainer disowned them today after I
> sent him an email.
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/chromium-browser-ppa/
>
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Tai-Lin Chu wrote:
> 1. save bandwidth
> 2. less wait
>
> why not add --depth 1 :)
If you're using a git package, I assume you're updating it at some
frequency and you only have a full clone on the first build.
ppropriate and suspect it to be a
> red herring.
>
> I assert you should provide evidence for your lack of trust in him, or you
> should apologize publicly..
>
> Eric Waller
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Daniel Micay wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 24,
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> The current (majority) voting system is fine -- making decisions based
> on consensus agreement is not a suitable method for the TU selection
> process (it would needlessly raise the bar for something that is not a
> matter of public safe
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Kirill Churin wrote:
> Hello TUs, please delete
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-ms-fonts-zh_cn/ as it provides links
> to actual licensed fonts, thanks.
>
> --
> Kirill Churin
> Jabber: reflex...@reflexing.ru
Thanks for catching this, deleted.
There have been exactly zero spammers on the ArchWiki since the
captcha was added for registration, the last time a user had to be
blocked was 2011.
>
> This would only work if there is some kind of already existing PGKBUILD,
> but I think he tries to write one from scratch for a software not yet in
> the official repos or the AUR.
>
> Using namcap and elf2pkgs is then the best solution to figure out the
> corresponding packages in the repos.
>
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 5:35 PM, oliver wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is there an easy way to find out, which package dependencies
> a package has?
>
> Say, i want to write the PKGBUILD for a package,
> and the compilation on my system (.7configure/cmake and make)
> does work without problems.
>
> Then I don
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Limao Luo wrote:
> I'm requesting deletion of my package 2299thegame [1] because the binary
> (from an older release) segfaults, there is no source I could find anywhere
> else, and even the original Realstudio source files cause a segfault when I
> open them in Re
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Federico Cinelli
wrote:
> "cinelli” is what I go by in #archlinux, the Arch Linux forums, the AUR, and
> the
> bug tracker. My full name is Federico Cinelli. My sponser is Daniel Wallace
> (gtmanfred)
>
> I have been an active member of the Arch Linux community
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> On 02/08/2013 01:37 AM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:35, Armin K. wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/07/2013 10:36 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
On 7 February 2013 23:26, Armin K. wrote:
>
> Please remove my package [1].
>
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:35:41AM +0100, Max Roder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please disown stormlib [1]. E-Mail to the current maintainer was sent on
> 13/01/01, no response yet. Last update was in 2011.
>
> Thanks
>
> Max
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stormlib/
>
Disowned, thanks!
sig
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Dave Reisner wrote:
>>
>> And I'm overdue on announcing this. The finally tally is:
>>
>> Yes: 20
>> No: 1
>> Abstain: 5
>>
>> By the power bested in me I now pro... wait, no. Wrong speech...
>>
>>
>>
79 matches
Mail list logo
