[aur-general] package removal request

2015-08-05 Thread luke bonham
Hello, I erroneously created the following package: https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/lain could someone please delete it? Thanks.

Re: [aur-general] package removal request

2015-08-05 Thread Marcel Korpel
* luke bonham d...@archlinux.info (Wed, 5 Aug 2015 16:47:22 +0200): could someone please delete it? Please use the 'File Request' link on the page itself. Best, Marcel

Re: [aur-general] package removal request

2015-08-05 Thread luke bonham
Nice, didn't notice this feature. Thank you. On 05 Aug 15 ◦ 17:00, Marcel Korpel wrote: * luke bonham d...@archlinux.info (Wed, 5 Aug 2015 16:47:22 +0200): could someone please delete it? Please use the 'File Request' link on the page itself. Best, Marcel

Re: [aur-general] package removal request

2014-09-29 Thread Daniel Micay
On 29/09/14 04:31 AM, Antonio wrote: This: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/sdl-nobackingstore/ Should be removed because the arch package includes the nobackingstore patch. Thanks Please flag for deletion next time. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request: ureadahead

2014-06-02 Thread Felix Yan
On Sunday, June 01, 2014 20:04:59 Steven Honeyman wrote: I've been looking for a preload solution, and found this outdated/orphaned wiki article [1] which says the kernel module is no longer available (replaced by systemd), but the userspace package ureadahead is still in the AUR [2]

[aur-general] Package removal request: ureadahead

2014-06-01 Thread Steven Honeyman
I've been looking for a preload solution, and found this outdated/orphaned wiki article [1] which says the kernel module is no longer available (replaced by systemd), but the userspace package ureadahead is still in the AUR [2] (orphaned, out of date, and no comments for 2 years!) Thanks, Steven

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request: systemd-loop-swapfile-auto

2014-05-20 Thread Timofey Titovets
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/systemd-loop-swapfile-auto/ I full rewrite this package and create new combiner, (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/systemd-swap/) this is package no more needed and can be removed. I'm going to disown it and flag it out-of-date. Please remove it

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request: systemd-loop-swapfile-auto

2014-05-20 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 09:23:19 Timofey Titovets wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/systemd-loop-swapfile-auto/ I full rewrite this package and create new combiner, (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/systemd-swap/) this is package no more needed and can be removed. I'm going to disown

[aur-general] Package removal request: matio

2014-05-15 Thread TheOddBird
I created a duplicate of libmatio. Please remove it. Sorry for any inconvenience caused ... https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/matio/ another out-of-date duplicate of libmatio is libmatio-dev. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libmatio-dev/

[aur-general] package removal request: ktsuss-svn

2014-05-08 Thread Valere Monseur
Hi, Here are the info: Package name: ktsuss-svn Package url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ktsuss-svn/ Reason for deletion: development has moved to github. I have created the package ktsuss-git for that purpose. Cheers, Valère

[aur-general] Package removal request: dmenu-xft-space

2014-05-01 Thread Carlos Pita
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dmenu-xft-space/ The only point of this package was to add a patch of mine that was already integrated in the package dmenu-xft. I'm going to disown it and flag it out-of-date. Please remove it.

[aur-general] Package removal request

2014-04-23 Thread Alexander
Please delete [1] because there is a newer package, built from hg ([2]) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/texlive-csse-fcs/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/texlive-csse-fcs-hg/ -- With regards, Polovtcev Alexander

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2014-04-23 Thread Felix Yan
On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 13:54:23 Alexander wrote: Please delete [1] because there is a newer package, built from hg ([2]) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/texlive-csse-fcs/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/texlive-csse-fcs-hg/ Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan

Re: [aur-general] Package Removal Request

2014-03-22 Thread Felix Yan
On Friday, March 21, 2014 19:59:45 Charles Bos wrote: Hello, Please could the following package be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mist-icon-theme-xfce/ I created it as an easy way to add missing icons to Xfce. All it did was to add some extra icons to /usr/share/icons/Mist

[aur-general] Package Removal Request

2014-03-21 Thread Charles Bos
Hello, Please could the following package be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mist-icon-theme-xfce/ I created it as an easy way to add missing icons to Xfce. All it did was to add some extra icons to /usr/share/icons/Mist The thing is, it doesn't make sense to add the missing

[aur-general] Package removal request

2014-03-05 Thread Simon Lipp
Hello, Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python3-imaging/ Upstream (myself) abandoned the project in favor of python-pillow which is already in community. Regards, Simon Lipp

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2014-03-05 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Simon Lipp sloonz+...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python3-imaging/ Upstream (myself) abandoned the project in favor of python-pillow which is already in community. Regards, Simon Lipp Deleted, thx. --

[aur-general] Package removal request

2014-03-05 Thread Simon Lipp
Hello, Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fantasdic/ Abandoned by upstream (not me in this case ;)) ; does not run anymore since it depends upon ruby-libglade which is not included anymore in recent ruby-gnome bindings. Regards, Simon Lipp

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2014-03-05 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Removed! Thanks. -- Sincerely, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU

[aur-general] Package removal request - ds4drv

2014-01-13 Thread Vash63
I accidentally uploaded a package with the incorrect pkgname - it was labeled ds4drv when it should have been ds4drv-git. I have already uploaded it again after correcting my error, is it possible to get the other one removed to prevent confusion?

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request - ds4drv

2014-01-13 Thread Felix Yan
On Monday, January 13, 2014 09:58:04 Vash63 wrote: I accidentally uploaded a package with the incorrect pkgname - it was labeled ds4drv when it should have been ds4drv-git. I have already uploaded it again after correcting my error, is it possible to get the other one removed to prevent

[aur-general] Package removal request - lua51-socket-prosody

2014-01-13 Thread Timothée Ravier
Hi, Please remove the following orphan package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua51-socket-prosody This is an old version not required anymore, and a newer version is in community: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/lua51-socket/ -- Timothée Ravier

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request - lua51-socket-prosody

2014-01-13 Thread Felix Yan
On Monday, January 13, 2014 20:02:29 Timothée Ravier wrote: Hi, Please remove the following orphan package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua51-socket-prosody This is an old version not required anymore, and a newer version is in community:

[aur-general] Package removal request

2013-12-23 Thread Karol Blazewicz
Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/geany-sf-git/ - it's the same as https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/geany-git/

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2013-12-23 Thread Felix Yan
On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 02:46:51 Karol Blazewicz wrote: Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/geany-sf-git/ - it's the same as https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/geany-git/ Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] Package Removal Request - stellarforces

2013-09-29 Thread Mike Lenzen
*Package Name*: stellarforces *URL:* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stellarforces/ *Reason for Deletion:* The PC version of the game has been made obsolete by the developers. The game can now only be played using their servers and an android device. *Supporting Details:* Message indicating

Re: [aur-general] Package Removal Request - stellarforces

2013-09-29 Thread Felix Yan
On Sunday, September 29, 2013 22:17:43 Mike Lenzen wrote: *Package Name*: stellarforces *URL:* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stellarforces/ *Reason for Deletion:* The PC version of the game has been made obsolete by the developers. The game can now only be played using their servers

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2013-08-15 Thread Ike Devolder
Op dinsdag 13 augustus 2013 16:12:04 schreef Karol Blazewicz: Dear TUs, when adding a package to the repos, please check if there's one in the AUR with the same name. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/caps/ https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/caps/ Please remove caps

[aur-general] Package removal request

2013-08-13 Thread Karol Blazewicz
Dear TUs, when adding a package to the repos, please check if there's one in the AUR with the same name. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/caps/ https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/caps/ Please remove caps from the AUR.

Re: [aur-general] package removal request

2013-07-19 Thread Maxime GAUDUIN
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Alexej Magura lspci...@gmail.com wrote: Could yall please remove get-pid, I'm no longer actively developing it--and it really isn't required anyway since `pidof' works just fine.

[aur-general] package removal request

2013-07-18 Thread Alexej Magura
Could yall please remove get-pid, I'm no longer actively developing it--and it really isn't required anyway since `pidof' works just fine. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/getpid/ Thank you -- Alexej Magura Give a little more for a little less today. :)

[aur-general] Package removal request

2013-06-27 Thread Francisco Pina Martins
I own a package in AUR called hardware-monitor (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hardware-monitor/). It no longer serves any purpose I know of since panel applets have been deprecated, the package no longer builds (due to a new version of automake) and upstream seems to have dropped it.

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2013-06-27 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky
On 27 June 2013 10:36, Francisco Pina Martins f.pinamart...@gmail.com wrote: I own a package in AUR called hardware-monitor (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hardware-monitor/). It no longer serves any purpose I know of since panel applets have been deprecated, the package no longer builds

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request: vim-powerline

2013-06-24 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 2013-06-20 21:36, Jonas Heinrich wrote: Hi, please remove this package since the project is discontinued: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-powerline/ Best regards, onny It is not, repository just changed name. As I'm too late for the party, can you at least elucidate us why do

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request: vim-powerline

2013-06-24 Thread Felix Yan
On Monday, June 24, 2013 08:13:26 Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: On 2013-06-20 21:36, Jonas Heinrich wrote: Hi, please remove this package since the project is discontinued: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-powerline/ Best regards, onny It is not, repository just changed

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request: vim-powerline

2013-06-24 Thread Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski b...@bpiotrowski.pl wrote: It is not, repository just changed name. As I'm too late for the party, can you at least elucidate us why do you think that vim-powerline isn't the same what powerline is? The new powerline is using Python

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request: vim-powerline

2013-06-23 Thread Felix Yan
On Thursday, June 20, 2013 19:36:49 Jonas Heinrich wrote: Hi, please remove this package since the project is discontinued: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-powerline/ Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] Package removal request: vim-powerline

2013-06-20 Thread Jonas Heinrich
Hi, please remove this package since the project is discontinued: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-powerline/ Best regards, onny pgpAMO22k5BI4.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2013-06-04 Thread Felix Yan
On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 06:32:08 archer...@gmx.com wrote: Please remove this package 'otf-ubuntu-mono-powerline-git'. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/otf-ubuntu-mono-powerline-git/ I've uploaded a new PKGBUIL 'ttf-ubuntu-mono-powerline-git

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2013-06-04 Thread Kyle
If you are running the gnome-shell version, the notification panel is now a pop-up panel called message tray. You can get to it using the alt-control tab list, but the easiest way to open it is by pressing super-m. If running sonar-13.04.1 which uses the GNOME classic interface, the notifications

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2013-06-04 Thread Kyle
Please disregard my previous message. Somehow it got sent to the wrong list, and was also in response to the wrong message. ~Kyle http://kyle.tk/ -- Kyle? ... She calls her cake, Kyle? Out of This World, season 2 episode 21 - The Amazing Evie

[aur-general] Package removal request

2013-06-03 Thread archer777
Please remove this package 'otf-ubuntu-mono-powerline-git'. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/otf-ubuntu-mono-powerline-git/ I've uploaded a new PKGBUIL 'ttf-ubuntu-mono-powerline-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-ubuntu-mono-powerline-git/ '

Re: [aur-general] package removal request

2013-05-03 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 3 May 2013 04:17, Alexej Magura lspci...@gmail.com wrote: If yall could be so kind as to remove the following packages, I'd be much obliged. I. Show https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/show II. xlisp_ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xlisp_/ Both removed, thanks.

[aur-general] package removal request

2013-05-02 Thread Alexej Magura
If yall could be so kind as to remove the following packages, I'd be much obliged. I. Show https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/show I don't have the time or the desire to develop any further, currently, and I can't see that changing in any amount of time. II. xlisp_

[aur-general] Package removal request

2013-02-11 Thread sxe
I'm the maintainer of the flowing AUR packages. The software was merged into an other software so the packages are obsolete, please remove them. 1. bedropped 2. befaded 3. begeneric Thanks in advance, Andy

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2013-02-11 Thread Felix Yan
On 02/11/2013 07:06 PM, sxe wrote: I'm the maintainer of the flowing AUR packages. The software was merged into an other software so the packages are obsolete, please remove them. 1. bedropped 2. befaded 3. begeneric Thanks in advance, Andy All removed. Please include links to

[aur-general] Package removal request: dvorak-es

2013-02-04 Thread Gerardo Marset
I'd like to have this package (which I maintain) removed from the AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dvorak-es/ It's only dependency, kbd, has been updated to include it's functionality by default, so it's now completely useless. Also this one, which looks like a duplicate:

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request: dvorak-es

2013-02-04 Thread Felix Yan
On 02/05/2013 12:11 PM, Gerardo Marset wrote: I'd like to have this package (which I maintain) removed from the AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dvorak-es/ It's only dependency, kbd, has been updated to include it's functionality by default, so it's now completely useless. Also this

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2012-12-22 Thread Felix Yan
On Saturday, December 22, 2012 01:10:54 PM Limao Luo wrote: On 12/21/2012 07:06 AM, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote: On 20 December 2012 13:06, Axilleas Pi axill...@archlinux.info wrote: Please remove python-sendfile [0], it has no home page, no license info. The information in PKGBUILD is taken from

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2012-12-21 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky
On 20 December 2012 13:06, Axilleas Pi axill...@archlinux.info wrote: Please remove python-sendfile [0], it has no home page, no license info. The information in PKGBUILD is taken from another similar package [1] which I just uploaded [2]. Thanks. [0]

[aur-general] Package removal request

2012-12-20 Thread Axilleas Pi
Please remove python-sendfile [0], it has no home page, no license info. The information in PKGBUILD is taken from another similar package [1] which I just uploaded [2]. Thanks. [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-sendfile/ [1] http://code.google.com/p/pysendfile/ [2]

[aur-general] [Package Removal Request] reviewboard-django-pipeline

2012-12-17 Thread Artyom Olshevskiy
Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/reviewboard-django-pipeline. It was a temp package to satisfy reviewboard dependency. Not needed now since I owned the original django-pipeline package. Thanks in advance.

Re: [aur-general] [Package Removal Request] reviewboard-django-pipeline

2012-12-17 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Artyom Olshevskiy siasiam...@gmail.com wrote: Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/reviewboard-django-pipeline. It was a temp package to satisfy reviewboard dependency. Not needed now since I owned the original django-pipeline package. Thanks in

Re: [aur-general] [Package Removal Request]

2012-12-01 Thread Ike Devolder
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 03:11:50PM +, Diogo Bento wrote: Greetings, I'd like to ask for the removal of the following AUR packages: lxinput-gtk3: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxinput-gtk3/lxtask-gtk3: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxtask-gtk3/lxterminal-gtk3:

[aur-general] [Package Removal Request]

2012-11-29 Thread Diogo Bento
Greetings, I'd like to ask for the removal of the following AUR packages: lxinput-gtk3: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxinput-gtk3/lxtask-gtk3: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxtask-gtk3/lxterminal-gtk3: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxterminal-gtk3/ Thank you for your

Re: [aur-general] [Package Removal Request]

2012-11-20 Thread Felix Yan
On 11/20/2012 09:52 PM, Diogo Bento wrote: Greetings, I'd like to ask for the removal of the following AUR packages: kmod-xz: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kmod-xz/ Cheers,Diogo B. (3V0LU710N) Removed, thanks. -- Felix Yan Twitter:

[aur-general] Package removal request

2012-09-19 Thread Felix Yan
Hi, I found the package openvpn-dev already provides all functionality that my package openvpn-ipv6 [1] provides, so there is no aim to provide an old beta package. Please help me remove it [1], thanks! [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60170 Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki:

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2012-09-19 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 09/19/2012 10:53 AM, Felix Yan wrote: Hi, I found the package openvpn-dev already provides all functionality that my package openvpn-ipv6 [1] provides, so there is no aim to provide an old beta package. Please help me remove it [1], thanks! [1]

[aur-general] Package removal request

2012-09-14 Thread Faruk Diblen
Hello, I made some modifications and renamed the package I maintain. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62784 Could you please remove the old package from the repository? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56066 Thank you, -- *Faruk*

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2012-09-14 Thread Jonathan Steel
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:58:48AM +0200, Faruk Diblen wrote: Hello, I made some modifications and renamed the package I maintain. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62784 Could you please remove the old package from the repository? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56066

[aur-general] Package removal request

2012-08-27 Thread Felix Yan
systemd-goagent-units [1] has been merged into goagent [2] a month ago and not needed by any package now. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56743 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59593 Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2012-08-27 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com wrote: systemd-goagent-units [1] has been merged into goagent [2] a month ago and not needed by any package now. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56743 Removed, thanks.

[aur-general] Package removal request: x264-jeeb-git

2012-08-22 Thread Felix Yan
Hi, I'd like to ask for removal, this package was my orphaned package by the end of last year and renamed to x264-jeeb after then, as upstream only releases patches in major versions and often breaks -git building. Thanks! Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request: x264-jeeb-git

2012-08-22 Thread Ike Devolder
Op woensdag 22 augustus 2012 22:38:12 schreef Felix Yan: Hi, I'd like to ask for removal, this package was my orphaned package by the end of last year and renamed to x264-jeeb after then, as upstream only releases patches in major versions and often breaks -git building. Thanks! Felix

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2012-08-22 Thread Nuno Araujo
On 19. 08. 12 00:59, Evangelos Foutras wrote: On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Nuno Araujo nuno.ara...@russo79.com wrote: Hello Me again, sorry... Could you remove the following packages? gnome15-gnome-plugins (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47363) gnome15-panel-applet

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2012-08-22 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Nuno Araujo nuno.ara...@russo79.com wrote: It seems that the gnome15-systemtray (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47361) package was not removed. Could you please remove it? Um, sorry about that; removed.

[aur-general] Package removal request: gcc42-bin

2012-08-20 Thread Martin Peres
Hi, I am the maintainer of the gcc42-bin package. Since it doesn't work anymore and I am not willing to fix it, could you remove it please? I will keep on maintaining the source package gcc42 which is cleaner than the bin package. Thanks in advance, Martin Peres

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request: gcc42-bin

2012-08-20 Thread Martin Peres
Le 20/08/2012 13:08, Martin Peres a écrit : Hi, I am the maintainer of the gcc42-bin package. Since it doesn't work anymore and I am not willing to fix it, could you remove it please? I will keep on maintaining the source package gcc42 which is cleaner than the bin package. Thanks in

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request: gcc42-bin

2012-08-20 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky
On 20 August 2012 13:10, Martin Peres martin.pe...@free.fr wrote: Le 20/08/2012 13:08, Martin Peres a écrit : Hi, I am the maintainer of the gcc42-bin package. Since it doesn't work anymore and I am not willing to fix it, could you remove it please? I will keep on maintaining the source

[aur-general] Package removal request

2012-08-18 Thread Nuno Araujo
Hi Could you remove the following packages: roccat (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41347) kone (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41349) koneplus (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44946) pyra (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41348) All those packages were

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2012-08-18 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Nuno Araujo nuno.ara...@russo79.com wrote: Hi Could you remove the following packages: roccat (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41347) kone (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41349) koneplus (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44946)

[aur-general] Package removal request

2012-08-18 Thread Nuno Araujo
Hello Me again, sorry... Could you remove the following packages? gnome15-gnome-plugins (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47363) gnome15-panel-applet (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47362) gnome15-systemtray (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47361) Those packages

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2012-08-18 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Nuno Araujo nuno.ara...@russo79.com wrote: Hello Me again, sorry... Could you remove the following packages? gnome15-gnome-plugins (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47363) gnome15-panel-applet (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47362)

[aur-general] Package removal request

2012-07-25 Thread Diogo Bento
Good night, I'd like to request the removal of the following AUR packages: deadbeef-gtk3, as current deadbeef from [community] is built with gtk3 support too: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59438dbus-core-beta and dbus-beta, as I maintained that version until dbus 1.6.0 (to deal with

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2012-07-25 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:05 AM, Diogo Bento db_...@hotmail.com wrote: Good night, I'd like to request the removal of the following AUR packages: deadbeef-gtk3, as current deadbeef from [community] is built with gtk3 support too: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59438dbus-core-beta

[aur-general] Package Removal Request

2012-07-15 Thread Jonathan Fine
Can you remove the package kdeplasma-addons-applet-blakjak? It has been renamed to follow the package naming guidelines. Thanks, Jonathan https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39691

Re: [aur-general] Package Removal Request

2012-07-15 Thread Ike Devolder
Op zondag 15 juli 2012 11:55:38 schreef Jonathan Fine: Can you remove the package kdeplasma-addons-applet-blakjak? It has been renamed to follow the package naming guidelines. Thanks, Jonathan https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39691 merged into the new package. maybe next time

[aur-general] Package removal request

2012-07-06 Thread Ondrej Kipila
Please remove package cmus-lyrics https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57528 and move it's votes to package lyvi-git, if possible. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60572 Thanks -- OK100

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2012-07-06 Thread Ike Devolder
Op vrijdag 6 juli 2012 10:48:54 schreef Ondrej Kipila: Please remove package cmus-lyrics https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57528 and move it's votes to package lyvi-git, if possible. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60572 Thanks -- OK100 merged, thx --Ike

[aur-general] Package removal request

2012-06-10 Thread Jagmjp Janpgm
Could you please remove the following packages as they don't exist or are not needed anymore: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55681 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55682 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59011

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2012-06-10 Thread speps
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:43:50 +0100 (BST) Jagmjp Janpgm darkelfdarkelf...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Could you please remove the following packages as they don't exist or are not needed anymore: Please next time include package names. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55681 was

Re: [aur-general] Package Removal Request [pygtk-shutdown-svn]

2012-06-09 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
On 9 June 2012 03:03, Austin Beatty doorkno...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, this one's a dummy package for the same thing, remove this too please. shutdown-dialog: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21001 On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Austin Beatty doorkno...@gmail.com wrote:

[aur-general] Package Removal Request [pygtk-shutdown-svn]

2012-06-08 Thread Austin Beatty
pygtk-shutdown-svn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49761 This package has been switched to git for nearly a year now and I left the -svn package as a dummy transitional package, but it's been plenty of time now, and it should be deleted now. Thanks :)

Re: [aur-general] Package Removal Request [pygtk-shutdown-svn]

2012-06-08 Thread Austin Beatty
Oh, this one's a dummy package for the same thing, remove this too please. shutdown-dialog: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21001 On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Austin Beatty doorkno...@gmail.com wrote: pygtk-shutdown-svn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49761 This package

[aur-general] [Package Removal Request]

2012-06-07 Thread Diogo Bento
Greetings, I'd like to ask for removal the following AUR package, as it's currently on [core]: libusbx - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59473 Cheers,DIogo B.

Re: [aur-general] [Package Removal Request]

2012-06-07 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Diogo Bento db_...@hotmail.com wrote: Greetings, I'd like to ask for removal the following AUR package, as it's currently on [core]: libusbx - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59473 Removed, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2012-03-14 Thread Florian Pritz
On 13.03.2012 21:34, 小龙 陈 wrote: You pressed the reply button when viewing Thorsten's mail instead of creating a new mail. That creates a References header and clients will group those mails. I'm sorry, I won't do that again. Should I resend my email?

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2012-03-14 Thread 小龙 陈
Thank you very much! Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:22:28 +0100 From: bluew...@xinu.at To: aur-general@archlinux.org Subject: Re: [aur-general] Package removal request On 13.03.2012 21:34, 小龙 陈 wrote: You pressed the reply button when viewing Thorsten's mail instead of creating a new

[aur-general] Package removal request

2012-03-13 Thread 小龙 陈
Hi TU's! Would someone mind removing the following packages? Theyare all maintained by me. Packages:  [1] xorg-xinput-ubuntu  [2] xorg-server-ubuntu  [3] xf86-video-nouveau-ubuntu  [4] xf86-video-intel-ubuntu  [5] xf86-video-ati-ubuntu  [6] xf86-input-synaptics-ubuntu  [7]

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2012-03-13 Thread 小龙 陈
Does anyone else see a formatting problem in my email?Sorry about that :( #62; From#58; chillermillerlong#64;hotmail.com#13;#10;#62; To#58; aur-general#64;archlinux.org#13;#10;#62; Date#58; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16#58;22#58;00 -0400#13;#10;#62; Subject#58;

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2012-03-13 Thread Florian Pritz
On 13.03.2012 21:22, 小龙 陈 wrote: Hi TU's! Would someone mind removing the following packages? Theyare all maintained by me. Packages: [1] xorg-xinput-ubuntu [2] xorg-server-ubuntu [3] xf86-video-nouveau-ubuntu [4] xf86-video-intel-ubuntu [5] xf86-video-ati-ubuntu [6]

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2012-03-13 Thread 小龙 陈
I'm sorry, I did press enter. I'm not sure why it doesn't show up like that. Here's how the email was supposed to look like: http://paste.kde.org/439376/ And I'm not sure how I hijacked a thread? I just sent an email to aur-general @ archlinux.org asking for some packages to removed.

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2012-03-13 Thread Florian Pritz
On 13.03.2012 21:29, 小龙 陈 wrote: I'm sorry, I did press enter. I'm not sure why it doesn't show up like that. Here's how the email was supposed to look like: http://paste.kde.org/439376/ And I'm not sure how I hijacked a thread? I just sent an email to aur-general @ archlinux.org asking

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2012-03-13 Thread 小龙 陈
You pressed the reply button when viewing Thorsten's mail instead of creating a new mail. That creates a References header and clients will group those mails. I'm sorry, I won't do that again. Should I resend my email?

[aur-general] Package removal request: python2-decorator

2012-03-13 Thread Maxime Gauduin
Hi, Could you please delete python2-decorator from AUR. I uploaded a PKGBUILD while trying to fix firewalld and didn't check the official repo before. Turns out it was already in there. BTW, there's also a python3-decorator in AUR, which would be a duplicate of python-decorator in the official

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request: python2-decorator

2012-03-13 Thread Laurent Carlier
Hi, Could you please delete python2-decorator from AUR. I uploaded a PKGBUILD while trying to fix firewalld and didn't check the official repo before. Turns out it was already in there. BTW, there's also a python3-decorator in AUR, which would be a duplicate of python-decorator in the

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request: python2-decorator

2012-03-13 Thread Maxime Gauduin
Oh I'm sorry, I will next time. Thanks for being so quick! On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Laurent Carlier lordhea...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Could you please delete python2-decorator from AUR. I uploaded a PKGBUILD while trying to fix firewalld and didn't check the official repo before.

[aur-general] Package removal request

2012-02-15 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
Hi, Please remove the following packages of mine: thailatex-svn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28852 ttf-thai-latex: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54664 ttf-thai-latex have been replaced by ttf-latex-tlwg and I no longer planned to maintain thailatex-svn. Thank you,

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2012-02-15 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi, Removed. Thanks. -- Best regards,  Alexander Rødseth  Arch Linux Trusted User  (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2012-02-15 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
On 02/15/2012 10:24 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote: Hi, Removed. Thanks. Wow, that was fast! Thanks. :) Smith

  1   2   3   >