> I was aware Jelle went on vacation, which is why I was ok waiting for him
> to come back.
> As someone mentioned on IRC, TU's are humans too. Anyway, I want to thank
> you all for
> this opportunity. I will start on the TODO right now.
Sorry about that :) Needed some vacation and time
> Heh, seems Jelle inconveniently went on vacation just before it ended, so on
> behalf of Jelle:
>
> Congrats grazzolini, you've been accepted!
>
> Yes: 20
> No: 6
> Abstain: 6
Thanks Johannes for sending this e-mail!
I admit I was secretly hiding in the desert!
>
> Please continue by
On 2016-11-10 14:00 +
Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
> As someone mentioned on IRC, TU's are humans too.
Filthy lies! Don't believe everything you read online.
Welcome aboard!
On Thu, 2016-11-10 at 10:07 +0100, Johannes Löthberg via aur-general wrote:
> On 27/10, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > On 10/20/16 at 11:23am, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > My name is Giancarlo Razzolini (grazzolini) and I would like to
> > > become a TU.
Em novembro 10, 2016 7:07 Johannes Löthberg via aur-general escreveu:
Heh, seems Jelle inconveniently went on vacation just before it ended,
so on behalf of Jelle:
Congrats grazzolini, you've been accepted!
Yes: 20
No: 6
Abstain: 6
Please continue by following the TODO for new Trusted
>
> Heh, seems Jelle inconveniently went on vacation just before it ended, so on
> behalf of Jelle:
>
> Congrats grazzolini, you've been accepted!
>
> Yes: 20
> No: 6
> Abstain: 6
>
Oh of course - how did I forget he went on vacation.
Congratulations, grazzolini, and best wishes ☺
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:28:42PM +0200, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
>
> The discussion period has ended, please cast your votes!
>
I assume voting period is still seven days and has ended,
what was result?
Thanks
On 10/20/16 at 11:23am, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> My name is Giancarlo Razzolini (grazzolini) and I would like to
> become a TU. Before anything, I want to thank Jelle van der Waa for
> agreeing to become my sponsor.
The discussion period has ended, please
Em outubro 23, 2016 22:17 Levente Polyak escreveu:
On 10/24/2016 01:32 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
Well I actually don't planned to jump in again on this topic... but if
you fully agree on all that, then it pretty much boils down to the fact
that you definitively want to get
On 10/24/2016 01:32 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
> Em outubro 22, 2016 13:17 Florian Pritz via aur-general escreveu:
>>
>> I feel like the goal should be that every AUR package is in a state that
>> allows it to be simply moved to community without requiring any changes.
>> [...]
Em outubro 22, 2016 13:17 Florian Pritz via aur-general escreveu:
I feel like the goal should be that every AUR package is in a state that
allows it to be simply moved to community without requiring any changes.
Sadly, most of the time I want to move stuff I have to invest a couple
of
On 21.10.2016 14:19, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
> Em outubro 21, 2016 10:10 Levente Polyak escreveu:
>>
>> Well I don't see why it shouldn't be but as long as it's the AUR most likely
>> that won't be enforce anyway as there isn't even proper UID GID registry.
>>
> I don't plan
Em outubro 21, 2016 10:10 Levente Polyak escreveu:
Well I don't see why it shouldn't be but as long as it's the AUR most likely that won't be enforce anyway as there isn't even proper UID GID registry.
But any package in the repo must not delete user and group accounts, that's what that TODO
On October 21, 2016 1:38:06 PM GMT+02:00, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general
wrote:
>>
>> I would say: just leave it around. In fact we had a big TODO list [0]
>> cleaning up all the userdel from all packages in the whole repos (not
>> the AUR).
>> It doesn't hurt
Em outubro 20, 2016 17:36 Levente Polyak escreveu:
Hi Giancarlo,
Well I don't see reason to have a checksum for that one, its contained
within the source (PKGBUILD) and not downloaded from a remote.
It either comes through git or via a pkg-src tarball. The PKGBUILD
itself (that contains that
Hi Giancarlo,
On 10/20/2016 08:51 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
>- I am aware that the .install file does not need to be on the
> sources. But If I am not
> mistaken, if it is not on the sources array, it also does not
> have it's checksum
> validated.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general
wrote:
> Em outubro 20, 2016 15:39 Levente Polyak escreveu:
>>
>> Hi Giancarlo,
>>
>> thanks for your application and jelle for sponsoring.
>>
>> As always I want to give my 2 cents to your PKGBUILDs
Em outubro 20, 2016 15:39 Levente Polyak escreveu:
Hi Giancarlo,
thanks for your application and jelle for sponsoring.
As always I want to give my 2 cents to your PKGBUILDs so you could
improve certain points before the voting period starts.
Please don't be scared! :)
cheers,
Levente
PS:
On 10/20/16 at 11:23am, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> My name is Giancarlo Razzolini (grazzolini) and I would like to
> become a TU. Before anything, I want to thank Jelle van der Waa for
> agreeing to become my sponsor.
I confirm sponsoring grazzolini! Let the
Hi All,
My name is Giancarlo Razzolini (grazzolini) and I would like to become a TU.
Before anything, I want to thank Jelle van der Waa for agreeing to become my
sponsor.
I'm 33 years old. I am a developer and infrastructure manager at my own
company. I have been using Linux since 1999.
20 matches
Mail list logo