On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Ionut Biru biru.io...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/16/2010 06:12 PM, hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
Please have a look here:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards#Submitting_Packages_to_the_AUR
It says:
Please add a comment line to the top of
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Philipp Überbacher
hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
It's not possible for me to change it, hence this mail. Seems I forgot
to mention this..
I can make the update...the question is do we want the maintainer at
the top or bottom of the list. I've always appended the
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Ionut Biru biru.io...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/16/2010 07:18 PM, Thayer Williams wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Philipp Überbacher
hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
It's not possible for me to change it, hence this mail. Seems I forgot
to mention
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 6:58 PM, v...@uni-bonn.de wrote:
Further when someone disowns a PKGBUILD for some reason, he also drops the
responsibility for this package. So what's the reason of adding two or
more persons to the PKGBUILD who actually don't have anything more to do
with it?
To anyone interested, attached is a partially completed PKGBUILD and
.install file for making a ttf-tahoma package. As some of you know,
Tahoma was removed from the ttf-ms-fonts package back in February. I had
intended to dump a PKGBUILD for the Tahoma font to the AUR, but haven't
had the time
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Angel Velásquez an...@archlinux.com.ve wrote:
Best wishes for you, and I hope the project gets more enthusiastic
people (like the great community that we have) everyday, and maybe
(who knows?) I will got involved again.
Though we never had an opportunity to
Gentlemen,
Little if any good can come from this debate. You both did what you
felt was necessary at the time. You each may not agree with the
others methods, however the net result is the same. Let us remain
civil and leave it at.
Thayer
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Loui Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:34:32AM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
So just to be clear here:
You want to remove the developer type from the AUR? So
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 2:53 AM, Phil Dillon-Thiselton
I'm well confused here. We haven't taken anything at all, we've
provided a link to the software. I think he thinks the tarball in that
AUR is the source, which it
