Re: [aur-general] Prefered way to create users/groups and handle files ownership

2014-02-04 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 25.01.2014 17:13, schrieb Maxime Gauduin: > The reason why permissions should be set in the PKGBUILD is because that > way pacman can track them. Then it's up to the maintainer to choose > UIDs/GIDs that do not conflict with official packages, and to the user to > check that they don't already u

Re: [aur-general] [HEADS-UP] Meta data and split package support in the AUR

2014-04-07 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 05.04.2014 14:38, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: > AUR 3.0.0 will be able to read metadata from source packages. These > metadata will be read from a file called .AURINFO (contained in the > source tarball). Dave wrote several tools [1], including mkaurball which > can be used to automatically build a

Re: [aur-general] had to change ~.ssh/config from archlinux.com to archlinux.org

2016-03-04 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 04.03.2016 um 23:55 schrieb David McInnis: > Hi gang, > > I apparently have had my .ssh/config mis-configured for some time. > Today the AUR suddenly stopped accepting my git commits. It gave me the > following error: > > Permission denied (publickey). > fatal: Could not read from rem

Re: [aur-general] kernel updates render package obsolete

2008-11-17 Thread Thomas Bächler
Mads Michelsen schrieb: So I guess my questions are: 1) Is there some way around the module becoming outdated with each and every kernel update? and if not You only have to rebuild with major updates (which happen every 3 months). 2) For myself, I can just keep the source code on my drive and

[aur-general] Packages with libpcap dependency need a rebuild

2008-12-03 Thread Thomas Bächler
Soon (today or tomorrow), libpcap 1.0.0 will move to core. All community packages depending on libpcap will need a rebuild (iftop is among them, no idea if there are more). The rebuilds probably won't be necessary for each version anymore, as the libpcap.so has no a sane SONAME (.so.1) instead

Re: [aur-general] Packages with libpcap dependency need a rebuild

2008-12-11 Thread Thomas Bächler
Thomas Bächler schrieb: Soon (today or tomorrow), libpcap 1.0.0 will move to core. All community packages depending on libpcap will need a rebuild (iftop is among them, no idea if there are more). The rebuilds probably won't be necessary for each version anymore, as the libpcap.so has

Re: [aur-general] Use of sudo in pkgbuild

2009-04-07 Thread Thomas Bächler
Laurie Clark-Michalek schrieb: Hi, I've been working on the splashy-creator package (updating it to 2.2), and had got it working, when I realised I had a potential problem. I needed to use sudo in the pkgbuild, and so far, I have never seen it used in a package. Is this OK, and/or is there away

[aur-general] The [community-testing] repository

2009-06-30 Thread Thomas Bächler
I think this has been requested and discussed a few times and I talked to several people about it, so I want to outline my ideas here: When moving the community db scripts to the new svn-based scripts, a community-testing repository should be created. With the new scripts, handling this is inc

Re: [aur-general] Recommended Encoding for PKGBUILDS?

2009-07-02 Thread Thomas Bächler
Xavier schrieb: This is web server (lighttpd) setting again. It's possible to specify that files with .diff or .patch extension are actually of type text/plain and not application/octet-stream , but this was not done. I am not sure what you can do on the client / web browser side. Nothing rea

Re: [aur-general] About AUR Translation zh_CN

2009-07-09 Thread Thomas Bächler
Mod_Gao schrieb: actually i made a complete translation at 2008 but i am not submitted, i want to do a LAMP and do some tests for my translation but i got failures on LAMP, so i disappointed..and i could not found it today(maybe on my DVD+R). Most of us can't even read the signs, let alone

[aur-general] Enable ACLs on sigurd

2009-08-11 Thread Thomas Bächler
Can someone who is all-powerful please run: mount -o remount,acl / and add the "acl" option to the appropriate line in /etc/fstab? I noticed that I couldn't set ACLs on sigurd this morning, and it would come in very handy sometimes. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] out-of-date notifications

2009-08-20 Thread Thomas Bächler
Abhishek Dasgupta schrieb: Is it possible to have out-of-date notifications to be Cc-ed to the maintainer? Then I can check arch-notifications web interface for the other notifications and still get out-of-date notifications for my packages. Abhishek Last time I checked, they only went to arc

Re: [aur-general] Extra/AUR duplicates

2009-08-23 Thread Thomas Bächler
Stefan Husmann schrieb: Well, words in AUR is different from words in extra. Then it must have a different name. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] what about R?

2009-09-25 Thread Thomas Bächler
johnea schrieb: So I've got a PKGBUILD I'd like to upload, but it produces a package called: Er? pacman -Si r signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] overriding architecture in split packages

2009-09-28 Thread Thomas Bächler
Xyne schrieb: I'm (sort of) cross-posting but I'm hoping to get a quick answer so I can start this huge upload: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=81143 Right now, neither dbscripts nor makepkg support this, so you should go with a separate PKGBUILD. signature.asc Description: OpenP

Re: [aur-general] script to check a binary package for architecture-independence

2009-11-02 Thread Thomas Bächler
Chris Brannon schrieb: Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: Hello There is no attach here. The script is here: http://the-brannons.com/isanypkg The attachment must have been scrubbed. Plus, gmail doesn't give me copies of mail that I send to the list. Broken, broken gmail! [2] Should also check

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning selinux and xen

2009-11-08 Thread Thomas Bächler
helios schrieb: Hi. currently I am maintaining the Xen-Dom0-kernel and the Xen-HV-tools-package in AUR and therefor it would be no problem to maintain the Xen-Package in AUR, but I am not a TU. Out of curiosity, what is your Xen dom0 based on? Is it using forward-ported Xensource or the new

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User Application

2009-12-04 Thread Thomas Bächler
Dieter Plaetinck schrieb: hey mate. cool to have you join the club. You're the first TU I actually "know" :) Yeah, same here ... except my former self. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[aur-general] rfkill package

2010-01-08 Thread Thomas Bächler
I noticed that the rfkill package is in community now (very good). However, I have been asked if it was possible to make a few improvements: 1) Add a rfkill group (or use an existing group) and allow that group to write /dev/rfkill using udev (if we add a group, we should do that in the filesystem

[aur-general] Module breakage (WAS: Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.3-1)

2010-01-09 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 08.01.2010 09:06, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: > Hi guys, > bump to latest bugfix version. > > Arch Linux bugfixes/feature requests: > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17538 # added blktrace > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17106 # finally added CONFIG_MMIOTRACE One of these changes broke aufs, a

Re: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining?

2010-02-03 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 03.02.2010 15:32, schrieb Lex Rivera: > Hi all. I wanna ask is it possible to become TU without [community] > maintaining, just as AUR moderator? I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position instead of calling it "Semi-TU". When I was a TU, I didn't care at all about

Re: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining?

2010-02-03 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 03.02.2010 16:44, schrieb Angel Velásquez: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Florian Friesdorf wrote: >> I'd give an AUR moderator all permissions to mess around in the AUR, be >> it packages of TUs or not. If somebody messes up, he/she can be punished >> later. Agreed. They should be respons

Re: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining?

2010-02-03 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 03.02.2010 20:05, schrieb Lex Rivera: > Lex/Alex/Alexander. Ah, "he" then :) > Well, before we can set moderators, we must > understand how that position will work from the code side. We can of > course just grant access to orphan & delete, if i understood correctly. IMO, just setting them a

[aur-general] Orphaning hibernate-script

2010-04-09 Thread Thomas Bächler
Its been a while since I actively maintained hibernate-script, and I don't use it anymore. I am orphaning it right now - if a dev or TU wants it, it's free for grabs. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Jan Steffens

2010-04-19 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 19.04.2010 08:27, schrieb Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227): >> Since then, I went through quite a few distributions: SuSE, Mandrake, >> Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian. Gentoo was the first distribution that got me >> interested in getting to know the internals a bit more. About a year >> ago, a fellow CS

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] unrealircd 3.2.8.1-2 contains backdoor

2010-06-12 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 13.06.2010 00:57, schrieb Alexander Duscheleit: > Hi folks, > > the unrealircd version in community (3.2.8.1-2) has been flagged as > containing a backdoor which allows an attacker to execute commands with > the privileges of the user running the daemon. > > The md5sum in the PKGBUILD (abs) ma

Re: [aur-general] Thunderbird on x64

2010-06-28 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 28.06.2010 18:35, schrieb Enrico Scichilone: > Hey list, > does anybody else has a problem with Enigmail and Thunderbird on a > x86_64 system? > > It is disabled for quite some time now, every time an update comes in, > the error shows up: > ""Enigmail" could not be installed, because it is not

[aur-general] System update on all Arch Servers

2010-07-11 Thread Thomas Bächler
Hello, I -Syu'd and rebooted all our servers, let me know if there are any problems. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Proposal to move sage-mathematics into [community].

2010-08-12 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 12.08.2010 19:34, schrieb Ronald van Haren: > Sorry it doesn't really make sense to me. Why would we want to > duplicate all these packages that we already have in the repos with > one big fat binary containing them all? > I mean, all SAGE is doing is getting sources from open source projects >

Re: [aur-general] Important: upcoming dbscripts release

2010-08-21 Thread Thomas Bächler
I am pulling new dbscripts on sigurd now. Am 16.08.2010 19:49, schrieb Pierre Schmitz: > Hi all, > > as the new dbscripts are quite done I'll send you a list with the most > important changes. (If you are in a hurry read at least the next > paragraph) > > Incompatible changes: > * db-update will

[aur-general] At last, clean multilib support

2010-08-22 Thread Thomas Bächler
Jan Steffens and me spent the this weekend putting together a multilib toolchain and a clean lib32-glibc package. I wanted to do this for at least two years, and we finally managed to do it on FrOSCon now. This is the plan of attack on this: * Maintain the PKGBUILDs in svn-community/${pkgname}/tru

Re: [aur-general] At last, clean multilib support

2010-08-22 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 22.08.2010 10:39, schrieb Thomas Bächler: > Jan Steffens and me spent the this weekend putting together a multilib > toolchain and a clean lib32-glibc package. I wanted to do this for at > least two years, and we finally managed to do it on FrOSCon now. This is > the plan of at

Re: [aur-general] At last, clean multilib support

2010-08-24 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 22.08.2010 10:39, schrieb Thomas Bächler: > Jan Steffens and me spent the this weekend putting together a multilib > toolchain and a clean lib32-glibc package. I wanted to do this for at > least two years, and we finally managed to do it on FrOSCon now. This is > the plan of at

[aur-general] Changes to AUR and community due to the multilib repository

2010-08-27 Thread Thomas Bächler
With the creation of the [multilib] repository, all 32-bit libraries are now installed in /usr/lib32 and compiled from source using the gcc-multilib package instead of being copied from i686 packages. All AUR users maintaining lib32-* and bin32-* packages are encouraged to adapt their packages to t

Re: [aur-general] Want to submit a PKGBUILD

2010-08-31 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 31.08.2010 14:48, schrieb 陈文龙: > I tried to. > But it says "The address, *qzche...@gmail.com*, is already in use." > I cannot remember my account, if I have registered. Your account is chenwl. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[aur-general] New repositories (community-staging, multilib-testing)

2010-09-11 Thread Thomas Bächler
The TU server now has a staging repository, this has been requested due to the big python rebuild. All rebuilds that are made for the staging repository should be put into community-staging now. multilib now has a testing repository, in case we need it (especially useful when testing has a new too

Re: [aur-general] github switched to SSL everywhere

2010-11-06 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 06.11.2010 08:29, schrieb Ionuț Bîru: >> $ wget http://github.com/ >> --2010-11-06 15:45:12-- http://github.com/ >> Resolving github.com... 207.97.227.239 >> Connecting to github.com|207.97.227.239|:80... connected. >> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved Permanently >> Location: h

[aur-general] libnl 2.0 rebuild

2011-01-13 Thread Thomas Bächler
So, libnl 2.0 was declared stable in October as I just learned. These packages are compatible with libnl 2.0: - crda - iw - wpa_supplicant - hostapd These packages don't as far as I can see: - libpcap - networkmanager These I didn't check: - kismet - net-snmp - knemo - libvirt - simh Can the re

Re: [aur-general] Changing AUR development infrastructure.

2011-01-17 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 17.01.2011 02:19, schrieb Loui Chang: > Recently I've had the idea that I should move the 'main' AUR git repo, > which I have been the caretaker of to the community server where all > other community and AUR development is done. This would also mean we > would have to run a git daemon, and shoul

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] Please settle 'base' in 'depends' for all

2011-01-19 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 19.01.2011 08:08, schrieb Allan McRae: > If we want to be really pedantic about dependencies, we should list > _ALL_ dependencies and not remove the ones that are dependencies of > dependencies. Why don't we just do the correct thing: If package A depends on package B, and B depends on C, then

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] Please settle 'base' in 'depends' for all

2011-01-19 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 19.01.2011 13:32, schrieb Seblu: >> If package A depends on package B, and B depends on C, then A might >> depend on C explicitly because it accesses C directly. Or it might only >> depend on indirectly C because B accesses C. We should reflect that in >> dependencies (in the first case, A depen

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] Please settle 'base' in 'depends' for all

2011-01-19 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 19.01.2011 14:07, schrieb Allan McRae: > Its has been many years since I did graph theory... but isn't a > "transitive closure" essentially what we have been doing with only > listing the top level of dependencies and having them cover the rest? It's the exact opposite. You list all dependencie

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] Please settle 'base' in 'depends' for all

2011-01-19 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 19.01.2011 14:19, schrieb Allan McRae: > On 19/01/11 23:07, Thomas Bächler wrote: >> It's the exact opposite. You list all dependencies, and dependencies of >> dependencies, and ... >> > > Ah... OK. then I don't understand this: Don't worry, me neit

Re: [aur-general] Gzipped kernel modules

2011-03-11 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 11.03.2011 00:45, schrieb Thomas S Hatch: > Wait, you are saying that insmod will load gzipped mods if compiled > differently? > No. depmod, modinfo and modprobe can do it, insmod can't. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Gzipped kernel modules

2011-03-11 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 11.03.2011 16:55, schrieb Thomas S Hatch: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > >> Am 11.03.2011 00:45, schrieb Thomas S Hatch: >>> Wait, you are saying that insmod will load gzipped mods if compiled >>> differently? >>> >>

Re: [aur-general] Gzipped kernel modules

2011-03-11 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 11.03.2011 17:41, schrieb Thomas S Hatch: >> It looks like it is much easier to teach insmod gzip. If I see this >> right, it is actually trivial, although I did not try. module-init-tools >> didn't have a git commit for 9 months, so I don't know how fast they >> would accept a patch. >> >> > Ye

[aur-general] New list: arch-projects

2011-03-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
A new list has been created: arch-projects. This list is for development discussion, patches and pull requests for initscripts, netcfg, dbscripts, devtools (and maybe other projects, those are the ones I could think of). Anyone is free to subscribe, but please, no user discussions (keep those to

[aur-general] udev rule files in /etc/udev/rules.d, usage of SYSFS

2011-05-20 Thread Thomas Bächler
I just got flooded with this message: 'SYSFS{}= will be removed in a future udev version, please use ATTR{}= to match the event device, or ATTRS{}= to match a parent device, in /etc/udev/rules.d/51-hso-udev.rules' And I remembered there are 2 things to fix. 1) Move all udev rule files provided b

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] udev rule files in /etc/udev/rules.d, usage of SYSFS

2011-05-28 Thread Thomas Bächler
HELLO??? Am 20.05.2011 10:42, schrieb Thomas Bächler: > I just got flooded with this message: > > 'SYSFS{}= will be removed in a future udev version, please use ATTR{}= > to match the event device, or ATTRS{}= to match a parent device, in > /etc/udev/rules.d/51-hso-ud

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-08-06 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 05.08.2011 23:54, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: > [1] http://projects.archlinux.org/aur.git/commit/?id=1e7b9d57 > [2] http://projects.archlinux.org/aur.git/commit/?id=5ea9fc19 > [3] http://projects.archlinux.org/aur.git/commit/?id=973e4f85 > [4] http://projects.archlinux.org/aur.git/commit/?id=897211

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-08-06 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 06.08.2011 13:13, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: > On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 01:02:03PM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: >> Am 05.08.2011 23:54, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: >>> [1] http://projects.archlinux.org/aur.git/commit/?id=1e7b9d57 >>> [2] http://projects.archlinux.org/

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-08-06 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 06.08.2011 10:52, schrieb Loui Chang: > On Sat 06 Aug 2011 13:39 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: >> Alternatively: Do not display a login form on http, instead display a >> link "If you want to login, switch to a secure connection first.". This >> way, the user v

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-08-07 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 06.08.2011 14:32, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: > For all tl;dr guys around. This is my proposal: > > * Use HTTPs links by default (this is already implemented). > > * Enable secure cookies. > > * Disallow HTTP login (or at least print a big, fat warning if a user > tries to login via HTTP). I

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-09-01 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 01.09.2011 13:01, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: archlinux.org -> http -> no login anyway bbs.archlinux.org -> https-> separate login page wiki.archlinux.org -> https-> separate login page bugs.archlinux.org -> https-> login on main page aur.archlinux

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-09-05 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 03.09.2011 17:49, schrieb Gordon JC Pearce: > The other is that switching to https has left AUR in a fundamentally broken > state. If you search for a package on AUR with any of the significant search > engines, they return an http link. You can't do anything with this, though, > because *e

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-09-05 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 05.09.2011 14:51, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:44:29PM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: >> Am 03.09.2011 17:49, schrieb Gordon JC Pearce: >>> The other is that switching to https has left AUR in a fundamentally broken >>> state. If you search fo

Re: [aur-general] FYI: New packages have to be signed

2011-11-02 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 01.11.2011 19:05, schrieb Kwpolska: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Smartboy > wrote:> Just wondering, as a user, does this mean Pacman will now > complain if one> builds and installs unsigned packages from the AUR? The default SigLevel is "Optional" for now. This should be changed to "Packa

[aur-general] Developer / TU key signing, first master key available

2011-11-19 Thread Thomas Bächler
Hello developers / TUs, My Arch master key is available at [1] with fingerprint 6841 48BB 25B4 9E98 6A49 44C5 5184 252D 824B 18E8. Every packager, please do the following: 1) Reply to this email to tho...@master-key.archlinux.org and fully quote this email. Include your gerolde/sigurd username i

Re: [aur-general] Developer/TU key signing

2011-11-25 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 25.11.2011 14:27, schrieb Ionut Biru: > Hi, > > my arch master key is available [1] with fingerprint 44D4 A033 AC14 0143 > 9273 97D4 7EFD 567D 4C7E A887. > > Every packager please do: > > 1) reply this email in the mailing list, include gerolde/sigurd username > and sign your reply using you

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Timothy Redaelli

2011-11-28 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 28.11.2011 13:30, schrieb Timothy Redaelli: > Hi, > I thought about applying as a TU for some time now, I think the > selection of packages provided by Arch is already great but there is > always space for additional quality software in community and I hope > to help with that. > > Here's a lit

Re: [aur-general] Developer / TU key signing, first master key available

2011-11-28 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 19.11.2011 15:38, schrieb Thomas Bächler: > Hello developers / TUs, > > My Arch master key is available at [1] with fingerprint 6841 48BB 25B4 > 9E98 6A49 44C5 5184 252D 824B 18E8. > > Every packager, please do the following: > 1) Reply to this email to tho...@master-

Re: [aur-general] GPG Key Signing

2011-12-01 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 01.12.2011 12:19, schrieb Xyne: > I'm in the process of getting my key signed (Pierre has signed, Thomas and > Ionut should sign soon, not sure if Dan will sign due to not knowing my real > name). Dan's way isn't just about knowing the realname. He wants to verify that the name is correct. I c

Re: [aur-general] GPG Key Signing

2011-12-01 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 01.12.2011 23:08, schrieb Gaetan Bisson: > [2011-12-01 09:08:39 -0600] Thomas Dziedzic: >> I don't think anyone has actually verified that any of the given names >> are real names. > > Well, actually, CAcert (which Dan relies on) is all about verifying > people's actual identity, in particular

Re: [aur-general] 2 recommendations needed for installing Arch Linux

2011-12-06 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 06.12.2011 12:28, schrieb Ralf Mardorf: > Hi :) > > I'm new to the list. Wrong list. You want arch-general. > Sorry that my mail is formatted in HTML. You're lucky you didn't get filtered. Apparently, we only strip the HTML from the message instead of blocking it completely. > I'll switch t

Re: [aur-general] [PATCH] Added handling of ctrl-c

2011-12-09 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 09.12.2011 11:21, schrieb Alexander Rødseth: > --- > namcap.py | 19 +++ > 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) How about actually posting to the right list? https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-projects signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digit

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Ike Devolder

2012-03-01 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 01.03.2012 08:33, schrieb Ike Devolder: > Hi, > > Currently I'm using Archlinux as my primary operating system for over 6 > years and for several years I'm maintaining a small number of packages in > AUR[1]. I also keep a repository with arch packages for everyone to use[2] > and view the pkgbu

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Ike Devolder

2012-03-02 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 01.03.2012 15:31, schrieb Peter Lewis: > On Thursday 01 Mar 2012 07:51:47 Stéphane Gaudreault wrote: >>> This is a bit picky of me, but technically the sponsor is supposed to be a >>> TU and as far as I can tell Stéphane is a dev rather than a TU... >> >> So ... Following this logic I have the p

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Ike Devolder - results

2012-03-14 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 13.03.2012 19:23, schrieb Stéphane Gaudreault: > Ike, please follow these steps [1]. > > [...] > > [1] > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/New_Trusted_User_Checklist#TODO_list_for_new_Trusted_Users This list is missing an important (new) step: The PGP key needs to be verified by at least 3

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] TU Removal -- Kaiting Chen

2012-10-18 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 18.10.2012 05:08, schrieb Kaiting Chen: > Hey guys I was actually just about to turn in my resignation. It's been > great working with all of you but unfortunately I have absolutely no time > anymore for my TU responsibilities and do not foresee any circumstance in > the near future in which I w

Re: [aur-general] AsciiDoc version of the TU bylaws

2012-10-31 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 31.10.2012 17:49, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: > Hi! > > I converted our TU bylaws to AsciiDoc and imported he converted document > into a Git repository that I temporarily hosted on [1]. Maybe we can > eventually move that to one of the Arch Linux servers. If you need a git-shell account and repo