On 22/10/2018 16.29, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
On 10/22/18 7:52 AM, LoneVVolf wrote:
I think this can be solved by clarifying what upstream is.
example :
archlinux foo package has foo.org as upstream
archlinux32 uses archlinux foo package as base , upstream = archlinux
manjaro32
On 22/10/2018 12.16, hagar wrote:
Or is the answer simply: "Don't rely on package versioning for your
modified packages"?
Best,
Tinu
Unfortunately maybe something is needed as I use a local repository to
serve my localnet.
I build once and then install by update from my repository.
Severa
Check https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/indicator-bulletin-git/?comments=all
It does look to me like that tyson24 account belongs to a spambot OR the
email addy has been infected by spambots.
Can a TU look into this ?
LW
On 06-04-18 08:11, Albert Graef via aur-general wrote:
The llvm35 package recently got kicked from extra, but I need it for
my Pure package (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pure/) which in
turn is needed for a bunch of other packages I maintain in the AUR.
So I resurrected llvm35 from extra,
On 05-12-17 09:27, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ grep CHOST /etc/makepkg.conf*
/etc/makepkg.conf:CHOST="x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
/etc/makepkg.conf-20130715_000209.bak:CHOST="x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
/etc/makepkg.conf.pacnew:CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$
Hi,
I do have the impression that the number of aur comments about pacakges
not building unless foo is installed has gone up.
Very often foo turns out to be part of base-devel or multilib-devel.
Answering that is easy, by linking to main AUR wiki page that clearly
states base-devel is assumed
On 04-07-17 10:19, NicoHood wrote:
About the original suggestion for the AUR:
I think its worth to have a pinned comment on the AUR page. The package
maintainer should add it if an user gives him the hint. If he doesnt
accept it a TU should check if the request is valid and pin the users
comment
On 28-06-17 02:56, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Hello,
I have put gcc63 to AUR, merely to have a working gcj implemetation, but
something is wrong with it. If I compile anything with it, ldd shows
that the resulting binaries have wrong symbols. For instance,
ldd ~/paketierung/meine_Pakete/fotoxx/pkg/
On 18-05-17 18:25, André Silva wrote:
Otherwise, i won't maintain more packages than linux-libre{,-lts} and
free firmware in Arch since i have another personal projects too. So i
would just help maintain my kernels in [community] as my contribution
for all users who loves use it.
Andre.
to me
On 29-03-17 09:32, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
So, I didn't think such a technical question would spark so much passion!
Maybe this discussion should indeed go to arch-dev-public.
In the meantime, I see 4 positions emerge from the discussion:
1) packages in "base" *should* be explicitely listed as
On 21-10-16 13:15, Bruno Pagani wrote:
Can we have hints about why this happened? Especially, cozy-nginx,
cozy-standalone and cozy-apache all redirect users to cozy package.
Thanks,
Bruno
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2016-October/013898.html
On 13-06-16 10:41, Bennett Piater wrote:
On 06/12/2016 02:26 PM, mar...@marcin.co wrote:
Hi
I think you should use pkgver in source url.
Also, why would you copy libs to opt?
License is usually named just LICENSE
Is that the third package release? Or first?
Thanks!
I used $pkgver in the source
On 27-05-16 23:35, Storm Dragon wrote:
Howdy,
It says the directory already exists and is not empty. Here's the
PKGBUILD I was working on with the git clone stuff done in the
prepare() function:
Oh, and the command I'm using is just makepkg -s
Thanks
Storm
In the prepare()function ,use somet
On 27-05-16 09:30, Christoph Gysin wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Storm Dragon wrote:
I have a PKGBUILD that requires git-lfs. It fails every time, even though,
What command do you use to build? How does it fail?
Christoph, check https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=211424 .
Hi,
The package airvpn-portable [1] installs files in userfolders [2] and
imo should be deleted ASAP.
I filed a deletion request,but felt this issue is serious enough to warn
about this package.
I would like to advise users to remove it from their systems
immediately, but don't know if addit
On 26-12-15 05:56, Doug Newgard wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 01:13:39 +0100
Peter Tobler wrote:
Here is the mentioned PKGBUILD:
http://pastie.org/pastes/10652982/text?key=23xhgip17gp9tvriuiyma
There's no reason to use the conditionals with the depends array anymore,
pacman supports architectu
On 12-11-15 10:56, Pieter ROBYNS wrote:
Hi,
I found out why the AUR bazel package didn't work for me: the problem was
that ~/.bazelrc needs to point to %workspace%:/opt/bazel/base_workspace/
(as explained in the comments here:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bazel/). So now everything works a
On 05-09-15 21:22, Christopher Reimer wrote:
On 05.09.2015 20:15, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 05/09, Christopher Reimer wrote:
Unfortunately aurweb is unable to resolve vdr-api back to the actual
vdr package.
So either it's a bug in aurweb or my construct (vdr-plugin --> vdr-api
- --> vdr) is
On 05-09-15 15:06, LoneVVolf wrote:
vdr should depend on vdr-api .
LW
I think i got that wrong and it should be reversed : vdr-api needs to
depend on vdr .
LW
On 05-09-15 13:38, Christopher Reimer wrote:
So either it's a bug in aurweb or my construct (vdr-plugin --> vdr-api
- --> vdr) is way to complex an there's an easier approach.
Any opinions?
Thanks
Christopher
The easiest solution is to make vdr-api a virtual package, like
java-environment
On 03-08-15 13:42, Armin K. wrote:
On 3.8.2015 13:38, Armin K. wrote:
Hi,
Anyone interested in some (all) of my packages? I don't
have the time to maintain them anymore.
broadcom-wl
mesa-git
lib32-mesa-git
llvm-svn
lib32-llvm-svn
libclc-svn
libgxim
imsettings
im-chooser
https://aur4.arc
On 19-06-15 03:36, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Em 18-06-2015 19:27, LoneVVolf escreveu:
Should we allow such programs in AUR ?
You're mistaking a tool for its uses. I have some packages on the AUR
that could also help protect criminals. Should I also remove these
packages from AUR? Let&
Hi,
While browsing AUR4 orphaned pacakges, i noticed cudahashcat with
description "Worlds fastest password cracker with dictionary mutation
engine" .
There are atleast 2 more packages from the same upstream,
http://hashcat.net/oclhashcat/ .
I realise it and can be useful for people that fo
On 17-06-15 14:17, Tom Swartz wrote:
Asking for a response from the OP: Do you not have other network access
available to maintain your AUR packages? More to the point, are you
maintaining packages on AUR as part of your official responsibilities? Or
just in spare time? Leaving aside, for the mom
On 12-06-15 10:01, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Also, we don't care
about packages that were very popular a year ago and are no longer used
today.
Low number of new votes != not used anymore
Many high quality, useful packages target a specific group of users.
Does that make them less valuable ?
LVV
On 09-06-15 21:56, Storm Dragon wrote:
Hi,
I am thinking of packaging some audio games. The problem is, they
will require a sapi5 voice to work. I can create a package for that
too, except I think it requires something like c:\System32. Is there a
way to do this system wide instead of using a
On 13-04-15 12:12, Konstantin P. wrote:
I have a program with one gsettings schema and 2 binaries. Schema required
for both, but binaries does not require each other. How packaging tech will
be best?
Assuming you want to be able to install the binaries separately,
i'd use a split package with 3
On 01-04-15 07:41, Det wrote:
My personal pool of suggestions is as follows:
- chromium-continuous
- chromium-continuous-bin
- chromium-nightly
- chromium-nightly-bin (only 3 packages follow this scheme [5])
- chromium-snapshot
- chromium-snapshot-bin
I would preferer omitting the '-bin', but I
On 02-03-15 10:54, Florian Bruhin wrote:
* gt [2015-03-02 15:11:45 +0530]:
Hi guys,
I maintain a package dex-editor-git in the AUR. It was recently reported to me
that it conflicts with a package named dex present in the community repository.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dex-editor-git
On 23-01-15 00:23, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Let me elaborate just a bit: There currently isn't a bcusdk package
base in the AUR, so a new package base is created upon package
submission. That new package base contains a package eibd which is
already part of the package base eibd, though. Since a
On 02-12-14 07:07, Nowaker wrote:
A custom field in PKGBUILD that AUR will understand would really come
in handy. Something like this:
pkgissues='https://github.com/Nowaker/aur-packages/issues' type="submit" value="Add Comment"> If you can't build the
package, or the package is broken, plea
On 21-11-14 10:51, Martti Kühne wrote:
Architecture-specific software has been a niche for almost decades now
since cpus became satisfyingly fast to run compiled code. Maybe I just
personally don't use assembly widely enough and hence don't see the
problem. cheers! mar77i
Martti,
the proble
Perhaps we could treat the aur-requests more like a bug tracker ?
a possible flow :
request is filed and gets unassigned status
TUs review unassigned requests
If they feel they are right person to handle it, they assign it to
themselves.
request status changes to assigned, and the TU is now r
On 25-07-14 18:20, Christian Hesse wrote:
Exactly. Probably 'sticky comment' is a better name for what I want.
I would also like to have the option fro sticky comments.
example :
I maintain cndrvcups-lb package, but there's also a cndrvcups-lb-bin
package.
For some users my package works fin
On 26-06-14 03:42, Storm Dragon wrote:
Hi,
the package snowballz is out of date and doesn't seem to have a
maintainer. The problems with the PKGBUILD are minor, just package
names need updating. I would be willing to take on this package if no
one else wants it. thing is, I can fix the current
Hi,
Please remove my xf86-video-intel-dri-git [1] .
The functionality provided by this out-of-tree build has been merged to
master.
For those needing it, install xf86-video-intel-git instead.
LW
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-intel-dri3-git/
On 27-03-14 10:24, David Phillips wrote:
Hi all, I adopted https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trayfreq/ a while
ago to nurture it back into health after seeing that it was trying to
use outdated files in /proc/ amongst other fatal bugs. The owners
haven't updated their sourceforge in a while (fiv
Hi,
please delete canon-cndrvcups package [1] .
It's an orphan, outdated and not used by any other package afaict.
Lone_Wolf
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/canon-cndrvcups/
Hi,
please delete mesa-r600-r700-git package [1].
reasons :
orphan
last updated in dec 2011
flagged out-of-date since june 10, 2013
There are several maintained alternatives, like aur mesa-git package
[2], Lordheavy's unofficial mesa-git repo [3] and my own
mesa-r300-r600-radeonsi-git packag
Hi,
I am the maintainer of the cndrvcups-lb package.
First, I apologise for breaking the thread but i had aur-general mailing
options set to digest, so can't reply in thread (changed to single now).
After I found out Allen Choong had uploaded the package canon-ufr and
this provided the binar
40 matches
Mail list logo