Re: [aur-general] Wrong E-Mail Adress at registration used

2020-10-10 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 at 08:14:01, Matthias 'garionion' Detsch via aur-general wrote: > Would it be possible, that someone could please unlock "my" username? Done, please use [1] to send yourself a password reset email. Your may also want to consider adding a backup email address to your profile, j

Re: [aur-general] Resignation as Trusted User

2020-09-08 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 at 10:44:53, Filipe LaĆ­ns via aur-general wrote: > I think he should be set as 'Developer', not normal user. Done.

[aur-general] aurweb 5.0.0 released

2020-03-27 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
Dear aurweb contributors and users, aurweb 5.0.0 has just been released! You can now add a secondary email address that can be used to recover your account in case access to the primary email address is lost. Reset keys for an account are always sent to both the primary and the backup email addre

Re: [aur-general] Traceback from aurweb upon git push

2020-02-10 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 17:18:16, Chris Billington via aur-general wrote: > remote: raise child_exception_type(errno_num, err_msg, err_filename) > remote: PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '' Should be fixed. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Re: [aur-general] git push failed 8-(

2020-01-30 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 13:34:41, J. Scheurich wrote: > $ git clone ssh://a...@archlinux.org/white_dune.git It's a...@aur.archlinux.org, not a...@archlinux.org.

[aur-general] AUR VCS cleanup

2019-12-07 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
Here's a list of VCS duplicates reported by `aurdupes -V`. I did not check for false positives. Maybe somebody can go through that list and either delete all obsolete packages or file deletion requests: 1pass (VCS) * 1pass-git http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/1pass-git/ * 1pass-hg http://aur.arch

[aur-general] AUR cleanup

2019-12-07 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
Here's an up-to-date list of duplicates reported by `aurdupes -A`. I did not check for false positives. Maybe somebody can go through that list and either remove duplicate packages or file deletion requests. I'll post a separate list with VCS duplicates. atlassian-plugin-sdk * atlassian-plugin-sdk

Re: [aur-general] aur client

2019-10-30 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 at 11:04:07, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > Would it be good enough for you if I renamed it from "aur" to > "aur-client"? So at least it won't sound like the AUR itself? We currently only block aur and aurweb. There is some gray area but I'd suggest to use another name that d

Re: [aur-general] aur client

2019-10-29 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 16:07:34, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > Lukas Fleischer: > > Another one is that we'd prefer you to not use a name that sounds very > > official for a very unofficial project. > That sounds reasonable in theory, but in practice it does nothing. The > software does its work

Re: [aur-general] aur client

2019-10-29 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 11:20:27, Alberto Salvia Novella via aur-general wrote: > That would make sense if the package was misleading, but "aur" is an aur > client for publishing to the AUR. It couldn't have clearer naming. There are other reasons you might not want to use this name. One is confl

[aur-general] aurweb 4.8.0 released

2019-10-25 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
Dear aurweb contributors and users, This is a bit of a late announcement but we are pleased to announce that aurweb 4.8.0 has been released last week! Several bugs have been fixed, we made some significant performance improvements by caching results of expensive database queries, and a simple CAP

Re: [aur-general] Spammers in AUR user comments

2019-04-11 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 15:13:32, Daniel M. Capella via aur-general wrote: > On April 5, 2019 7:54:44 AM EDT, NicoHood wrote: > >Should and how can we better protect ourselves from spam comments? > > Perhaps we should add CAPTCHA for account registrations. IIRC, we had an issue with spam bots sev

Re: [aur-general] pushing new package to aur fails

2019-01-21 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 at 21:48:46, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > [...] > > remote: Traceback (most recent call last): > > remote: File "hooks/update", line 11, in > > remote: load_entry_point('aurweb==4.7.0', 'console_scripts', > > 'aurweb-git-update')() > > remote: File > > "/usr/li

Re: [aur-general] About bullying in our community

2018-10-31 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
Dear community, I am writing on behalf of the Arch Linux team. Despite the initial radio silence, we have been talking about this thread internally and we are still discussing the consequences. We apologize for any emails and actions from our team which may have been inappropriate or disrespectf

Re: [aur-general] Wrong ownership notification

2018-08-10 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 at 10:47:02, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 8/10/18 4:44 AM, Florian Bruhin wrote: > [...] > > However, the package never was orphaned, and at least in the AUR > > webinterface I'm still listed as a maintainer... huh? > > You're not the only one, I gave a patch to lfl

[aur-general] aurweb 4.7.0 released

2018-07-07 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
Dear aurweb contributors and users, We are pleased to announce that aurweb 4.7.0 has been released! New features are the possibility to search by depends as well as an API rate limit in the RPC interface. Moreover, co-maintainers can now remove themselves from the co-maintainer list. This releas

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

2018-01-21 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 at 21:40:43, Xyne wrote: > On 2018-01-21 10:04 +0100 > Lukas Fleischer via aur-general wrote: > > >So you suggest to remove the first part of the condition (before the > >"OR") altogether? > > I made no such suggestion. By your logic,

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

2018-01-21 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 at 04:24:49, Xyne wrote: > > The intent of the first sectionm before the "OR", is to measure any sort of > > activity. Updating a package, voting or posting a comment shows that the TU > > is still logging in to the AUR and thus active in some sense. The point of > > the first s

Re: [aur-general] Special Removal of an Inactive TU: speps

2018-01-21 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 at 04:07:06, Xyne wrote: > Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > > >Yes, it is a bit ambiguous. The discussion in #archlinux-tu concluded that > >the > >voting being an the AUR was just happenstance and intent of the section was > >that voting not be included in point 2. With

Re: [aur-general] Special Removal of an Inactive TU: speps

2018-01-18 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 at 22:05:10, Thorsten Toepper wrote: > [...] > Whether the votes happens in the AUR web interface or on a separate > private mailing list is unimportant for the real process I agree, just > at the moment it's the AUR webinterface and the second point is simply > not too well for

Re: [aur-general] AUR account registration failed

2018-01-01 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
On Mon, 01 Jan 2018 at 16:51:42, Mauro Santos via aur-general wrote: > On 01-01-2018 14:33, Ian Bashford wrote: > > Hi Lukas, > > > > Thanks for replying quickly. I haven't received your direct mail either... > > (I've checked spam). > > It should be the same address I'm using to post to the list

Re: [aur-general] AUR account registration failed

2018-01-01 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
On Mon, 01 Jan 2018 at 14:56:01, Ian Bashford wrote: > I tried creating an aur account ianb, registered for ianbashford \at/ > gmail.com > I didn't receive the confirmation mail, and password resets don't send > anything either. > Would an admin be able to see what's wrong? Replied off-list.

[aur-general] aurweb 4.6.0 released

2017-12-03 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
Dear aurweb contributors and users, We are pleased to announce the release of aurweb 4.6.0! This release brings a lot of improvements to the comment functionality. You can now use basic Markdown syntax to format your comments. Commit hashes to the Git repository of the package and references to F