Re: [aur-general] AUR Requests

2014-02-01 Thread Rob McCathie
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Michael Schubert wrote: > Hi, > > (Maintainers, if any, are in CC.) > > Could you please merge: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-imaging/ -> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-imaging-alt/ ** > Reason: PIL is being phased out by pillow; 1st

Re: [aur-general] AUR Requests

2014-02-09 Thread Jonathan Steel
On Sun 02 Feb 2014 at 13:24, Rob McCathie wrote: > On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Michael Schubert wrote: > > Hi, > > > > (Maintainers, if any, are in CC.) > > > > Could you please merge: > > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-imaging/ -> > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python

Re: [aur-general] AUR Requests

2014-02-09 Thread Jonathan Steel
On Sat 01 Feb 2014 at 23:53, Michael Schubert wrote: > Hi, > > (Maintainers, if any, are in CC.) > > Could you please merge: > [...] > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-socksipy-branch/ -> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-socks/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-

Re: [aur-general] AUR requests not handled anymore?

2020-05-05 Thread Daniel M. Capella via aur-general
On May 6, 2020 1:55:55 AM EDT, Christoph Gysin via aur-general wrote: > I have made two deletion requests on my packages 2 weeks ago, that > were > never handled: > > https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2020-April/039815.html > https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/20

Re: [aur-general] [aur-requests] [PRQ#4831] Request Accepted

2016-02-22 Thread Maciej Sieczka
W dniu 22.02.2016 o 15:08, Lukas Fleischer pisze: On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 at 02:46:56, Maciej Sieczka wrote: W dniu 21.02.2016 o 21:34, not...@aur.archlinux.org pisze: [...] When some time passed, he eventualy implemented most of the bits he previously removed during his "cleanup" (some being hacks,