[aur-general] Resignation from Trusted User position

the great times :) - Thomas Dziedzic (aka td123)

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] GHC 7.8.1 packaging decisions for Arch Linux

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Jeremy Audet wrote: > > Doesn't every language with its own package manager have this problem? > For example, Python. Is there a good solution? Users knowing about this > issue and making their own decisions is the current solution on every > distro I'm familiar

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] GHC 7.8.1 packaging decisions for Arch Linux

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > > Now that aside is finished, what is the deal with that arch-haskell > group? Is it still going? Would they want to provide packages > officially instead? I wouldn't actually be opposed to this idea. A lot of effort is duplicated with rega

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] GHC 7.8.1 packaging decisions for Arch Linux

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > > > I would like to keep XMonad/XMobar in [community] it does seem to take up > a big chunk of the haskell-* packages we have in our repos. But I've never > ran into real big issues packaging haskell libraries, one minor issue is > that t

Re: [aur-general] GHC 7.8.1 packaging decisions for Arch Linux

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: > > I'm guessing this means cabal-install now is the only package outside > of [community] that uses ghc to build. Is that right? > That would be correct. > Is the plan then that any future tools (i.e. non-libraries) > implemented in Haske

[aur-general] GHC 7.8.1 packaging decisions for Arch Linux

Hello all, With the arrival of ghc 7.8.1 [0], I would like to address the following problems with a restructuring of how we treat haskell packages in archlinux: Problem 1: Updating any haskell package has been delayed until we bump ghc. Explanation: ghc is unable to produce a library that has a s

Re: [aur-general] status of http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/log/linux-ck

Fixed this yesterday. On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Ionut Biru wrote: > On 11/13/2012 11:43 PM, member graysky wrote: >> Seems to be down since 10/22/2012. Just wondering if it is terminal >> or not. No response in the discussion thread. Thx for info. >> >> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtop

[aur-general] GHC 7.6.1 now in [testing]

Hey everyone! It's that time again for arch to get the latest ghc! GHC 7.6.1 comes with a bunch of new and exciting features: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/7.6.1/html/users_guide/release-7-6-1.html This morning, all the haskell packages should have been rebuilt against the latest ghc and I have

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Jonathan Steel

just voted :) hopefully you weren't waiting for me

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

done & thanks!

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for python2-sympy-066

done & thanks!

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Andrzej Giniewicz (giniu)

With 13 yes votes, 1 no vote, and 5 abstain votes, I would like to welcome Andrzej (giniu) as a new tu.

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Andrzej Giniewicz (giniu)

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Andrzej Giniewicz wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski > wrote: >> I hope we'll see you on IRC when/if you become TU. ;) > > I will try :) > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Florian Pritz wrote: >> Mind uploading your gpg key

Re: [aur-general] request of removal some needless packages of mine

On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 12:06 PM, mitsu...@gmail.com wrote: > Okay, I request again. > Three packages listed below are needless. > > - mecab-python ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40461 ) > - python2-blohg ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57358 ) > - python-hieroglyph-forked

Re: [aur-general] request of removal some needless packages of mine

Hi, can you please include a link to each of the mentioned packages? thanks

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Andrzej Giniewicz (giniu)

Oops a little late to the party but my excuse was I was sleeping :) I can confirm I'm Andrzej's sponsor. Let the discussion begin!

Re: [aur-general] sks

I posted an updated sks 1.1.3 package that builds in the comments on https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47054 I didn't test it, just made it build which is the reason why I didn't update it. (I don't use sks) cheers

Re: [aur-general] sks

On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:33 PM, David Benfell wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > I'm still relatively new to Arch, so I'm still finding my way around > and becoming familiar with the Arch Way. > welcome > I'm interested in sks. It is presently set up for versio

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Daniel Wallace (gtmanfred)

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: > Voting is now over. > The vote was successful. > > gtmanfred is now a Trusted User, congrats :) Stats of the vote: 14 Yes 7 No 4 Abstain Total: 25 votes

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Daniel Wallace (gtmanfred)

Voting is now over. The vote was successful. gtmanfred is now a Trusted User, congrats :)

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Daniel Wallace (gtmanfred)

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Daniel Wallace wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 02:05:45PM -0700, José Quintana wrote: >> Hi >> >> I ask as a user one question. Do you think you are ready? >> >> I ask this because I see you do not participate in the community much. I see >> you only joined the f

Re: [aur-general] Remove iceweasel-libre

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Kevin Vesga <31337h4c...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please delete iceweasel-libre [1] as the maintainer made a new package > iceweasel [2] > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59175 > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59185 deleted

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 4:02 AM, A Rojas wrote: > A Rojas wrote: > >> sage-mathemtics-spkgs >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56736 >> >> This was split off from sage-mathematics when it was in [community], but I >> think it makes no sense to have it in AUR, since you need to get the >>

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Daniel Wallace (gtmanfred)

I confirm that I am his sponsor. Let the discussion begin!

Re: [aur-general] Merge telepathy-qt4-git into telepathy-qt-git

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:20 AM, George Brooke wrote: > Hi, > Please merge telepathy-qt4-git [1] into telepathy-qt-git [2] which is in line > with the naming of the official telepathy-qt package. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36235 > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?I

Re: [aur-general] remove package

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Tai-Lin Chu wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57916 > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56186 > > Thanks. deleted wic and qmount

Re: [aur-general] Vote results for speps' TU application

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Thorsten Töpper wrote: > Hello, > > the vote for speps' application is over so it's time to publish the > results: > > > Yes:           20 > No:             1 > Abstain:        2 > Participants:  23 > active TUs:    27 > > So the conditions are met, congratulations

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: mingw32-fftw-static

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Schala Zeal wrote: > Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28658 > > I recently submitted mingw32-fftw, which compiles both shared and static > libraries and is also up to date. This obsoletes the static package. done

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Andrzej Giniewicz wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to ask to remove libwacom package I made few months back - it > was moved into extra few days ago and wasn't deleted from AUR. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55054 > > Cheers, > Andrzej. done

Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: > On 17 April 2012 18:19, Jakub Schmidtke wrote: >> Hi, >> >> android-docs ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48478 ) is very >> outdated (over 4 months). I sent an email to the maintainer 2 weeks ago, >> but I haven't received any

Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Jakub Schmidtke wrote: > Hi, > > android-docs ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48478 ) is very > outdated (over 4 months). I sent an email to the maintainer 2 weeks ago, > but I haven't received any response. > > Thanks! orphaned

Re: [aur-general] Deletion requests

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > The following are all orphan.  They each have additional reason(s) that > make them candidate for deletion. > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45124 > Is out of date (marked 11 months ago).  Stable version is newer than > t

Re: [aur-general] rednotebook package

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Dmitry Korzhevin wrote: > Hello, guys > > I am maintainer of rednotebook package in AUR: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21984 > > I owned and updating this package about a year, and now i wish to > maintain this package in official Community repositor

Re: [aur-general] AUR package removal request

On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Padfoot wrote: > Hi, > > I am the maintainer of the following AUR packages: > > lightdm-gtk-greeter-no-gnome: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58232 > lightdm-gtk-greeter-osk-no-gnome: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58236 > lightdm-osk: https

Re: [aur-general] Packages up for adoption in community.

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: > Hi > > I am disowning vtk, paraview (along with libcgns2 as a dep), nut, > root, and swi-prolog in community. > I will give the devs/tus a week to adopt them before I move them to the aur. > > Cheers! Also adding on

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: linux-aircrack

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Ifai Gios wrote: > The AUR package > linux-aircrackis > obsolete as of linux-3.3, as the patches it includes are now > implemented > into linux. Please delete the AUR package. > > Thank you in advance > > The maintain

[aur-general] Packages up for adoption in community.

Hi I am disowning vtk, paraview (along with libcgns2 as a dep), nut, root, and swi-prolog in community. I will give the devs/tus a week to adopt them before I move them to the aur. Cheers!

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Ike Devolder

On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Xyne wrote: > Thomas Dziedzic wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: >> > On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Ike Devolder >> > wrote: >> >> Op 03-03-12 16:41, Xyne schreef: >> >>

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Ike Devolder

On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: > On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Ike Devolder wrote: >> Op 03-03-12 16:41, Xyne schreef: >>> Ike Devolder wrote: >>> >>> /snip >>> >>>> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.ph

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Ike Devolder

On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Ike Devolder wrote: > Op 03-03-12 16:41, Xyne schreef: >> Ike Devolder wrote: >> >> /snip >> >>> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&L=2&K=BlackIkeEagle >> >> Hi Ike, >> >> I too think that your PKGBUILDs look good. They're clean and well-structured. >>

[aur-general] ghc 7.4.1 moved to extra

I have finally moved the new ghc to arch repos. With this cleanup comes a bit of change. The decision has been made that ghc will be updated to the latest stable version and haskell-platform will be moved to the aur. This means you should remove the haskell-platform related packages before updatin

Re: [aur-general] Package Deletion: perltidy

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Jarek Sedlacek wrote: > Package perltidy in aur seems to be a duplicate of perl-tidy in community. > It hasn't been updated since 2010, and in the comments on the AUR page the > maintainer acknowledges it can go. > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34248

Re: [aur-general] ruby 1.9.3_p125-1 in [extra]

On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Peter Lewis wrote: > On Saturday 25 Feb 2012 13:43:39 Thomas Dziedzic wrote: >> I have released ruby 1.9.3_p125 into [extra]. > > Great work, Thomas. > >> As a result of the above change, all ruby gem packages will have to >> add

Re: [aur-general] ruby 1.9.3_p125-1 in [extra]

On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Peter Lewis wrote: > On Saturday 25 Feb 2012 13:43:39 Thomas Dziedzic wrote: >> I have released ruby 1.9.3_p125 into [extra]. > > Great work, Thomas. > >> As a result of the above change, all ruby gem packages will have to >> add

[aur-general] ruby 1.9.3_p125-1 in [extra]

I have released ruby 1.9.3_p125 into [extra]. This is a version bump (p0 -> p125) and all tests passed for me. Along with the update, I will be introducing the following new conventions as part of my ruby cleanup project. /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby is now the correct location where non-gem ruby li

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: vte-svn

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Jekyll Wu wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > The upstream has moved to git[1], so this package[2] should be removed > now. > > [1] http://git.gnome.org/browse/vte/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20846 > -BEGIN PGP SIGN

Re: [aur-general] Rename/Remove of aur sympy git package

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Yichao Yu wrote: > The old python-sympy-git package is actually a python2 package, I have > just adopted it and uploaded a python2-sympy-git to replace the old > one. > > Please remove python3-sympy-git (which is my package uploaded before I > adopted python-...) a

Re: [aur-general] TU Resignation

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On 23/02/12 16:22, Angel Velásquez wrote: >> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi. >> >> I don't have much time right now, so I decided to resign. >> >> Sorry for the last delays and crappy things that i've been do

Re: [aur-general] disowning a couple of packages

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Peter Lewis wrote: >> On Monday 13 Feb 2012 19:03:55 Thomas Dziedzic wrote: >>> >> If you plan on adopting sage-mathematics, you should know that it is >>> >> curre

Re: [aur-general] disowning a couple of packages

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Peter Lewis wrote: > On Monday 13 Feb 2012 19:03:55 Thomas Dziedzic wrote: >> >> If you plan on adopting sage-mathematics, you should know that it is >> >> currently unbuildable on archlinux, and some other newer distros due >> &

Re: [aur-general] disowning a couple of packages

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:32 PM, A Rojas wrote: > Thomas Dziedzic wrote: > >> If you plan on adopting sage-mathematics, you should know that it is >> currently unbuildable on archlinux, and some other newer distros due >> to how it is built. >> It is currently out of

Re: [aur-general] "news" package removal

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 3:17 AM, Ольга wrote: > Name of "News RSS reader" was changed to "Tickr" by upstream. Package with > new name and updated links (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55249) > was created, but old package > (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40116) still shou

Re: [aur-general] Removal of some outdated font packages + rename of python-numpydocs

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote: > Could you please remove the following packages: > > * ttf-alexander > * ttf-alfios > * ttf-anaktoria

Re: [aur-general] [merge request] chipmunk-svn

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Andreas Krinke wrote: > Hi there, > > please merge 'chipmunk-svn' https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29628 > > into 'chipmunk-git' https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56594 > > Reason: Chipmunk moved from svn to git. > > Regards, > Andreas Krinke don

Re: [aur-general] [merge request] {rtorrent, libtorrent}-svn to {rtorrent, libtorrent}-git

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Lucky wrote: > Hello, > > please merge this packages, because developer switched to git. > > rtorrent-svn [1] to rtorrent-git [2] > and > libtorrent-svn [3] to libtorrent-git [4] > > [1] > [2]

[aur-general] disowning a couple of packages

Hi, I'm disowning sage-mathematics, sage-mathematics-spkgs(optdepends for sage-mathematics), fityk, and xylib(dependency for fityk). I will move them to the aur in a week if no TU adopts them in community. If you plan on adopting sage-mathematics, you should know that it is currently unbuildable

Re: [aur-general] Packages available to adopt in community

On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Peter Lewis wrote: > On Thursday 02 Feb 2012 12:46:21 Moritz Rudert wrote: >> I would like to the python-packages, but, like Christoph, I am not a TU >> yet and don't know how I become one? > > Is that a question or a statement? ;-) > > It's all in the TU byelaws:

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: python-potr

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Konstantin Nikiforov wrote: > Please remove my package python-potr from AUR: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51501 > > Author moved project to github and renamed it to pure-python-otr. > I've already created new package - pure-python-otr-git: > https:/

Re: [aur-general] Inactivity

2012/2/6 Bartłomiej Piotrowski : > I'll be absent to end or (20th) of February, mostly because of my > mother's death. > > If someone wants, it would be nice to upgrade Kadu (0.10.1 → 0.11.0) and > rebuild nginx and winefish against new pcre. > > I will be available by e-mail, if you need something

Re: [aur-general] Requesting adoption of two unmaintained packages

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:05 PM, iv597 wrote: > Thanks, that was quick! > > On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 10:01:21PM -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:58 PM, iv597 wrote: >> > Hello folks. The two packages I'd like to adopt are gtkradiant-svn and

Re: [aur-general] Requesting adoption of two unmaintained packages

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:58 PM, iv597 wrote: > Hello folks. The two packages I'd like to adopt are gtkradiant-svn and > gtkradiant-gamepack-urt-svn. The maintainer, thoughtcrime, has not > uploaded a new PKGBUILD for said packages since 2010, and as-are they > are broken. I sent him an email about

[aur-general] Packages available to adopt in community

Hi all, I'm trying to clean out some pkgs which I don't use anymore. I have disowned gummi, texmaker, qbittorrent, lightspark, spyder, python-rope, python2-rope (spyder optdepends), python2-pyflakes(spyder optdepends), ginac. These are available for other tus to adopt. If no one adopts them in 7 d

Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request: owx

On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Ruslan Nabioullin wrote: > Hello, > > The AUR package "owx" [1] does not build. I have attempted to contact > the maintainer in order to send a patch, but to no avail. Therefore, I > am interested in maintaining this package. > > Thanks in advance, > -Ruslan > > [1

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: dkms-rtl8192se

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Jason Melton wrote: > Please delete my package: dkms-rtl8192se[1] > > Last reason for its existence (lts kernel < 3.0) has expired. > > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47330 deleted

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: ruby-postgres

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Manu wrote: > Hi,. > > Please remove ruby-postgres [1] from AUR. It is now packaged as a gem, and > apparently the name has changed to ruby-pg. I uploaded the new PKGBUILD > here [2]. > > Cheers, > Manu > > [1]* *https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19735 > [

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] Multiple packages

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Stefan Wilkens wrote: > dug up a few more relics for the dustbin, please remove. > > name: mb-desktop-xine > AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3757 > reason: upstream 404, orphan > > name: kpiqtorial > AUR link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request: libgpod-sharp-git

2012/1/11 José Ramón García : > Please remove libgpod-sharp-git[1], its orphaned and pulls from the same > source as libgpod-git[2]. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40252 > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32393 done

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Joel Teichroeb wrote: > Could you remove these packages? They were used for older versions of > wayland and are no longer needed. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30346 wayland-dri2proto-git > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30347 wayland-eagl

Re: [aur-general] Disown request for `menhir`

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Sergei Lebedev wrote: > Thomas, > > I've emailed the maintainer and got no reply so far, should I wait any > longer? > > Sergei > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Sergei Lebedev wrote: > >> Okay, I will, thanks! >> &

Re: [aur-general] Disown request for `menhir`

On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Sergei Lebedev wrote: > Hello, > > Is it possible to disown `menhir` [*] package? It has been flagged as OOD > since October, and maintainer seems to ignore the comments completely. > > Thanks, > Sergei > > [*] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15726 have y

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request - android-2.2, android-2.3

On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Jonathan Wilson wrote: > The packages android-2.2 and android-2.3 are both maintained by Figo.zhang > and have been obsolete for many months. I emailed the dev about 6 weeks > ago, and received no response. Please orphan the packages, and I will pick > them up and

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:00 PM, rafael ff1 wrote: > lib32-nvidia-utils-71xx [1] is not updated since 2007, doesn't comply > with multilib (installs libs in /opt/lib32/usr/lib), orphan, flagged > as out-of-date since Feb 2011 and... no one seems to complain about > it. > > https://aur.archlinux.org

Re: [aur-general] wingide maintainer

On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Diogo Baeder wrote: > Hello, > > The wingide package is out-of-date, and I tried to contact the maintainer, > but with no reply. I'd like to maintain it myself, then, if there's no other > suggestion that I can use to update the package. > > This is the URL for th

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request: pylast

On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Elder Marco wrote: > Hi, > > The package pylast [1] could be removed. > This package is orphan and out-of-date. Furthermore, there are two another > packages available: python-pylast[2] and python2-pylast[3]. > > [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=265

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Axilleas P wrote: > Please delete faenza-clementine-icon [1] as it's now included in the faenza > theme package. Thanks. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52898 > > -- > (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile > (0.o ) to help him achieve world domin

[aur-general] dropping vim-nerdtree from community

for anyone interested in maintaining it in the aur, it's free to adopt I'm using vundle to manage my vim extensions so I have no need to package vim plugins anymore. Also, nerdtree 4.2.0 just came out so if someone adopts it, it will need a minor update. Cheers!

Re: [aur-general] Removal request (meliae-icons)

On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Edoardo Maria Elidoro wrote: > Hi, > the package meliae-icons (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31508) > is just a duplicated and out-of-date version of meliae-iconset ( > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48623). > > I think it should be removed.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request (gnome-shell-fainece)

On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Edoardo Maria Elidoro wrote: > Hi, > the package gnome-shell-fainece ( > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51877) is just a duplicated, > misspelled and out-of-date version of gnome-shell-faience ( > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51878). > > I

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: DroidDraw

On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Jason Melton wrote: > Please orphan droiddraw[1]. > > It is out-of-date for 2+ versions, since July of this year. I emailed the > current maintainer 2 weeks ago with no response. > > I have a current PKGBUILD ready to go. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: linux-one

On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Christopher luna wrote: > I would like to adopt the linux-one package > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51552 > > > The last update is from 14 sept, it has been marked as outdated since 9 nov, > and I have mailed the author, but got no response. > > Si

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: coffee-script

On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Gordin <9or...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I'd like to take over maintaining coffee-script [1]. > I know that you should email the maintainer first, but he clearly has > no interest in maintaining this package any more as it hasn't been > updated for 7 months and there

Re: [aur-general] delete request (firefox-moonlight64)

On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Andrzej Giniewicz wrote: > Looking trough some AUR packages I use and/or used, I found one > candidate to remove > > firefox-moonlight64 - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52979 > > it is 64 bit version of package firefox-moonlight - and now > firefox-moon

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: alephone-ttep-*

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Marcin 'armitage' Skory wrote: > Hello. > I would like to request removal of the following packages: >  - alephone-ttep-marathon (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24011) >  - alephone-ttep-marathon2 (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24009) >  - al

Re: [aur-general] Merge Request

On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:32 PM, speps wrote: > Hi, > > a merge is requested: > > [1] zope-event     -> [2] python2-zope-event > [3] zope-component -> [4] python2-zope-component > > Tnx > > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14382 > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55058

Re: [aur-general] Merge reuest: microchip-mplab_bin to microchip-mplabx-bin

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:48 PM, BxS wrote: > Dear TUs, > > Please remove microchip-mplab_bin(1) and merge to microchip-mplabx-bin(2), > the main reason is the name and version, the 'x' was represented in (1) as > v10, this worked during the beta version, but now the final version is out > and is

Re: [aur-general] removal request (fossil-fossil)

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Gour wrote: > > Hi! > > Orphaned and mostly obsolete since there is fossil package, so I believe > it can be removed: > > fossil-fossil: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44775 > > > Sincerely, > Gour > > -- > One who restrains the senses of action but who

Re: [aur-general] Timothy Redaelli (tredaeli) TU application - voting period

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Emiliano Vavassori wrote: > > Il giorno 15/dic/2011, alle ore 15:41, Andrea Scarpino ha scritto: >> That means we can welcome Timothy Redaelli as new TU team member. >> Congratulations! > > Congratulations. I'm curious on how well you will do here, after seeing yo

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: alot

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Philipp Überbacher wrote: > > Hi there, > the package 'alot' https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51503 > should be deleted since it checks out from git. > I wrote and uploaded a replacement PKGBUILD with the proper name > 'alot-git'. > > There actually is a r

Re: [aur-general] Christmas cleanup of [community]

On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Alexander Rødseth wrote: > Ok, we'll leave lxde, ibus and packages that are dependencies, make > dependencies or optional dependencies for packages in core, extra, > multilib or community, then. > Thanks for pointing this out. > > A correction for the historical fa

Re: [aur-general] Christmas cleanup of [community]

> With this freshly in mind, I hope there remains no doubt that this is > the perfect date to gather up all the orphans for a big package > cleanup. > > After the 13th of December (the 14th of December, then), we (TU's) > will move all packages that are still orphans from [community] to > unsupport

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:59 AM, rafael ff1 wrote: > lib32-allegro5 [1] is not needed anymore, as lib32-allegro was updated > from 4.x to 5.x > > Please delete lib32-allegro5. > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49527 > > Thanks expunged

Re: [aur-general] GPG Key Signing

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 01.12.2011 12:19, schrieb Xyne: >> I'm in the process of getting my key signed (Pierre has signed, Thomas and >> Ionut should sign soon, not sure if Dan will sign due to not knowing my real >> name). > > Dan's way isn't just about knowing

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Developer/TU key signing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/25/2011 02:27 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: > Hi, > > my arch master key is available [1] with fingerprint 44D4 A033 AC14 0143 > 9273 97D4 7EFD 567D 4C7E A887. > > Every packager please do: > > 1) reply this email in the mailing list, include gerolde/sig

Re: [aur-general] Developer / TU key signing, first master key available

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1 Am 19.11.2011 15:38, schrieb Thomas Bächler:> Hello developers / TUs,>> My Arch master key is available at [1] with fingerprint 6841 48BB 25B4> 9E98 6A49  44C5 5184 252D 824B 18E8.>> Every packager, please do the following:> 1) Reply to this email to tho

Re: [aur-general] Request for deletion

On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Linux Lover wrote: > Hi, > > I uploaded a package for a GIMP plugin a while ago, but apparently there's > already one under another name (it's also older). > Mine: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52060 > The other one: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.p

Re: [aur-general] please remove scala-ide from AUR

On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Kristof Jozsa wrote: > I decided to change my scala ide package to follow the eclipse package > naming guidelines, therefore it's now "eclipse-scala-ide". Please > remove the obsolete package from AUR. > > Sorry for my mistake. > > Thanks, > Kristof Jozsa > done,

Re: [aur-general] Resigning as a TU

On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Stefan Husmann wrote: > Hello, > > I want to resign as a TU. I do not have the time anymore to fulfill > my TU duties and to handle the new package signing stuff. > > By the way I suggest to remove the package scilab and maybe also the > dependencies from the repos

Re: [aur-general] TU Resignation

n salt and make it more awesome. It's been nice having you as a TU. I wish you the best of luck in your future endeavors! -Thomas Dziedzic

Re: [aur-general] Update request for supertuxkart

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: > On 20 November 2011 03:29, Laurent Carlier wrote: >> One solution should be to embed an irrlicht svn snapshot in supertuxkart >> package. > > That is for upstream to do, if they're so dependent on devel versions > of software. > > > -- > GPG/PG

Re: [aur-general] Request: Update coffee-script to 1.1.3

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Xavier Ho wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed on AUR, Coffeescript is outdated (1.1.1).  The most recent > version is 1.1.3.  Can someone update this package?  If not, can someone > tell me the details of how to package it up and upload the latest version > to the repo?

  1   2   3   4   >