On 1/21/19 8:09 PM, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote:
> Helloe everyone,
>
> It's been a week and the result are in:
>
> Yes:34
> No : 7
> Abstain: 6
> Total :47
>
> with a participation 83.93%, the vote to raise the number of TU sponsors
> to two has passed.
>
> Thanks to e
Helloe everyone,
It's been a week and the result are in:
Yes:34
No : 7
Abstain: 6
Total :47
with a participation 83.93%, the vote to raise the number of TU sponsors
to two has passed.
Thanks to everyone for voting!
-Santiago
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 12:37:38PM -0500, Santiago Torres-A
Hi,
Sorry I just realized that we're overdue on the vote for this as the
discussion period is only 5 days.
Let the votes begin!
-Santiago.
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 09:23:12PM -0500, Santiago Torres wrote:
> The current threshold of applicants has raised some concerns with the TU
> community rega
I apologize for contributing to this sturm und drang.
On 2019-01-08 12:33, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
Rules without a process to ensure they actually achieve a useful result
don't do the thing they are intended to do. I guess if people are
dissatisfied with the application process, th
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 12:33:46PM -0500, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 1/8/19 11:30 AM, Andrew Crerar wrote:
> > SNIP't
> I'll go one step further: these guidelines are a good way to ensure
> there will be no new applicants, at all. We should just be honest and
> declare in plain words
On 1/8/19 11:30 AM, Andrew Crerar wrote:
> On 1/8/19 4:31 PM, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 07:55:47AM -0200, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
>>> Em janeiro 8, 2019 0:23 Santiago Torres via aur-general escreveu:
- Have two TUs review the applicants PKBUILDs
On 1/8/19 4:31 PM, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 07:55:47AM -0200, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
>> Em janeiro 8, 2019 0:23 Santiago Torres via aur-general escreveu:
>>> - Have two TUs review the applicants PKBUILDs
>>> - Have two TUs actually decide to support
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 07:55:47AM -0200, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Em janeiro 8, 2019 0:23 Santiago Torres via aur-general escreveu:
> > - Have two TUs review the applicants PKBUILDs
> > - Have two TUs actually decide to support this canididate
>
> I'm fine with the patch, but these two lines
Em janeiro 8, 2019 0:23 Santiago Torres via aur-general escreveu:
- Have two TUs review the applicants PKBUILDs
- Have two TUs actually decide to support this canididate
I'm fine with the patch, but these two lines are ambiguous. Are the TUs that are
going to review the PKGBUILD's the same as t
The current threshold of applicants has raised some concerns with the TU
community regarding the quality of the applications submitted. In order
to improve this, increase the threshold of TU sponsors with the
following goals:
- Have two TUs review the applicants PKBUILDs
- Have two TUs actually de
10 matches
Mail list logo
