2011/7/15 Ray Rashif :
> On 15 July 2011 16:35, Ray Rashif wrote:
>>
>> 32-bit libs-related stuff belong in /usr/lib32 on Arch64, nowhere else.
Good point. I'll will use /usr/lib/pcsx2 for 32-bit and
/usr/lib32/pcsx2 for 64-bit system, then.
>
> See file list of
> http://www.archlinux.org/packag
On 15 July 2011 16:35, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 15 July 2011 10:32, rafael ff1 wrote:
>> If the plugins are 32-bit, it's logical to put them in /usr/lib/pcsx2
>> in 32-bit system. But in 64-bit system, I'm not sure if they whether I
>> should put them in /usr/lib or /usrlib32/ (inside "pcsx2" folde
On 15 July 2011 10:32, rafael ff1 wrote:
> If the plugins are 32-bit, it's logical to put them in /usr/lib/pcsx2
> in 32-bit system. But in 64-bit system, I'm not sure if they whether I
> should put them in /usr/lib or /usrlib32/ (inside "pcsx2" folder, of
> course).
32-bit libs-related stuff bel
2011/7/14 Justin Davis :
> I think that you mean /usr/lib/pcsx2 instead of /var/lib/pcsx2. (...)
Indeed, thanks for correcting me.
>
> Using two different folders depending on the host architecture is
> overly complicated. The advantage of a "lib32" directory name is to
> separate lib32 dynamic l
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:41 PM, rafael ff1 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm the maintainer of the package pcsx2-svn[1]. PCSX2 from now on will
> install files in a different folder than /opt/pcsx2 - I'm still going
> to adapt the PKGBUILD. Plugins, as I can see in Archlinux Packaging
> Standards [2], sho
Hi all,
I'm the maintainer of the package pcsx2-svn[1]. PCSX2 from now on will
install files in a different folder than /opt/pcsx2 - I'm still going
to adapt the PKGBUILD. Plugins, as I can see in Archlinux Packaging
Standards [2], should go to /var/lib/pcsx2/PLUGINNAME.so... However,
pcsx2 is a 3
