guess you're not in luck if you really wanted that learning
experience of maintaining a package. In that case, feel free to find
more cool software to maintain instead. ;)
...
Note that deleted packages in the AUR retain their git backing history
even when delisted, for historical tra
27;s
> not good.
> ""
>
> It should be possible as per "Modify committer or author identity" in
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines
> (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines)
Should be fixed now.
iod, in which Evgeniy can state his case.
7 days is the discussion period for a normal removal vote; the
discussion period for one triggered by inactivity is 3 days.
Other than that, this seems quite reasonable.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ts.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2020-October/045427.html
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2020-October/045522.html
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2020-October/045529.html
> Is there anything I can do to get the maintainer status back?
>
> Best
orgot
password" link on the login page? https://aur.archlinux.org/passreset/
You should be able to do account recovery via email on your own.
Since you do not have an SSH key *or* a PGP key associated with your
account, we will be unable to verify your credentials using those as an
emergenc
On 9/7/20 6:59 AM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 8/23/20 9:47 AM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
>> On 8/23/20 4:42 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 09:15:34 +0100 Carsten Haitzler
>>> said:
>>>
>>> Forgot to pgp sign... this reply is.
>>&g
nned comment going into detail about why users should
consider using it. More knowledge never *hurts*.
[1] https://github.com/muennich/sxiv/compare/master...BachoSeven:master
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2020-September/044316.html
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 8/23/20 9:47 AM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 8/23/20 4:42 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 09:15:34 +0100 Carsten Haitzler
>> said:
>>
>> Forgot to pgp sign... this reply is.
>>
>>> Hi Everyone.
>>>
>>> I'm Carst
> outside the build directory (for example store the build artefacts
> outside the build-dir and package them from there)…
>
> Cheers,
> Knut
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dust/#comment-764039
>
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ses lose
out. Hence why it's a question.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
i, Ephoto
>> https://www.enlightenment.org/about-ephoto, Enventor
>> https://www.enlightenment.org/about-enventor)
>>
>> I'd also be happy to help maintain packages I know I depend on and work with
>> that might be a bit niche like:
>>
>> * packagekit
&g
latest version. But try to see if upstream can update their code to
be compatible with the latest versions of their dependencies...
> 4) Not package ruby gems at all.
>
> I don't like neither of these options, but I think packaging versioned
> gems is lesser evil.
>
> What
ecause it is a script and not written in C. :)
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ksn7m9ivhLQtzGOCI
>
> They are also be available on the home page when logged out.
>
> Regards,
> Giancarlo Razzolini
(I'm never logged out, so I never see them.)
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
; the build before building it users relying on those AUR repos listed
> in the Wiki will get broken packages.
Never mind CI systems or TU repos. The official repos operate on exactly
this rule already. All official repo packages are intended to be
installed on systems with "base" inst
On 7/23/20 4:07 PM, alad via aur-general wrote:
>
> On 23/07/2020 15:45, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
>> On 7/23/20 9:17 AM, alad via aur-general wrote:
>>> Am 23/07/2020 um 15:10 schrieb Budi via aur-general:
>>>> h\How to know what dependencies only ne
The second point is not mandated (you can depend on a package fulfilling
> the needed library depends, transitively), though helpful when listing
> rebuilds. Otherwise, see the packaging guidelines on the wiki.
>
> (inb4 10 pages of discussion after a 1-sentence question)
--
Eli S
1.0.5-2 (xorg-fonts xorg)
> X.org font encoding files
>
> So xorg-fonts-alias-100dpi is not installed.
pacman -Syu tried to install it as a brand-new dependency of
xorg-fonts-100dpi, but in order to do that you need to remove
xorg-fonts-alias.
When pacman prompted you to rem
ge needs to adapt to perfectly normal changes in
https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/xorg-fonts-alias&id=dcd3d0ba7d39ff30e26ef55441f760d6408224fd
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 6/27/20 8:39 AM, Tom Hale wrote:
> Hi Eli,
>
> On 27/4/20 10:20 pm, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
>> I'd be amenable to re-enabling your account with a warning to be more
>> careful next time. However, I would appreciate it if you were to
>> acknowledge
On 6/3/20 8:26 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 08:11:32 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
>> On 6/3/20 8:06 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-cpanel-json-xs/#comment-749091
>>>
>> What is a "search-UR
/#comment-749091
>
> What is the recommended solution to solve this issue?
What is a "search-URL"?
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
repositories use sysusers.d files, and see
how they are using it for inspiration. (Or see which packages on your
system provide files in /usr/lib/sysusers.d/)
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 5/14/20 1:53 PM, Markus Schaaf wrote:
> Am 12.05.20 um 17:53 schrieb Eli Schwartz via aur-general:
>
>> I'd generally expect an optdepends for something which the program
>> has a built-in ability to use simply by installing the optdepends.
>
> I'm sorry, b
t
should remain an AUR kind of thing (and we don't optdepends on AUR
packages either). This probably makes it more complicated to support
their stuff, especially for things which aren't open source?
tl;dr do you believe this is practical to focus on? Do you think they
are likely to provide a way for us to package it which fits our
packaging guidelines?
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
another facility, e.g. gpgme to use gpg, or
> ghostscript to produce PDF.
I'd generally expect an optdepends for something which the program has a
built-in ability to use simply by installing the optdepends.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
f you want to use the default rubber command, you need to install at
> least 'rubber' and 'texlive-core'. The plugin does no magic. It just
> calls a command. You may test the very same command in a terminal.
On the other hand, this *would* seem like a good situation
ook at the following resources to start with:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Creating_packages
and https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Classroom#Previous_classes (I
am a big fan of the class titled "The Beginner's Guide to Arch Linux
Package Management" :p)
And of c
st week, today or tomorrow.
Don't write to "${pkgdir}" in your build() function.
Instead, instruct the software to install to
"${srcdir}/temp_install"
and then in package() you may 'mv' this to "${pkgdir}".
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ent comments, but especially
pinned comments, when you have something to discuss about a package.
It's possible someone else has noticed the same thing you did, and
provided a solution. Or, in this case, it's possible there was a very
important notice, and reading it could prevent a grea
ve
anything you want to say in support of getting your account unlocked?
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rg/task/56602 asking for a checkbox for "this is
a VCS package".
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
gt;> to changed dependencies etc.
>>>> Georg
>>>>
>>
>> Kind of. pkgrel is for changes to the built package, there's plenty of
>> changes
>> you can make to the PKGBUILD that don't change the actual package; those
>> don't
>&g
On 3/3/20 3:50 PM, Alexander Fasching wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-03-03 at 15:36 -0500, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
>> On 3/3/20 2:09 PM, karx via aur-general wrote:
>>> Hello all, sorry if this is not in the appropriate mailing list. I
>>> am
>>> develop
anything that was still unclear to you after reading it?
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ense at all. What is the point of having
so many packages for the same thing?
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
>
>
> [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_submission_guidelines
>
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mesa-noglvnd
>
> [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gcc-git/
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
it's about official
repository affairs, not AUR affairs...
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
the arch-general mailing list, it is the aur-general mailing
list.
*arch*, not *aur*.
arch-gene...@archlinux.org
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
gh a subshell and the ls program just to break on strange corner
cases, and eventually get the glob expansion right back anyway.
You're still using unquoted:
cd $(dirname $(dirname $(realpath $0)))
Also, license=('custom') -- where is the license text? See
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#license
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
same directory you
installed to, but building it using dirname/realpath, you should not be
assuming *anything* about the path.
pkgver=2019
_pkgver=1.02
This is confusing and the latter should maybe be "_minor_version" or
something that makes it clear why they are so different.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ing over the
network.
Also, libxml2 from 2 years ago, which is a bit ouch because xml is not
exactly the least-exploited data format ever.
Even linux distributions which build statically by default, will expect
that the program link to the system's lib*.a static library packages
rather than build
beds full paths into binaries.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
here any difference between when makepkg executes that command and when I
> do it myself?
Well, makepkg runs under fakeroot.
But forget about that. Why is setup.py install attempting to install the
.git/ directory of a git repository?
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ux.org: Permission denied (publickey).
> fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
>
> Please make sure you have the correct access rights
> $
>
> Is this .ssh/config enough for ssh-agent ?
Are you sure your pubkey is added to your AUR profile?
What is the full output of the c
remote's url for pushing
- use "git push white_dune master" to push to the alternative remote
Also: why are you adding a remote with the literal value "pkgbase"?
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 1/15/20 5:35 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 1/15/20 4:17 PM, michael Bostwick via aur-general wrote:
>> Hi,
>> This is my first time writing the mailing list, to be honest I would
>> have preferred anther way of bringing this up, but *I didn't see an easy
>> wa
at all, as that seemed to be being called into
question and I very much do not believe that should be the case. As
such, I've pointed out that there was a context to the event, and that
this context matters.
I would have preferred to see an email which said "I hope no one was
banned by the writer of this comment simply for asking an innocent
question in good faith", which would better parallel the interpretation
that Michael is concerned the comment itself was more strongly worded
than it needed to be in order to relay its message.
And then I could respond very simply: "That is correct, the only people
who need to be concerned about the warning are a select group of people
who demonstrated by e.g. repetitive action that they were no longer
acting in good faith. What can I do to clarify this comment's intended
audience and scope?"
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
uot;
The original comment was somewhat context-sensitive with regard to the
actual content it addressed, which was indeed atrocious and deserved to
be described as atrocious.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
mments with some discussion about their needing
to delete gpg.conf in order for the /usr/bin/gpg command to work.
Most people will not even see this warning, because they simply download
the PKGBUILD with an AUR helper and neither see existing comments nor
post their own.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
u have the correct access rights
> and the repository exists.
Why did you set the remote url for "origin", then try to pull from
"white_dune"?
What is the "white_dune" remote?
Consider deleting your clone, re-cloning, and redoing your changes. It
might help you av
build directory
> and is not a URL.
> ==> ERROR: Failed to generate new checksum
>
> The URL exists, but updpkgsums refuses to read it...
Because "url" shows the homepage of the software, and has nothing to do
with the "source" to be downloaded.
I have no idea what
Clone URL". If
you're the maintainer, it will mention an ssh url in addition to the
usual "https://... (read-only)".
Use that url.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
t;
>> Maybe this can be communicated accordingly, when no other maintainer can
>> be found.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Karol Babioch
>>
>>
> We don't really have any system for communication for things like that in
> place except for this mailing li
ly knows
that the package is gone, and if you want to get it, you'll need to
install it from the AUR. AUR maintainers may take inspiration for
writing a new PKGBUILD, based on previous revisions of the one in the
official repos, but that is all.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
pdate it, since this
implies that the non-development AUR package uses VCS sources that are
not pinned to a specific commit or tag.
Please report such package violations for deletion or other corrective
measures.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ternal review by fellow team members. Unilateral decisions aren't a
bad thing and don't need to be cast in a negative light.
We held a meeting and a bunch of team members decided to carry out this
action with no active "no" votes -- no other feedback is needed, and
regular users
On 10/29/19 1:22 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Em outubro 29, 2019 14:09 Eli Schwartz via aur-general escreveu:
>>
>> Correction: there is "a blacklist", but it's only used to prevent
>> namespace conflicts for users who attempt to upload packages named the
s' package? Now we have two implementations of "aur", and they
don't correctly conflicts=() each other! At least one of them has its
own unique brand, though.
(It even has a logo:
https://github.com/AladW/aurutils/blob/master/06Nitori1.png)
> Another alternative is that you name wh
d name, I could conceive of it being the name
for a package which installs the aur.archlinux.org software, though
"aurweb" would be an even better name. ;)
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
e who
disagrees with you is being "not constructive" and therefore their
comments are "not welcome".
No one here is interested in a repetition of
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2019-October/046991.html
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2019-October/046999.html
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ry.)
...
That being so, I think it would be fine to name it either adwaita-qt or
adwaita-qt5, but I still don't quite see the purpose in conflicting
against an alternative package name that should not exist. adwaita-qt4
can be its own unrelated package, I suppose.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wran
, and if anyone depends on "adwaita-qt5" which does not exist,
this package must provide that dependency.
(Some people might argue that the package should be called adwaita-qt5
anyway. It would match the naming for other qt5-* packages then.)
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Tr
User_Guidelines#TODO_list_for_new_Trusted_Users.
Welcome! I've updated your bugtracker account to grant you Trusted User
status for the Community Packages project, and made you a member of our
internal Keyring project.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
every 12 hours for the
majority of the voting period (3 days in, 4 left to go?)
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
...
I would like to know how this was ever a problem. Did you not try to
build the package for aarch64 before uploading it?
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
and there is now a
Keyring ticket open for your key: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/63926
(I have added you to the notifications for this ticket.)
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ntitled to Arch Linux support for those Arch systems,
regardless of which AUR packages you install on them (even the ones
which bring back /etc/rc.conf). ;)
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ix, or Parabola, you will get banned.)
I am therefore unsure why you think we need an "explanation" for keeping
them, as though it is some sort of dirty secret and we need to air the
laundry and demand explanations from the "guilty parties" via some form
of mob-with-pitchfork mentality.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
d to working with you and welcome any questions and
> comments!
>
> Cheers,
> Jonas
>
> [1] https://github.com/tpm2-software/tpm2-totp
> [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/63171
> [3] https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2019-July/023493.html
> [4] https
t; file. If that's intentional, carry on.
The url points to a valid prebuilt *.pkg.tar.xz, so that's not really a
"source" either.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
: using makepkg -g >> PKGBUILD will lead to repeatedly appending
checksum lines, which you will need to edit in order to remove old
versions. The updpkgsums script from pacman-contrib will use makepkg -g
in order to update checksums in-place.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ally incorrect:
https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/PKGBUILD?h=ipython-7&id=42c1ff5d25a9ddc034154b5651483076658b6ec5
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
refix="$pkgdir/usr" in package(), I'm
pretty sure it will just build a second copy all over again, during the
package() step.
Repeat after me: "curse you, npm".
It is very, very, very difficult to provide meaningful criticism of an
npm PKGBUILD. There aren't a lot of
It's like passing DESTDIR="$PKGDIR"
PREFIX=/usr to a Makefile. It seems totally like the correct thing to do
for an npm project.
> == Conclusion ==
>
> - I think you are on the right path, but some decisions made me wonder whether
> your sponsors actually reviewed the PKGBUILDS with you.
If this is the worst that the applicant has, then that's not very bad at
all. :D :D
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
being on the team, then you
should at least let your sponsors know the position you are in, which
you are asking them to stake their reputation on. They will want to have
the opportunity to evaluate and hopefully decide that those reasons no
longer apply (or they disagree with the other prospective sponsor&
On 8/17/19 5:30 AM, Ike Devolder wrote:
> On 12/08/2019 20:18, Eli Schwartz wrote:
>> @Ike,
>>
>> I'm curious what made you choose to call it "kodi-bin" instead of what
>> seems to me like the more descriptive and accurate "kodi-x11". Perhaps
>
since I've had lots of fun building it [2], its a phenomenal piece of
> open-source software, and it'd be nice to have it officially supported
> by the Arch community (it also has a nice number of votes in the AUR)!
>
> Thank you for your time, and thank you to all who
arser, not via regular expressions on
an HTML file.
As I said on Wednesday:
> If you want an HTML index, you can generate your own or rely on
> webserver software to do so automatically, but it would be entirely for
> the interactive viewing pleasure of the user.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug
tself.
If you want an HTML index, you can generate your own or rely on
webserver software to do so automatically, but it would be entirely for
the interactive viewing pleasure of the user.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
e you could provide a bit more explanation, highlight what I said
here about kodi-devel-bin vs kodi-bin-devel? Then we can wait for the
maintainer to respond (it's only been three days, so he might not have
noticed yet), and play it by ear from there.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
On 8/12/19 2:33 PM, Paul Finkelshteyn wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 14:23:51 -0400
> Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
>> I think you can probably use github pages for this. Github already
>> allows release assets, and there are definitely people putting release
>> asse
On 8/12/19 2:12 PM, Paul Finkelshteyn wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 14:03:55 -0400
> Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> As kodi-devel-bin take almost forever to build I've created github
>>> https://github.com/asm0dey/ar
ll it "kodi-bin" instead of what
seems to me like the more descriptive and accurate "kodi-x11". Perhaps
it might make sense to change the pkgname?
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
with the package maintainer, and hopefully it can be
resolved amicably. :)
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
s "you are allowed to advertise your repository on
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unofficial_user_repositories and on
the package details for the AUR package".
In fact, you're actually encouraged to do so. That's why we have the
wiki listing in the first place. :)
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ent versions, from
git master, then it *also* needs to be renamed, yes.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ry and therefore does
not support replaces, it is possible there are AUR helpers which
implement it though" (or they would, if the RPC interface actually
supported that sort of search).
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ntirely too many packages at the moment and two of
them are probably duplicates. I'd suggest the "cinelerra" prefix either
way, it seems cleaner and cinelerra-cv dates back to *at least* Arch
Linux's initial import of PKGBUILDs into subversion, back in 2009...
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
migration to AUR 4.0?
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
you tried creating it today, and it seemed to work from
the website but never registered in the backend. Since the disk space
issue is now resolved, can you try signing up again?
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
Their
rationale for doing so is, I think, that it offends their morality to
know that the build system is at all capable of using vendored code.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
4-linux-64.tbz2
>
> This hash does not match up with the hash claimed by the PKGBUILD for his
> rehosted version, which suggests that the rehosted package is not identical
> to the official one. I don't know whether this is due to incompetence or
> malice, but it is worrisome,
ay not be an issue 😉
OK -- from our end, we would then recommend that the person who uploaded
the AUR package will use a local://libccmio-2.6.1.tar.gz link and users
who wish to install libccmio will have to (legally) acquire it from the
copyright holders somehow.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and
ormer is special cased in
makepkg as "you need to obtain this yourself", while the latter is a
type of link that /usr/bin/curl understands and will try to download
from the local filesystem.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ay (and fixing the root of the problem, which
is the distribution by https://portal.nersc.gov/ which may or may not
have the right to do so).
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
lone_wolf-lib32-llvm-git
>
>
> llvm-mesa-git seems to vague, while llvm-trunk-for-mesa-trunk-git feels
> clumsy and long.
>
> Please help me to find a good name for these packages.
>
> Lone_Wolf
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ion, but it does
guarantee that they have it installed and provides pacman hints so that
users know why the software does not work on other versions.
This works because there is a standard for all java packages to
provides=(java-runtime=$majorver)
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
es achieve a lot. It achieves a state of
being, whereby competent users who read the instructions, know what is
on their system, and act responsibly, build some package against current
development versions of llvm, tracking code that is far ahead of
[extra]/llvm.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrang
eological purity in the AUR. Even though no one can
actually suggest a better way of doing it that answers the
thought-provoking usability concerns which have been raised.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
1 - 100 of 544 matches
Mail list logo
