hi hugo,
sorry for causing so much trouble with your package.
i could have seen it was a dependency in the AUR webinterface.
i'll be more careful next time.
sorry again and have a good time.
georg
--
Was bedeutet dieses PGP? http://dukun.de/pgp/
http://www.towel-day.com. am 25.5.
http://katze
On 13/11, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
On 13 November 2015 at 01:10, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
For some reason AUR user WorMzy had created an empty pkgbase without
actually pushing a package
Yeah, my bad. Curiosity got the better of me after reading the thread,
so I checked out the package to see i
On 13 November 2015 at 01:10, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
>
> For some reason AUR user WorMzy had created an empty pkgbase without
> actually pushing a package
Yeah, my bad. Curiosity got the better of me after reading the thread,
so I checked out the package to see if it was still there, and what
Den 13-11-2015 kl. 00:54 skrev Simon Hanna:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:44:49PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
>> Can we have this package restored?
> AUR 4 does not actually delete the packages, they are just hidden in the web
> interface.
> You should be able to clone and push them again.
On 12/11, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015, at 20:54, Simon Hanna wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:44:49PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> Even after the following discussion on aur-requets, python2-radicale was
> deleted. There's not a full tree of broken packages, since
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015, at 20:54, Simon Hanna wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:44:49PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> > Even after the following discussion on aur-requets, python2-radicale was
> > deleted. There's not a full tree of broken packages, since this
> > dependency is missing.
>
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:44:49PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> Even after the following discussion on aur-requets, python2-radicale was
> deleted. There's not a full tree of broken packages, since this
> dependency is missing.
>
> I'm amazed at how the TU ignored the whole thread AND the
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 02:53:27PM +0100, Jens Adam wrote:
> Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:23:23 +0100
> "G. Schlisio" :
>
> > is there any log, where we ordinary users can see, what TU
> > to adress with a complaint now?
>
> Yes, quoting the aur-requests mail:
>
> > Request #4315 has been accepted by Dra
Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:23:23 +0100
"G. Schlisio" :
> is there any log, where we ordinary users can see, what TU
> to adress with a complaint now?
Yes, quoting the aur-requests mail:
> Request #4315 has been accepted by Dragonlord [1].
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Dragonlord/
And on a mo
Am 11.11.2015 um 18:44 schrieb Hugo Osvaldo Barrera:
> Even after the following discussion on aur-requets, python2-radicale was
> deleted. There's not a full tree of broken packages, since this
> dependency is missing.
>
> I'm amazed at how the TU ignored the whole thread AND the fact that
> other
Even after the following discussion on aur-requets, python2-radicale was
deleted. There's not a full tree of broken packages, since this
dependency is missing.
I'm amazed at how the TU ignored the whole thread AND the fact that
other packages explicitly depend on this one.
Can we have this packag
11 matches
Mail list logo
