On 07/27/2013 06:31 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
Discussion period has ended. Start the voting:
https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=69
Le voting period has ended. Dicebot-san is now officially Dicebot-sama!
Let's perform our ritual new-TU-group-hug. Congratulations!
Thanks!
Guess this answers
On 07/27/2013 10:09 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On 07/27/2013 06:31 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
Discussion period has ended. Start the voting:
https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=69
Le voting period has ended. Dicebot-san is now officially Dicebot-sama!
Let's perform our ritual new-TU-group-hug.
Le samedi 27 juillet 2013 19:09:21 Dicebot a écrit :
On 07/27/2013 06:31 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
Discussion period has ended. Start the voting:
https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=69
Le voting period has ended. Dicebot-san is now officially Dicebot-sama!
Let's perform our ritual
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Laurent Carlier lordhea...@gmail.com wrote:
Le samedi 27 juillet 2013 19:09:21 Dicebot a écrit :
On 07/27/2013 06:31 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
Discussion period has ended. Start the voting:
https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=69
Le voting period has
On 2013-07-27 18:31, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On 20.07.2013 15:48, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On 15.07.2013 22:31, Dicebot wrote:
[sponsor : Sven-Hendrik Haase]
[AUR account : https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Dicebot]
[IRC : Dicebot @ irc.freenode.net]
Hello,
Long story short
On 2013-07-27 18:31 +0200
Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
Discussion period has ended. Start the voting:
https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=69
Le voting period has ended. Dicebot-san is now officially Dicebot-sama!
Let's perform our ritual new-TU-group-hug. Congratulations!
I'm sorry to have to point
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/27/2013 07:53 PM, Xyne wrote:
I voted yes, so I do want this to pass, but if we just ignore the
bylaws whenever it's convenient then there's not much point to
having bylaws. We could hold a vote to make an exception in this
instance, but I'm
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
On 2013-07-27 18:31 +0200
Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
Discussion period has ended. Start the voting:
https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=69
Le voting period has ended. Dicebot-san is now officially Dicebot-sama!
Let's perform our
On 28 July 2013 01:53, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
I'm sorry to have to point this out, but the proposal has not been accepted
according to our bylaws.
Xyne, thank you for actively verifying the result of the vote. You
remind me of Loui, who used to be very particular about these things.
We
On 2013-07-27 20:49, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
according to this list, we have 36 active TUs.
Actually I see 35 TUs there, 33 without Daenyth and xyproto.
It seems like a good opportunity to determine what does active TU mean
– some Trusted Users, even if active in packaging terms, simply ignore
On 28 July 2013 02:49, Rashif Ray Rahman sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
We simply cannot ignore the bylaws. This serves as a reminder to show
us all the numbers when declaring results.
And I failed to provide that myself:
24/36 = 0.66 ... = ~0.67 0.66
according to this list, we have 36 active
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 17:53:52 +
From: x...@archlinux.ca
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: Re: [aur-general] TU application
...
I thought that was a low number of votes given the recent influx of TUs, so I
checked the total number of TUs
Hi,
Feel free to update my packages, I'll be swimming in the ocean!
---
Alexander / xyproto / TU
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv wrote:
It is nothing of real importance but question is, what harm does
explicit versioning do?
Correct me if I overlooked it, but from what I have read here, but I
have yet to see an argument that applies to the specific case here.
On 07/22/2013 01:56 PM, Martti Kühne wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv wrote:
It is nothing of real importance but question is, what harm does
explicit versioning do?
Correct me if I overlooked it, but from what I have read here, but I
have yet to see an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/20/2013 12:26 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
Almost all packages may have versioned dependencies, and we don't
do that. It's not because we don't know the minimum required
version. As we are a rolling release, we know that the system must
be
On 15.07.2013 22:31, Dicebot wrote:
[sponsor : Sven-Hendrik Haase]
[AUR account : https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Dicebot]
[IRC : Dicebot @ irc.freenode.net]
Hello,
Long story short - I am insterested in becoming a Trusted User and
taking care of packages related to D
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv wrote:
It is nothing of real importance but question is, what harm does
explicit versioning do?
Interesting question because it underlines some benefits of being a
rolling release for their maintainers.
1) Productivity
You don't need
On 20/07/13 09:53 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv wrote:
It is nothing of real importance but question is, what harm does
explicit versioning do?
Interesting question because it underlines some benefits of being a
rolling release for
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Connor Behan connor.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20/07/13 09:53 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
4) Speed
It avoid pacman to checks version for each deps. This save a lot of
useless computing (parsing and comparing two version)[1].
Even if it's not a big deal on
On 20/07/13 12:40 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Connor Behan connor.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 20/07/13 09:53 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
4) Speed
It avoid pacman to checks version for each deps. This save a lot of
useless computing (parsing and comparing two
On 20 July 2013 21:21, Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv wrote:
It is nothing of real importance but question is, what harm does
explicit versioning do?
It has no direct or immediate harmful consequence, but it is a
packaging convention here. Most of our uses for versioning
dependencies come during
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv wrote:
On 07/17/2013 11:52 PM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
Hey, Arch Wiki did not mention any questionnaire that needs to be answered!
;)
Yes and we don't speak of the rectal exam too. Not to discourage applicants. :)
Well, my name is
On 2013-07-17 23:52, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
- It's bertter to use install instead of mkdir and cp ;
We're skating on thin ice…
--
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
http://bpiotrowski.pl/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 07/17/2013 08:02 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
It's nice to see someone apply who is willing to maitain the D
toolchain. But are you willing to maintain non-related D packages in
[community] which are currently orphan or is there a certain category of
packages you like to maintain?
I have no
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv wrote:
Long story short - I am insterested in becoming a Trusted User and
taking care of packages related to D programming language.
Nice to see someone apply since the last fail.
I have been using Arch Linux for last ~5 years but
On 15.07.2013 22:31, Dicebot wrote:
[sponsor : Sven-Hendrik Haase]
[AUR account : https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Dicebot]
[IRC : Dicebot @ irc.freenode.net]
Hello,
Long story short - I am insterested in becoming a Trusted User and
taking care of packages related to D
On 15.07.2013 22:31, Dicebot wrote:
I have been using Arch Linux for last ~5 years but that does not really
matter as I have never spent any considerable time maintaining packages.
What does matter though is that I am quite active member of D community
and familiar with minor details about its
Hi,
I'll be away until July 12.
Feel free to fix or update my packages.
--
City-busz
Trused User
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/23/2013 10:23 PM, Don deJuan wrote:
From a non TU's perspective D.R. was the only one who could
publicly state why greysky should not be a TU, and the rest of the
sheeple just followed the old and grumpy man, at least that is
public
Don deJuan wrote:
There were objections! You consider them not sufficient to leads to this
result.
Everything that needed to be said has been said. After the voters have
made up their minds.
Objections were raised and then countered with arguments. If anyone felt that
the objections were
On 24 March 2013 04:42, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
If a TU has an objection that he cannot support publicly then something is
very
wrong. The application process should not be some mysterious black box of
negative, baseless opinions. If a TU would rather keep an objection to himself
than
I unsubscribed from the ML so I'm not 100 % sure that this message
will nest itself under Xyne's reply[1]. I would appear to be a
polarizing force based on the votes; I wouldn't be comfortable joining
the TU group given the more or less 50/50 split reflected in the data.
To my supporters, I'd
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Don deJuan wrote:
There were objections! You consider them not sufficient to leads to this
result.
Everything that needed to be said has been said. After the voters have
made up their minds.
Objections were raised and then
Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
Objections were raised and then countered with arguments. If anyone felt that
the objections were still valid after that then they should have replied with
their reasons. That is the point of the discussion period: to discuss the
issues and reconsider them in the
On 25 March 2013 03:30, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
Objections were raised and then countered with arguments. If anyone felt
that
the objections were still valid after that then they should have replied
with
their reasons. That is the point of the discussion
On 24/03/13 12:30 PM, Xyne wrote:
Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
Objections were raised and then countered with arguments. If anyone felt
that
the objections were still valid after that then they should have replied
with
their reasons. That is the point of the discussion period: to discuss
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
The current (majority) voting system is fine -- making decisions based
on consensus agreement is not a suitable method for the TU selection
process (it would needlessly raise the bar for something that is not a
I have tried to stay out of this in that I am not a TU and my input carries
no official weight. I am, however, a moderator on the forums and a
professional with significant experience in the field of trust, so I hope
you give me some creed.
I find your argument to have no basis in fact and to be
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Eric Waller ewwal...@gmail.com wrote:
I have tried to stay out of this in that I am not a TU and my input carries
no official weight. I am, however, a moderator on the forums and a
professional with significant experience in the field of trust, so I hope
you
Xyne wrote:
The discussion period for graysky's application is over.
It's time for the TUs to vote: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=68
The voting period has ended. The finally tally was
yes: 12
no: 14
abstain: 4
Quorum has been met. I am sorry to announce that the application has been
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Xyne wrote:
The discussion period for graysky's application is over.
It's time for the TUs to vote: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=68
The voting period has ended. The finally tally was
yes: 12
no: 14
abstain: 4
Quorum has
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 7:01 PM, member graysky gray...@archlinux.uswrote:
Thanks for supporting the application, Xyne, and to those who
participated in the subsequent discussion. I was really happy to have
read the kind words from some of the the non-TUs who posted in support
of me as
Op zaterdag 23 maart 2013 17:51:42 schreef Xyne:
Xyne wrote:
The discussion period for graysky's application is over.
It's time for the TUs to vote: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=68
The voting period has ended. The finally tally was
yes: 12
no: 14
abstain: 4
Quorum has been met. I
On 23 March 2013 19:51, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
The voting period has ended. The finally tally was
yes: 12
no: 14
abstain: 4
Quorum has been met. I am sorry to announce that the application has been
rejected.
I certainly didn't see this coming: I can't believe so many TUs voted
NO
On 23 March 2013 17:51, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
@TUs
Voting no rather than abstaining indicates that you have reasons to reject
the candidate. These should have been brought up during the discussion period.
If they are valid then other TUs should be made aware of them and take them
Am 23.03.2013 18:51, schrieb Xyne:
Xyne wrote:
The discussion period for graysky's application is over.
It's time for the TUs to vote: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=68
The voting period has ended. The finally tally was
yes: 12
no: 14
abstain: 4
Quorum has been met. I am sorry to
Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
On 23 March 2013 17:51, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
@TUs
Voting no rather than abstaining indicates that you have reasons to reject
the candidate. These should have been brought up during the discussion
period.
If they are valid then other TUs should be made aware
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Xyne wrote:
@TUs
The discussion period for this application was relatively short with very few
participating TUs. The only real objections were raised by Dave (who even
admitted that he may be old and grumpy) and they were
On 03/23/2013 09:59 PM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Xyne wrote:
@TUs
The discussion period for this application was relatively short with very few
participating TUs. The only real objections were raised by Dave (who even
admitted
On 11/03/13 05:52 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 04:24:31PM -0400, member graysky wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All. Inspired by Allan's talk @ SINFO XX, I decided to throw my
hat into the ring and formally apply to be a TU. My linux history
If my opinion as a mere arch user counts for anything in this thread,
I'd like to express my gratitude towards graysky for his linux-ck
repository and AUR packages. I'm running that kernel without any
problem since 2011-04-10 (from my pacman.log). Honestly when I saw his
email about applying as a
On 2013-03-11 21:24, member graysky wrote:
Hi All. Inspired by Allan's talk @ SINFO XX, I decided to throw my
hat into the ring and formally apply to be a TU. My linux history
started with RH and SUSE over a decade ago. I discovered Debian and
Ubuntu. I found myself wanting more control
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
I was not aware of this and I admit that my enthusiasm for the application was
slightly diminished, but I stand by my sponsorship.
snip
But yeah, it would have been nice to get a full disclosure directly.
I didn't realize it
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski
b...@bpiotrowski.pl wrote:
I'm not sure if I should take part in the discussion, as my application
also hasn't specified anything besides packages I want to maintain, but…
As long as I understand (not only) your need of privacy, I would
On 12 March 2013 04:24, member graysky gray...@archlinux.us wrote:
Hi All. Inspired by Allan's talk @ SINFO XX, I decided to throw my
hat into the ring and formally apply to be a TU. My linux history
started with RH and SUSE over a decade ago. I discovered Debian and
Ubuntu. I found myself
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
2) To claim that you're saving your precious SSD unnecessary writes is
advanced silliness. Recent controllers don't have nearly the same
problems early SSDs had.
Phrases such as advanced silliness have no place in a serious
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
The username graysky sounds familiar to me, but it doesn't register
anything negative. At one glance, though, I can derive at least one
fact -- there have been applicants in the past much less competent. As
such, I
On 11 March 2013 22:24, member graysky gray...@archlinux.us wrote:
Hi All. Inspired by Allan's talk @ SINFO XX, I decided to throw my
hat into the ring and formally apply to be a TU.
As the maintainer of linux-pf AUR package and unofficial repo I
happened to interact with graysky a few times
Alexander Rødseth wrote:
While not handling spaces in directory names is kinda bad
+1
*glares at certain makepkg devs*
:P
Dave Reisner wrote:
I'm replying to the rest of this thread with full disclosure: graysky asked
me to sponsor him first, and I've declined based on a lack of skill and what
I feel isn't necessary the correct attitude for an Arch TU.
I don't understand the sudden scrutiny about skill level.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All. Inspired by Allan's talk @ SINFO XX, I decided to throw my
hat into the ring and formally apply to be a TU. My linux history
started with RH and SUSE over a decade ago. I discovered Debian and
Ubuntu. I found myself wanting more control
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All.
Your signature is bad; gmail probably mangled something.
Please resend using GPG/MIME (at least enigmail with thunderbird,
claws-mail, kmail support it).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian Pritz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All.
Your signature is bad; gmail probably mangled something.
Please resend using GPG/MIME (at least enigmail with thunderbird,
claws-mail, kmail support it).
While
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Try two using gmail to send an clearsigned message to this list...
Hi All. Inspired by Allan's talk @ SINFO XX, I decided to throw my
hat into the ring and formally apply to be a TU. My linux history
started with RH and SUSE over a decade ago. I
Sorry gang, apparently as Florian suggested, gmail is doing something
to the signed message rendering the signature BAD. I am trying now
to directly attach the asc file to see if it works before trying a
non-http based email client. Here goes...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Try
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 05:58:27PM -0400, member graysky wrote:
Try two using gmail to send an clearsigned message to this list...
Still bad. Try using a client, like Thunderbird or Mutt. I can only
vouch for Mutt in respect to signing well.
Hi All. Inspired by Allan's talk @ SINFO XX, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Try two using gmail to send an clearsigned message to this list...
Hi All. Inspired by Allan's talk @ SINFO XX, I decided to throw my
hat into the ring and formally apply to be a TU. My linux history
started with RH and SUSE over a decade ago. I
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:04 PM, William Giokas 1007...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 05:58:27PM -0400, member graysky wrote:
Try two using gmail to send an clearsigned message to this list...
Still bad. Try using a client, like Thunderbird or Mutt. I can only
vouch for Mutt in
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 06:11:50PM -0400, member graysky wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:04 PM, William Giokas 1007...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 05:58:27PM -0400, member graysky wrote:
Try two using gmail to send an clearsigned message to this list...
Still bad. Try using
member graysky wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:04 PM, William Giokas 1007...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 05:58:27PM -0400, member graysky wrote:
Try two using gmail to send an clearsigned message to this list...
Still bad. Try using a client, like Thunderbird or Mutt. I can only
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 06:11:50PM -0400, member graysky wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:04 PM, William Giokas 1007...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 05:58:27PM -0400, member graysky wrote:
Try two using gmail to send an clearsigned message to this list...
Still bad. Try using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/11/2013 3:04 PM, William Giokas wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 05:58:27PM -0400, member graysky wrote:
Try two using gmail to send an clearsigned message to this
list...
Still bad. Try using a client, like Thunderbird or Mutt. I can
only
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Daniel Wallace
danielwall...@gtmanfred.com wrote:
What type of packages do you plan on maintaining and what would you want
to move into the repos first?
Good question. For starters, several I use all the time and that have
the requisite # of votes:
alsi
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 04:24:31PM -0400, member graysky wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All. Inspired by Allan's talk @ SINFO XX, I decided to throw my
hat into the ring and formally apply to be a TU. My linux history
started with RH and SUSE over a decade ago. I
Dave Reisner wrote:
I'd like to address a few points.
I'm replying to the rest of this with full disclosure: graysky asked me
to sponsor him first, and I've declined based on a lack of skill and
what I feel isn't necessarily the correct attitude for an Arch TU.
I was not aware of this and I
On 26/02/13 22:12, Jonathan Steel wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 03:37:48PM +0100, Jorge Barroso wrote:
El Lunes, 25 de febrero de 2013 20:46:46 Vitor Eiji Justus Sakaguti escribió:
On Feb 25, 2013 4:26 PM, Connor Behan connor.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/02/13 08:09 AM, Rudy Matela wrote:
El Miércoles, 27 de febrero de 2013 10:09:38 Jelle van der Waa escribió:
On 26/02/13 22:12, Jonathan Steel wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 03:37:48PM +0100, Jorge Barroso wrote:
El Lunes, 25 de febrero de 2013 20:46:46 Vitor Eiji Justus Sakaguti
escribió:
On Feb 25, 2013 4:26 PM, Connor
El Lunes, 25 de febrero de 2013 20:46:46 Vitor Eiji Justus Sakaguti escribió:
On Feb 25, 2013 4:26 PM, Connor Behan connor.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/02/13 08:09 AM, Rudy Matela wrote:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trusted_Users#How_to_become_TU.3F
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:40:48PM -0800, Federico Cinelli wrote:
cinelli” is what I go by in #archlinux, the Arch Linux forums, the AUR, and
the
bug tracker. My full name is Federico Cinelli. My sponser is Daniel Wallace
(gtmanfred)
I have been an active member of the Arch Linux
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 03:37:48PM +0100, Jorge Barroso wrote:
El Lunes, 25 de febrero de 2013 20:46:46 Vitor Eiji Justus Sakaguti escribió:
On Feb 25, 2013 4:26 PM, Connor Behan connor.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/02/13 08:09 AM, Rudy Matela wrote:
Hi, I'm Jorge Barroso (jorge_barroso in the AUR), I've been an Arch user for
some time and I've learned a lot of things since I do it. Now, I'd like to
apply as a trusted user, so I'd like that anybody helped me telling me what
should I do yet to became a Trusted User
Regards
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trusted_Users#How_to_become_TU.3F
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Jorge Barroso
jorge_barroso...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm Jorge Barroso (jorge_barroso in the AUR), I've been an Arch user for
some time and I've learned a lot of things since I do it. Now,
On 25/02/13 08:09 AM, Rudy Matela wrote:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trusted_Users#How_to_become_TU.3F
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Jorge Barroso
jorge_barroso...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm Jorge Barroso (jorge_barroso in the AUR), I've been an Arch user for
some time and I've
Or wait to be a TU for doing such thing :)
Le lundi 25 février 2013 11:25:02 Connor Behan a écrit :
On 25/02/13 08:09 AM, Rudy Matela wrote:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trusted_Users#How_to_become_TU.3F
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Jorge Barroso
On Feb 25, 2013 4:26 PM, Connor Behan connor.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/02/13 08:09 AM, Rudy Matela wrote:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trusted_Users#How_to_become_TU.3F
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Jorge Barroso
jorge_barroso...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm Jorge Barroso
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:40:48PM -0800, Federico Cinelli wrote:
cinelli” is what I go by in #archlinux, the Arch Linux forums, the AUR, and
the
bug tracker. My full name is Federico Cinelli. My sponser is Daniel Wallace
(gtmanfred)
I have been an active member of the Arch Linux
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 01:04:17 -0300
Martín Cigorraga m...@archlinux.us wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Federico Cinelli
cinelli.feder...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow, that was quite a presentation, welcome.
Thank you.
--
Federico Cinelli cinelli.feder...@gmail.com
Stay true.
On 14.02.2013 06:40, Federico Cinelli wrote:
For the past six months I've been working on getting more in-tune with the
forums.
I've recently started answering posts on the forums and working with people
that
request PKGBUILDs.
I found 6 bbs posts and 5 posts to the MLs all from this year.
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:52:07 +0100
Florian Pritz bluew...@xinu.at wrote:
On 14.02.2013 06:40, Federico Cinelli wrote:
For the past six months I've been working on getting more in-tune with the
forums.
I've recently started answering posts on the forums and working with people
that
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:05:10 +0800
Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Daniel Micay wrote:
I'll even forgive you for being a closet iPhone user. :)
In light of this revelation and by section 5, subsection 3, paragraph 2
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Federico Cinelli
cinelli.feder...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow, that was quite a presentation, welcome.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Federico Cinelli
cinelli.feder...@gmail.com wrote:
cinelli” is what I go by in #archlinux, the Arch Linux forums, the AUR, and
the
bug tracker. My full name is Federico Cinelli. My sponser is Daniel Wallace
(gtmanfred)
I have been an active member of the
Daniel Micay wrote:
I'll even forgive you for being a closet iPhone user. :)
In light of this revelation and by section 5, subsection 3, paragraph 2 of the
TU bylaws, I hereby move for summary rejection of this application.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Daniel Micay wrote:
I'll even forgive you for being a closet iPhone user. :)
In light of this revelation and by section 5, subsection 3, paragraph 2 of the
TU bylaws, I hereby move for summary rejection of this application.
Le mercredi 13 février 2013 02:42:02 Sven-Hendrik Haase a écrit :
It would seem that voting period is over. Alucryd is now a TU!
I've updated your user account. Please follow the new TU guidelines on
the wiki. Make sure to get into IRC, get your key signed, tell someone
to update your account
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 02:42 +0100, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
It would seem that voting period is over. Alucryd is now a TU!
I've updated your user account. Please follow the new TU guidelines on
the wiki. Make sure to get into IRC, get your key signed, tell someone
to update your account
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 09:05 +0100, Laurent Carlier wrote:
Le mercredi 13 février 2013 02:42:02 Sven-Hendrik Haase a écrit :
It would seem that voting period is over. Alucryd is now a TU!
I've updated your user account. Please follow the new TU guidelines on
the wiki. Make sure to get
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:28:20AM +0100, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 09:05 +0100, Laurent Carlier wrote:
Le mercredi 13 février 2013 02:42:02 Sven-Hendrik Haase a écrit :
It would seem that voting period is over. Alucryd is now a TU!
I've updated your user account.
Congrats :)
- Alexander
901 - 1000 of 2288 matches
Mail list logo
