Massimiliano Torromeo and/or Jonathan Steel: Just following up to your
previous posts below.
Note that for vagrant, you really should use vagrant-installers,
rather than using gems/bundler directly for it, if you're going to
create a package. Maybe the right way is to add support to
vagrant-insta
On Wed 05 Mar 2014 at 11:29, Ido Rosen wrote:
> [...]
> Note that for vagrant, you really should use vagrant-installers,
> rather than using gems/bundler directly for it, if you're going to
> create a package. Maybe the right way is to add support to
> vagrant-installers for PKGBUILDs.
> [...]
I
On Wed 05 Mar 2014 at 20:21, Jonathan Steel wrote:
> On Wed 05 Mar 2014 at 11:29, Ido Rosen wrote:
> > [...]
> > Note that for vagrant, you really should use vagrant-installers,
> > rather than using gems/bundler directly for it, if you're going to
> > create a package. Maybe the right way is to a
From: Jonathan Steel
Date:03/05/2014 3:10 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"
Subject: Re: [aur-general] Move vagrant and ceph to [community]?
On Wed 05 Mar 2014 at 20:21, Jonathan Steel wrote:
> On Wed 05 Mar 2014 at 11:29, Ido Rosen wrote:
> >
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:49 AM, danielwallace
wrote:
>
> Did anyone step up for ceph? I have been messing with that and was working
> on adding modules and states to salt. If no one has stepped up I will look
> into moving it this weekend probably.
I have some work in progress on my github:
h
+1 for vagrant, it's really useful!
-1 for ceph, I experienced data loss last time I tried it on a small
test-cluster. (Reported a bug. It's probably fixed now, but I still
don't trust it).
Jonathan, if you should be interested in feedback/comments/PKGBUILD
testing in connection with vagrant, I
On 07/03/2014 17:26, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> -1 for ceph, I experienced data loss last time I tried it on a small
> test-cluster. (Reported a bug. It's probably fixed now, but I still
> don't trust it).
>
I support adding Ceph. There are professional appliances based on Ceph.
We have a cluster
I notice that the AUR ceph package installs non-systemd initscripts,
would moving this package to community upset some of the anti-systemd
users, or would the non-systemd initscripts be kept as a part of the
package or split off to an independent AUR package?
In any case, I'd like to see ceph re-u
I wouldn't upload the AUR package, I have my own version of the package in
progress that I linked here before.
On 08/03/2014 04:36, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
> I notice that the AUR ceph package installs non-systemd initscripts,
> would moving this package to community upset some of the anti-systemd
> users, or would the non-systemd initscripts be kept as a part of the
> package or split off to an independent A
10 matches
Mail list logo
