On 2013-08-07 16:52 +0200
Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
>> After my previous reply I spent a little time thinking about the current
>> bylaws
>> and our notions of activity. I have posted a message to the list with a
>> modified version of the bylaws to begin a discussion (i.e. the version I have
>
Dave Reisner wrote:
>Keenerd launched his bot before he was even a TU. His decision to do so
>made him reconsider his application for the cooldown period before
>re-applying. If he spoke to anyone about it on IRC it was with me over
>private messages. There was zero involvement from any Arch assoc
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Xyne wrote:
> Angel Velásquez wrote:
>
>>Supa easy, open the TU panel at the AUR, check who voted and who didn't
>>on the lasts SVP (the last three or more if you want) .. make some
>>decision about it, yeah we made the quorum but still, what about these
>>people th
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 02:23:54PM +, Xyne wrote:
> On 2013-08-07 14:30 +0200
> Florian Pritz wrote:
>
> >On 07.08.2013 13:33, Xyne wrote:
> >> I find this annoying. I have heard on several occasions that a lot of
> >> relevant
> >> discussion as well as shit-talking takes place on that chann
On 7 August 2013 20:11, Angel Velásquez wrote:
> Supa easy, open the TU panel at the AUR, check who voted and who didn't
> on the lasts SVP (the last three or more if you want) .. make some
> decision about it, yeah we made the quorum but still, what about these
> people that is marked as active,
On 2013-08-07 14:30 +0200
Florian Pritz wrote:
>On 07.08.2013 13:33, Xyne wrote:
>> I find this annoying. I have heard on several occasions that a lot of
>> relevant
>> discussion as well as shit-talking takes place on that channel. Sometimes
>> even
>> important decisions are made there.
>
>I l
Angel Velásquez wrote:
>Supa easy, open the TU panel at the AUR, check who voted and who didn't
>on the lasts SVP (the last three or more if you want) .. make some
>decision about it, yeah we made the quorum but still, what about these
>people that is marked as active, do packaging stuff but are w
On 07.08.2013 13:33, Xyne wrote:
> I find this annoying. I have heard on several occasions that a lot of relevant
> discussion as well as shit-talking takes place on that channel. Sometimes even
> important decisions are made there.
I like IRC because it allows you to decide on a basic direction.
On 07/08/13 08:33, Xyne wrote:
> On 2013-08-02 15:40 -0300
> Angel Velásquez wrote:
>
>> Having that set, I am shocked about how the bylaws are being just used
>> just for addition process, but for somehow are being ignored for stuff
>> like quorum and removal procedures, some TUs look to othersid
On 2013-08-02 15:40 -0300
Angel Velásquez wrote:
>Having that set, I am shocked about how the bylaws are being just used
>just for addition process, but for somehow are being ignored for stuff
>like quorum and removal procedures, some TUs look to otherside when we
>mention this subject.
Can you m
Xyne wrote:
>Lukas Fleischer wrote:
>
>>The only difference is that a new active TU appearing during the vote
>>results in an overvalued quorum if the number is computed at the
>>beginning (and if the TU votes), whereas an active TU disappearing
>>during the vote results in an overvalued quorum if
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
>The only difference is that a new active TU appearing during the vote
>results in an overvalued quorum if the number is computed at the
>beginning (and if the TU votes), whereas an active TU disappearing
>during the vote results in an overvalued quorum if the number is
>com
On 5 August 2013 07:00, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> I don't really like the idea of having to specify an exact end date. If
> you are inactive due to, say, a long hospital stay or a lack of an
> internet connection after moving you will have to update the end date
> continuously. Being inactive usual
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 06:32:57AM +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> On 4 August 2013 21:35, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> > Trying to automate this, I just submitted a couple of AUR patches to
> > aur-dev [1].
> >
> > Based on this, we could:
> >
> > * Add another simple patch that simply displays whe
On 4 August 2013 21:35, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> Trying to automate this, I just submitted a couple of AUR patches to
> aur-dev [1].
>
> Based on this, we could:
>
> * Add another simple patch that simply displays whether a vote is
> accepted or not. This leaves no room for discussion on the res
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 05:45:04PM +0200, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Lukas Fleischer
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 03:40:53PM -0300, Angel Velásquez wrote:
> >> Hi people,
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> Having that set, I am shocked about how the bylaws are bei
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Lukas Fleischer
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 03:40:53PM -0300, Angel Velásquez wrote:
>> Hi people,
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Having that set, I am shocked about how the bylaws are being just used
>> just for addition process, but for somehow are being ignored for stuff
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 03:40:53PM -0300, Angel Velásquez wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> [...]
>
> Having that set, I am shocked about how the bylaws are being just used
> just for addition process, but for somehow are being ignored for stuff
> like quorum and removal procedures, some TUs look to others
On 3 August 2013 02:40, Angel Velásquez wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> First of all, i'm writting this mail as an ex TU and user, not as a dev
> who want to push you how to proceed or follow the bylaws.
>
> Having that set, I am shocked about how the bylaws are being just used
> just for addition process
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Angel Velásquez wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> First of all, i'm writting this mail as an ex TU and user, not as a dev
> who want to push you how to proceed or follow the bylaws.
>
> Having that set, I am shocked about how the bylaws are being just used
> just for addition
Hi people,
First of all, i'm writting this mail as an ex TU and user, not as a dev
who want to push you how to proceed or follow the bylaws.
Having that set, I am shocked about how the bylaws are being just used
just for addition process, but for somehow are being ignored for stuff
like quorum an
21 matches
Mail list logo
