Re: [aur-general] TU removal: Ray Rashif

2019-10-21 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general
Em outubro 20, 2019 14:19 Ray Rashif via aur-general escreveu: Sorry folks, I should have probably sent in a resignation for this. I have also made unfulfilled promises as a developer and never sent in an inactivity declaration in the hopes of getting back to Arch/Linux once I have a new computer

Re: [aur-general] TU removal: Ray Rashif

2019-10-20 Thread Ray Rashif via aur-general
Sorry folks, I should have probably sent in a resignation for this. I have also made unfulfilled promises as a developer and never sent in an inactivity declaration in the hopes of getting back to Arch/Linux once I have a new computer. As funny as it sounds my undeclared inactivity is as long as th

Re: [aur-general] TU removal: Ray Rashif

2019-10-16 Thread David Runge
On 2019-10-11 14:44:27 (+0200), David Runge wrote: > In accordance to the bylaws a vote has now been started: > https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=120 The results are in: Yes: 36 No: 7 Abstain: 6 Total: 49 Participation: 87.50% The quorum of 66% has been reached with a larger number of "Yes", than

Re: [aur-general] TU removal: Ray Rashif

2019-10-11 Thread David Runge
On 2019-10-08 14:35:22 (+0200), David Runge wrote: > I would like to start the discussion period for a Trusted User removal > of Ray 'schiv' Rashif on the grounds of 'Special Removal of an > Inactive TU' [1]. Note, that this is separate from any motion in > regards to Ray's developer status. In acc

Re: [aur-general] TU removal: Ray Rashif

2019-10-08 Thread David Runge
Hey Giancarlo, On 2019-10-08 10:41:44 (-0300), Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote: > I believe that the discussion period for removal by inactivity is 3 > days, not 7. The voting period is 5 days. Correct, somehow I had the 'Removal of a TU' rules in mind when writing the mail. > Other th

Re: [aur-general] TU removal: Ray Rashif

2019-10-08 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general
Em outubro 8, 2019 9:35 David Runge escreveu: The voting procedure will commence after seven days of discussion period, in which Ray can state his case. I believe that the discussion period for removal by inactivity is 3 days, not 7. The voting period is 5 days. Other than that, the current

Re: [aur-general] TU removal: Ray Rashif

2019-10-08 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase via aur-general
On 08.10.19 14:35, David Runge wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to start the discussion period for a Trusted User removal > of Ray 'schiv' Rashif on the grounds of 'Special Removal of an Inactive > TU' [1]. Note, that this is separate from any motion in regards to Ray's > developer status. > >

[aur-general] TU removal: Ray Rashif

2019-10-08 Thread David Runge
Hi all, I would like to start the discussion period for a Trusted User removal of Ray 'schiv' Rashif on the grounds of 'Special Removal of an Inactive TU' [1]. Note, that this is separate from any motion in regards to Ray's developer status. Currently Ray is the maintainer of 60 packages in [comm