On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Florian Pritz
wrote:
>
>
> Welcome and good job reaching 100% ;)
>
> --
> Florian Pritz -- {flo,bluewi...@server-speed.net
>
>
Now let's get OVER 9000 !!!
What !? Can't be done ?
--
Cédric Girard
On Saturday 11 December 2010 20:21:53 Dave Reisner wrote:
> > yes 29
> > no 0
> > abstain 1
> >
> > Welcome in our team.
> >
> > Todo:
> > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines#TODO_lis
> > t_for_new_Trusted_Users
>
> Wow! I'm just going to play dumb and assum
On 11.12.2010 21:05, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 12/05/2010 02:54 AM, Dave Reisner wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:39:13AM +0100, PyroPeter wrote:
>>> On 12/04/2010 07:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
Hi,
the 5 days discussion period have ended.
http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=4
On 11 December 2010 21:05, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 12/05/2010 02:54 AM, Dave Reisner wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:39:13AM +0100, PyroPeter wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/04/2010 07:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
Hi,
the 5 days discussion period have ended.
http://aur.archli
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Xyne wrote:
> * gets out some snacks and sits down in his designated TU comfy-chair *
>
Oh man that's a great idea. Why don't I have a designated TU comfy-chair?
Welcome to the team Dave. --Kaiting.
--
Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
On 2010-12-12 05:18 +0800 (49:7)
Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 12 December 2010 04:05, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> > good news. This is the first time, since i'm a TU, when we reached 100%
> > quorum.
>
> First time in the history of the AUR as we know it. Congrats and welcome!
> >>42!
> >>
> >
> >Yup, that
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:21:53 -0500 Dave Reisner
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:05:42PM +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> > On 12/05/2010 02:54 AM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> > >On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:39:13AM +0100, PyroPeter wrote:
> > >>On 12/04/2010 07:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> > >>>Hi,
> > >>>
>
Le samedi 11 décembre 2010 21:05:42, Ionuț Bîru a écrit :
> On 12/05/2010 02:54 AM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:39:13AM +0100, PyroPeter wrote:
> >> On 12/04/2010 07:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> the 5 days discussion period have ended.
> >>>
> >>> http://a
On 12 December 2010 04:05, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> good news. This is the first time, since i'm a TU, when we reached 100%
> quorum.
First time in the history of the AUR as we know it. Congrats and welcome!
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:05:42PM +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 12/05/2010 02:54 AM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> >On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:39:13AM +0100, PyroPeter wrote:
> >>On 12/04/2010 07:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>the 5 days discussion period have ended.
> >>>
> >>>http://aur.ar
On 12/05/2010 02:54 AM, Dave Reisner wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:39:13AM +0100, PyroPeter wrote:
On 12/04/2010 07:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
Hi,
the 5 days discussion period have ended.
http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=42
42!
Yup, that's right. 42. Vote wisely, gentlemen. We may v
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Kaiting Chen wrote:
>>
>> We could amend the bylaws to state that quorum is not required if an
>> absolute
>> majority has voted to pass the motion (an absolute majority being more than
>> half of all active TUs). I think that makes sense because as it stands now,
>
>
> We could amend the bylaws to state that quorum is not required if an
> absolute
> majority has voted to pass the motion (an absolute majority being more than
> half of all active TUs). I think that makes sense because as it stands now,
> voting against the motion or simply abstaining is complet
Loui Chang wrote:
> On Sun 05 Dec 2010 08:19 -0500, Shacristo wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Kaiting Chen wrote:
> > > This is sort of what I was talking about in my previous mail about
> > > the refinement of the bylaws. Thirteen hours have passed since the
> > > beginning of the vot
On Sun 05 Dec 2010 08:19 -0500, Shacristo wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Kaiting Chen wrote:
> > This is sort of what I was talking about in my previous mail about
> > the refinement of the bylaws. Thirteen hours have passed since the
> > beginning of the voting period and at this point
17/30 does not make a 66% quorum, so yes, the motion could still fail.
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Kaiting Chen wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:39:13AM +0100, PyroPeter wrote:
>> > On 12/04/2010 07:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
>> > >Hi
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:39:13AM +0100, PyroPeter wrote:
> > On 12/04/2010 07:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >the 5 days discussion period have ended.
> > >
> > >http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=42
> > >
> >
> > 42!
> >
>
> Yu
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:39:13AM +0100, PyroPeter wrote:
> On 12/04/2010 07:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >the 5 days discussion period have ended.
> >
> >http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=42
> >
>
> 42!
>
Yup, that's right. 42. Vote wisely, gentlemen. We may very well unfold
the mean
On 05.12.2010 01:39, PyroPeter wrote:
> On 12/04/2010 07:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the 5 days discussion period have ended.
>>
>> http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=42
>>
>
> 42!
>
1.40500612 × 10^51
On 12/04/2010 07:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
Hi,
the 5 days discussion period have ended.
http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=42
42!
--
freenode/pyropeter "12:50 - Ich drücke Return."
Hi,
the 5 days discussion period have ended.
http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=42
--
Ionuț
21 matches
Mail list logo
