There's pacman -D, if you only want to install a package to pacman's database.
cheers!
mar77i
I'm sure nobody cares, but anyone mentioning that so-called AUR helper
that pronounces closely enough to rotten milk belongs banned off
either AUR or this mailing list. Seriously, this has been going on too
long and I want to see the moderators and devs acknowledge that the
time to move on has long
Update on this topic: so, it turns out OP appears to have done a few
things he didn't tell us about.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Edward Torvalds wrote:
> I am not able to install any package using 'yaourt' (although I can
> using pacman).
> No matter what package I try to install I end up wi
Discussion pending in [0]. Can we go on on github?
cheers!
mar77i
[0] https://github.com/archlinuxfr/yaourt/issues/209
I forwarded your email to the two yaourt devs as noted in [0].
cheers!
mar77i
[0] https://archlinux.fr/yaourt-en
I'm not sure about this comment [0], it should likely be moderated
simply for being overly complex. I think it's silly not to use a
pastebin or even open a new package with the proposed updates
temporarily, so everyone could benefit from the changes immediately.
That said, I actually wonder whether
I want that file too.
Come on, just give the damn file already and let's get this over with.
cheers!
mar77i
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Ole Jon Bjørkum wrote:
> Martti Kühne: Very mature. Please read my previous post about the language
> here. Trying to be polite here.
>
I tried, right there. After Doug and Levente and Tinu and everyone and
I kept telling you the same, there's reall
LOUD ANNOYED SIGH.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Ole Jon Bjørkum wrote:
[...an awful lot about attitude...]
> I'll make my package build the library instead, or add to my wiki page that
> people should install libgcrypt11 from AUR when installing my package, or
> else it won't work. I'll prefer the first option, b
Do this:
source_i686=("http://example.com/release-${pkgver}-i386.tar.gz";)
md5sums_i686=('ffeeddccbbaa99887766554433221100')
source_x86_64=("http://example.com/release-${pkgver}-x86_64.tar.gz";)
md5sums_x86_64=('00112233445566778899aabbccddeeff')
package() {
local tarball="${source_i686[0]}"
Let me just reiterate not to install such tools unless you know
whether in your local jurisdiction they are not somehow banned and
whether you should care about taking such risks.
cheers!
mar77i
You're a bit late, why not call yourself "june"?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Tom Swartz wrote:
>
> To answer your questions:
>
> 1. Yes, I do have network access outside of my corporate environment.
> However, much (READ: all) of the project maintenance and code lives on and
> is performed on my corporate servers.
>
> 2. I currently maintai
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> No, and valuable != popular :)
>
> Any popularity contest is going to be biased in some way. This is as
> good a bias as any other.
>
And let's leave completely out of focus that the bias that is needed
for a package to enter the official
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Storm Dragon wrote:
> Hi,
> I am thinking of packaging some audio games. The problem is, they will
> require a sapi5 voice to work. I can create a package for that too, except I
> think it requires something like c:\System32. Is there a way to do this
> system wide
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Lukas Fleischer
wrote:
> The aur4.archlinux.org database will be reset and synced with
> aur.archlinux.org on June 8th. We disabled the AUR 4 setup to make sure
> people don't start uploading their packages now (and forget about the
> actual migration period). If yo
For a stub header file it's not necessary to create a different
package, unless in the obvious cases when its more than one of a
considerable amount of data, required by more than one other piece of
software, or a complete/self-contained piece of software.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Sebastian Lau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the moment I'm trying to rewrite grive [1], because its maintainer
> did not migrate it to the new Google APIs.
> After reviewing the code, I decided, that maybe using the google api cpp
> client libraries would be a good choice si
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Rafael Ferreira wrote:
> One too much lazy solution (but works) is to grep one server from
> mirrorlist (e.g.: first) and get specifically the prefix of the URL,
> which will be completed in the source array:
> _srcurl=`grep -m 1 ^Server /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist`
See
https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python2-flask-restful/request/
https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/qtadb/request/
TUs now have some kind of console where they probably have buttons to
do stuff with packages.
cheers!
mar77i
Do you always extend your thoughts this far? Did you ever lose
yourself in your thoughts?
What happens if you're not wrong enough so others could point it out to you?
We both know you depend on your perception to understand what is going
on and wrong.
But stuff as derogatory as you quoted does no
A country's laws doesn't say whether its citizens are idiots. It only
gives an impression about its leaders.
Nice try tho for someone who blindly trusts his data.
cheers!
mar77i
Comments have a timestamp. You can, after all, just compare the
comment date with the package's upload date.
And then again. We could actually have comments more recent than the
last source package upload have a wee bit stronger contrast and maybe
*bold* font.
cheers!
mar77i
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:58 PM, LoneVVolf wrote:
>
>
> Martti,
>
> the problem is not assembly in the source code, , but the fact that all
> compilers deliver machine-specific code .
> compile a C program on an arm processor, try to run the binary on a x86
> processor.
> It will fail always.
>
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:41 AM, David Phillips wrote:
> I wonder how opinions on this matter would change if ten thousand
> arm-only packages were dropped on the AUR overnight?
>
What are the odds of that happening? Also, how could a further
decision not handle that case at said point? Archite
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Justin Dray wrote:
> Good question. One of my packages got deleted last year because it was arm
> only. I no longer used any arm systems, and was just maintaining it, so I
> didn't bother chasing it up. But I'm also interested in the answer to that.
>
I think AR
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 12:11 AM, Lex Black wrote:
>
> So I suppose it was removed some time ago, but remained in the mirror.
> Should such cases be reported or is there a script checking for such
> things from time to time?
>
Generally, IIRC removed from aur doesn't mean the files are gone, but
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:00 AM, wrote:
> This is a reminder, sent out once a month, about your
> lists.archlinux.org mailing list memberships. It includes your
> subscription info and how to use it to change it or unsubscribe from a
> list.
>
> You can visit the URLs to change your membership st
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
>
> And I just realized you might want to use it outside of RockboxUtility and
> create your own voice files by external means. In any case, your deps and
> makedeps are wrong, the provides line is useless, you're installing ghost
> files (the
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Florian Bruhin wrote:
> There seems to be some problem regarding comments on
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/baikal
>
> BunBum did a comment yesterday for which I got a mail but which isn't
> on the page (then they posted another one, the one with "My comment
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Fabien Dubosson
wrote:
> [...]
>
> But it has not the same meaning. Maintainer's name gives me the
> information that I am installing a package that claims to be provided by
> this maintainer, or uploaded with this maintainer account. GPG
> signatures will add the c
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Eugenio M. Vigo wrote:
> Alexander,
> I'll post a link to your response wherever I can. Awesome explanation.
> Cheers,
> Eu.
Something to reference in the arch wiki, I guess. I'm busy now, if
there's a volunteer, or later...
cheers!
mar77i
+1 I also wanted to contribute to this thread.
To quote the whole internet: I wouldn't fit into this email.
Cheers!
mar77i
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
>
> However, the webdesign at vbsimple.net* is crazy and I hope you never
> get the chance to redesign the archlinux.org webpage**. ;)
>
I'm partially interested what that would look like for a good laugh... xD
cheers!
mar77i
I haven't understood the deal. Did you announce this already, or do
you still want to announce something or are you announcing the
introduction of announcements on the mailing list and not the comments
(which aren't the comments) of announcements through comments (but not
as such)?
Hello aur-general,
How can I remove Mr. MYERS' musings from my inbox?
cheers!
mar77i
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:51 PM, [AUR-ML] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How about an ArchLinux "Wiki Community Day" each month eg.? Where we
> come together to improve the readability of certain Wiki pages and
> delete old stuff? Raises awareness and improves Wiki regularly.
>
> What do you think?
I think arc
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Storm Dragon
wrote:
> Do you get paid for tweeting? I do: http://spn.tw/r11uj
> < http://www.stormdragon.us/ >
Not to nitpick on your signature, but did you know you send the above?
I figured you might be glad to know, most of us wou
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Gesh wrote:
> Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but wouldn't a design like the
> following give you this paper trail?
> * Add a "flag for deletion/merge/orphan" button on the AUR - possibly
> subject to restrictions requiring the package to have been marked
Dear TUs
These two packages are ready for your coup de grâce. Sources of both
are no longer in the ether. UAE was superseded by FS-UAE for quite a
while already.
[0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/amigashell/
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/uae/
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Amish wrote:
>
>
>
> But there is no e-mail mentioned in PKGBUILD. So I am not sure who to send
> e-mail to.
>
Users' email addresses are linked on their AUR profiles.
Even if the current maintainer is not mentioned in the pkgbuild,
you can find it if you click on
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Felix Yan wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 13:34:59 David Phillips wrote:
>> Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/multimon/ as it
>> appears to have been orphaned and superseeded by another package, as
>> noted in the comments.
>
That comment is
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:59 PM, wrote:
> On 2014-04-04 07:46, Borja wrote:
>>
>> Hi chaps!
>>
>> I would like to requestthe removal the one of this two PKGBUILD:
>>
>> - sysdig
>> - sysdig-git
>>
>> I've comitted both of them by mistake. I would say that maybe it's better
>> to
>>
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Evert Van Petegem
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I currently maintain the netbeans-beta package in the AUR. I was wondering,
> since netbeans was updated to 8.0 today (not yet in the official
> repositories), whether I should leave it at the latest development release
> (rc1) o
Nice of you to include the original context a second time.
cheers!
mar77i
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Martti Kühne wrote:
> [...] You have a full egg with .AURINFO
at least, in an ideal world, you *could*, and probably *should* have
an AUR-normalized PKGBUILD instead of plethoras of more files that all
do all-too similar things for all-too similar tools.
che
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Lukas Fleischer
wrote:
[...]
>
> So, you're basically evaluating all PKGBUILD variables on the client
> side, then print them into a file called "PKGBUILD.gen"? That's exactly
> what .AURINFO is, except it has another file name.
Except in my idea, delivering the
It may sound like two dumb or unrelated ideas, but I figure they would
become relevant to the discussion at one point anyway. So, let's look
at the question we're avoiding all the time: What is the problem with
PKGBUILDs? That it's not limited to a subset of sh?
There seem to be regularly efforts
You're so deep.
(sic! ref: [0])
cheers!
mar77i
[0] http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1311/18114.html
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Kyle wrote:
>
> If someone has just joined the list and wants to read all the previous
> messages on a specific topic, I believe this list has an archive of all
> p
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Robert Knauer wrote:
> Hello,
> I want to ask for deletion of my two packages freediameter[1] and
> freediameter-hg[2]. I submitted them and I'm the current maintainer, but
> I'm not using FreeDiameter anymore and each package has only one vote
> (by me).
> So I thi
Because it messes up the natural reading order and prevents you from
following the context.
> Why is top posting bad?
cheers!
mar77i
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Jeremy Audet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please disown ruby-ruby_parser. [1] I emailed the maintainer about his
> package on November 19th (exactly two weeks ago), flagged his package out
> of date over two weeks ago, and commented on his package over two weeks
> ago. I've rec
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 08:37:48AM +, aur-not...@archlinux.org wrote:
> from https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/funcy-git/
> Scimmia wrote:
>
> You might want to mention that the tools are for python. I assume
> python is a dep, then? A makedep at the very least.
>
> You're cloning everything
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Nowaker wrote:
>> acpi_call-git's PKGBUILD [1] is currently broken, as it uses a patch
>> that is not necessary for long time now. This was commented, but the
>> maintainer doesn't fixed nor replied about. Please disown it, so I can
>> fix it.
>
>
> It looks like t
yay snake!
I have an unfinished one lying around on a... much more unpopular
platform than pygame. meh, let's see if I can get my old buddy's java
homework (which mostly I ended up doing) from him. Hmm, that reminds
me, he reported heavy disk failures last time we communicated...
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Ido Rosen wrote:
> Hi,
> I just submitted two packages to AUR
[...]
>
> PS: I am unsubscribing from aur-general now so please CC my email address
> on replies meant for me.
To tell you this much, this way you will miss any requests on your
packages which go to
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Charles Pigott
wrote:
> While you're at it, can you disown devscripts too? (
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/devscripts/) Similar situation
>
>
> On 16 September 2013 19:24, Charles Pigott
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, can you please disown the maintainer of debhelper (
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
[...]
> If the proposal is accepted and implemented, how to finally
> remove the AUR packages ?
>
>
By asking here as well, acording to [0].
cheers!
mar77i
[0] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR#Other_requests
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
[...]
> A month ago i wrote to the published mail address of the
> maintainer "dreieck". No reaction since then.
>
Technically, 2 weeks after writing the email you could have come here
to ask for orphaning. That is still possible and a TU wi
SCNR: but I want my bikeshed in filibuster blue...
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara
wrote:
>
> I don't really think so. Atleast libav-git works well and doesn't break
> a single package I have in my systems and I don't think ffmpeg-git does
> eather. Same goes for the other git stuff too.
>
Any references on why and how this is
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Vitor Eiji Justus Sakaguti
wrote:
>
> commandlinefu.com comes to mind. There's a client in AUR called fu-git
> but I never used it.
A client that lets you download oneliners? I smell another one-liner... :-D
cheers!
mar77i
Hi list
There's no point in having [0] around, since community/lmms passes
-USE=vst to compilation...
cheers!
mar77i
[0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lmms-vst
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 09:33:34AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
[...]
>
> It's a German idiom. http://www.dict.cc/?s=nicht+so+hei%C3%9F+gegessen
>
A recent research I made on this topic made it pretty clear to me that the
German idiom is a well-integrated Hungarian import.
cheers!
mar77i
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Dicebot wrote:
>
> It is nothing of real importance but question is, what harm does
> explicit versioning do?
Correct me if I overlooked it, but from what I have read here, but I
have yet to see an argument that applies to the specific case here.
AUR users are fa
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Edoardo Maria Elidoro
wrote:
> I'm writing here just to have some feedback about this "issue" and
> maybe to encourage someone to adopt it and fix it. I don't feel like
> it's something I will be able to do otherwise I'd have already adopted
> it.
>
It's dead, th
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 7:45 PM, |^ `/ () () | ( (-) |
wrote:
> Hello! I was wondering if you could possibly transfer my ownership of [...]
If you want Evan to pick the package up, you can orphan it yourself.
Also I hope the poor TUs have a way to execute SQL queries for this
kind of stuff (list-to-csv, csv-to-in-clause, execute update with
in-clause, done)
cheers!
mar77i
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> It says (translation from Croatian): Wrong name: Only small letters allowed.
can you paste the pkgbuild on a pastebin?
cheers!
mar77i
THIS THREAD NEEDS SO MUCH MORE CAPSLOCK!!!1!1!!11!!!
scnr.
cheers!
mar77i
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Stefan Husmann
wrote:
[...]
>
> this gives :
> [haawda@frege 4.1]$ LANG=C makepkg
> ==> Making package: emacs-xwidget-bzr 101273-1 (Thu Apr 4
> 10:19:00 CEST 2013)
> ==> Checking runtime dependencies...
> ==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
> ==> Retrieving sou
AFAIK PKGBUILDs can still implement their own VCS downloads in
build(), so, why not have it only pull the relevant paths?
A quick google gave me [1], you get the idea...
cheers!
mar77i
[1]
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/50945/can-you-do-a-partial-checkout-with-subversion#
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Anntoin Wilkinson wrote:
> I'm surprised that Pacman doesn't seem to handle this case at the
> moment.
>
I'm surprised this isn't percieved as a feature. With most other
package managers, especially dpkg/apt I couldn't naturally interact
because they internally
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
>
> I was referring to the fact that it said "registration" form. ;)
As a matter of fact, I noticed that too, that in the profile page when
one is logged in, it seems there's the same source file being used and
no test if one is trying to
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Christoph Seitz
wrote:
> Oooh,
>
> I forgot my username. ;) go2sh
>
> Regards
> Chris
Btw, tus can match your email address with your username, afaik...
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Phillip Smith wrote:
> On 22 February 2013 17:32, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
>
>> On 02/22/2013 06:57 AM, Kevin Vesga wrote:
>> > Please delete minitunes [1] as the project's name has changed and a new
>> > package [2] has been made for it.
>> >
>> > [1] https:/
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:21 PM, arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I came to this issue when building android:
>
> make: execvp: /bin/bash: Argument list too long
>
> From what I understand, the reason for this annoyance is that Linux kernel
> has a limitation of bytes it can process through
On 3/18/13, Jonathan Arnold wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 16:48:44 +0100
> Ike Devolder wrote:
>
>> Op zondag 17 maart 2013 15:30:28 schreef Jakub Klinkovský:
>> > Please disown offlineimap-git[1]. The package is out-of-date for
>> > more than a year and doesn't build.
>> >
>> > [1]: https://aur.a
IMWO TUs can wait 2 weeks after sending an email like all other normal people.
This isn't schoolyard people, come on.
cheers!
mar77i
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Rob Til Freedmen
wrote:
>
> Still not fixed properly:
> rtmidi-config and pkg-config rtmidi return different flags :(
>
> I needed this package to release midisnoop on AUR and posted my pkg src
> to him for testing purpose - now he kind of hijacked midisnoop
> whi
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:22 AM, Vítor Miguel Miranda Ferreira
wrote:
> I guess then I'll have to wait until you rename the package in order to
> upload the renamed and rebuild source tarball. Right?
>
>
erm..
Just in case I'm following your thoughts correctly: TUs don't do that. [1]
Upload the p
then asked questions
about bugs and limitations. I'm writing so many words I hope you're
fine with my apology it's not my intention to waste your time.
aww, fuck it.
cheers!
mar77i
On 3/5/13, Martti Kühne wrote:
> the outdated packaging already posed as misleading for some us
the outdated packaging already posed as misleading for some users, as
the switch to git has been well advertised by upstream. it came up
that people believed to be fully up to date when asking upstream,
altough svn had long run dry.
otoh, I could have said something myself earlier to keep things cl
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Stefan Husmann
wrote:
>
> I do not get your point here. Why should transmission-cli-svn be removed?
> How can a package based on svn be aout of date?
> Why not just orphan it?
>
I tried to write a new version of the PKGBUILD, including a rename to
transmission-svn-
the package was flagged out of date and basing a new (-svn-cli)
package would be too little change.
cheers!
mar77i
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/transmission-cli-svn/
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Jorge Barroso
wrote:
> Hi, this package [1] it's orphaned and it's an abandoned project, could you
> remove it?
>
> Thanks
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-cups-manager/
Please merge [1] into [2] which has the correct name
cheers!
mar77i
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/diskimage64-svn/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/diskimagery64-svn/
On 3/3/13, Phillip Smith wrote:
> While it is a lot of data, I agree that it shouldn't be that difficult to
> recover. What am I missing? Any chance those of us who aren't TU's can get
> access to the file?
>
I also came close to that question, which indeed is kind of obvious.
cheers!
mar77i
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:02 PM, oliver wrote:
>
> Yes.
>
> Why I was looking for poularity?
> Because I thought, it *might* be an indicator (even a weak one)
> about some kind of quality.
> Some libraries or tools might not be used anymore, because there
> are newer or faster or better libs for
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Connor Behan wrote:
[...]
>
> INSERT INTO `PackageComments` VALUES (17,46,68,'ruby bindings for
> fastcgi',1113164127,68),(28,69,65,'A countdown timer applet for the
> GNOME panel.',1113178883,0);
>
> Except that line there is 161 characters and contains two comment
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Zhengyu Xu wrote:
> Dear TUs,
>
> Please help me to disown the package: gtk-theme-evolve at [1]. This package
> has been flagged out-of-date for more than two weeks without any update.
> Even the original author (satya164) of the gtk-theme asked the maintainer to
>
greetings
please remove my package [0]. I'm not using myself any more and the
issue and hence reason for the patch has gone away for a long time.
cheers!
mar77i
[0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/virtualbox-modules-noqueue-patch/
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Tai-Lin Chu wrote:
> LinkedIn
>
>
>
>
> Discussion,
>
> I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
>
> - Tai-Lin
>
> Tai-Lin Chu
> Software Developer at KokoChe
> San Francisco Bay Area
>
> Confirm that you know Tai-Lin Chu:
> https:/
On Thursday, January 10, 2013 01:57:12 PM Jagmjp Janpgm wrote:
> Couldmuffin-wm be merged into muffin, as the latter has not been updated
> for over a year an a half and has been out of date for six months?
good to hear human input from that direction... ;-)
welcome back to the living.
cheers!
m
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 10:13 PM, canatan bir wrote:
> hi.im newbie.this my first message.i try to clean up the trash in aur(aur
> contains a lot of trash).packages below:all are flagged and orphan.
>
welcome from another user. I can't remove packages, but...
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Paul Weingardt
wrote:
> Hello,
> I just got a comment on my git-cola package, stating that the
> compilation fails, when the path to the PKGBUILD contains a UTF-8 symbol
> like the Euro "€" symbol.
>
> Example:
> The PKGBUILD is located under "/home/paul/€uro/". "
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Andreas Wagner
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have uploaded dmenu-git and and dmc-git to replace dmenu-hg and dmc-hg
> because suckless.org has moved to git.
>
> Could someone here delete the following packages:
>
> dmenu-hg
>
> dmc-hg
>
> Eventually, we should move the res
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
> [...]
> Hello,
>
> Thank you, I just wanted to get something black-on-white to point the
> maintainer of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/popular-packages/ to.
>
> He was requested by an TU to not bundle the source in the tarball a
> mon
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Stefan J. Betz wrote:
>
> Never enable any service on install ;-)
>
+1
Please keep arch passive.
No automated configs, no automated breakage I'll have to search for.
Thank you.
Cheers
mar77i
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo