On 09/01/2010 07:36 PM, PyroPeter wrote:
I now managed to find the developers eMail-address and take a
look on the code. what exactly is buggy about izulu?
(Apart from beeing provided as deb-packet only)
About your PKGBUILD:
1. Maintainer-comment missing
2. Not all depends listed:
The deb
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 5:31 AM, PyroPeter abi1...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 09/01/2010 07:36 PM, PyroPeter wrote:
I now managed to find the developers eMail-address and take a
look on the code. what exactly is buggy about izulu?
(Apart from beeing provided as deb-packet only)
About your
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Nathan O ndowens@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 5:31 AM, PyroPeter abi1...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 09/01/2010 07:36 PM, PyroPeter wrote:
I now managed to find the developers eMail-address and take a
look on the code. what exactly is buggy
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Gary Wright wrigg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Nathan O ndowens@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 5:31 AM, PyroPeter abi1...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On 09/01/2010 07:36 PM, PyroPeter wrote:
I now managed to find the
Maybe PyroPeter sent the developer an email requesting the tarballs get
posted to the SF page?
Yep.
--
freenode/pyropeter 12:50 - Ich drücke Return.
On 09/01/2010 10:50 PM, Nathan O wrote:
Ok I have updated it to add Maintainer. It gives that it can not find
gconftool. We have gconftool-2 but not gconftool, in which it is looking
for. When you try to run izulu
Hi,
it seems like your message got truncated.
Gconftool is not needed by izulu,
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:36 PM, PyroPeter abi1...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 09/01/2010 06:35 PM, PyroPeter wrote:
On 09/01/2010 03:02 AM, Nathan O wrote:
Ok the current packages that gives me the problems, are:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11337
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue 31 Aug 2010 00:48 -0500, Nathan O wrote:
What should I do about software that won't work, not due to the fact
about
how it is packaged, but badly coded? I am finding some packages of mine
that
won't compile or
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 01:17 -0500, Nathan O wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue 31 Aug 2010 00:48 -0500, Nathan O wrote:
What should I do about software that won't work, not due to the fact
about
how it is packaged, but badly coded? I
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:17 AM, Nathan O ndowens@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue 31 Aug 2010 00:48 -0500, Nathan O wrote:
What should I do about software that won't work, not due to the fact
about
how it is packaged, but
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:36 AM, PyroPeter abi1...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 08/31/2010 08:17 AM, Nathan O wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Loui Changlouipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue 31 Aug 2010 00:48 -0500, Nathan O wrote:
What should I do about software that won't work, not due
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Nathan O ndowens@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:36 AM, PyroPeter abi1...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 08/31/2010 08:17 AM, Nathan O wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Loui Changlouipc@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue 31 Aug 2010 00:48
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Nathan O ndowens@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Nathan O ndowens@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:36 AM, PyroPeter abi1...@googlemail.comwrote:
On 08/31/2010 08:17 AM, Nathan O wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:13 AM,
On Tue 31 Aug 2010 20:09 -0500, Nathan O wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Nathan O ndowens@gmail.com wrote:
Ok the current packages that gives me the problems, are:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11337
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10611
What should I do about software that won't work, not due to the fact about
how it is packaged, but badly coded? I am finding some packages of mine that
won't compile or run and the author(programmer) doesn't seem to be active
anymore
15 matches
Mail list logo
