No, I was the one who messed things up. I clicked on the button to reply to you
outside of the list, which meant you had to create a new thread.
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
Apologies for replying incorrectly. The original thread would be at
https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-general@lists.archlinux.org/thread/T4I2ZYPOPHTIKYJTUSB7CMHSNA6BHIZ7/.
--
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
OpenPGP_0x4E85967FC7C436BE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Ahoy!
Yeah, it seems I got confused over the two interfaces. Sorry about that,
I'm the dense one.
--
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
OpenPGP_0x4E85967FC7C436BE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Okay, I've just realized that Arch also has RfCs. Where can I view
in-draft RfCs?
--
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
OpenPGP_0x4E85967FC7C436BE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ey,
1. Not sure what RFC0032 is. All I see is "Some Thoughts on SRI's
Proposed Real Time Clock, February 1970".
2. The AUR already has filtering by architecture. It seems like AUR folk
just don't want to moderate ARM packages.
--
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
OpenPGP_0x4E85967FC7C436BE.asc
Description:
Besides what Kimiblock said, the difference between the normal package and a
package with a -qt suffix is also much clearer to anyone not familiar with UOS
mythos.
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
You can check out Prevete's Twitter account.
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
> On Mar 18, 2024, at 7:01 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 01:56:17 +0100 "Rein Fernhout (Levitating)"
> said:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> Can we please wrap this up? I don't care if Tallero gets permanently
>> suspended or
Ey,
Something you might want to work on is differentiating between the
contexts of emails and chats. I see that you have Telegram configured as
your email client, so you may not realize that. Many people, including
me, try to contain everything we have to say in a single message instead
of
Ey,
> On Mar 17, 2024, at 2:36 AM, 7Ji wrote:
>
> > Maligning other FOSS projects or distributions, or any other operating
> > systems and their users is prohibited.
>
> The FOSS here only limits the scope before the first comma, not after. We
> should show respect towards other projects,
Ey,
Welcome to the mailing lists! Please read and follow
our [guidelines][1]. Specifically, try to use plain text emails.
Also, I've noticed that your PKGBUILD includes a lot of packages
included in "base" as dependencies. Please don't do that; packages
installed as part of "base" are part
Ey,
While I agree with most of your points...
Additionally, the maintainer is ... being unfriendly to both tencent
and WeChat, phrasing them as "trash" in the startup script[i], ...
clearly a violation to the Arch Linux Code of Conduct[l]
How does being unfriendly to a proprietary
Ey,
If the package doesn't exist but its repository does, it means the package
existed but was deleted. Anyone can now push to that repository to list the
package again, but I'd advise you to search for the deletion request first.
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
Ey,
A while ago I made the AUR package perl-acme-cow, which is needed for some
cowfiles bundled with cowsay. Is there a process for dependencies to enter
extra? I understand that it's not popular and doesn't meet the requirement, but
without it, attempting to use certain bundled cowfiles
Ey,
Does installing cahute and removing the other packages break existing files? If
not, you should be able to use replaces.
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
Ey,
I've let a software as any other being accessible through a package,
exactly same way as a let's say, a flash version of tuxrace.
Super Mario Bros. 1 and 2 (USA or otherwise) are proprietary and still
under copyright. The internet archive hosts them as a library, so
downloading them
These should be an option at old.reddit.com/prefs to not use new Reddit, and
thus always get the old version at www. Should minimize the headaches you get
with old and dusty Reddit links.
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
> On Mar 4, 2024, at 12:36 PM, Abraham S.A.H. wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Odd, I've been accessing
I think you should just disown. I don't think people should be able to
decide what's best for the user by removing working packages that aren't
duplicates
--
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
OpenPGP_0x4E85967FC7C436BE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Hi there, the rest of your email got cut off. We only see "A malicious".
--
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
OpenPGP_0x4E85967FC7C436BE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
See Heusel's reply. It was not transferred; it was merged into its -bin
AUR package.
--
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
OpenPGP_0x4E85967FC7C436BE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
They've already been warned. You replied to the email that was before
they were warned. After that, they've only sent one extra email.
I had probably the same problem as you: for some reason Gmail thinks
these messages were sent later than Antiz's warning, when they were
actually sent before
I think you should heed Antiz’s warnings. Links in another thread, or nothing.
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
> On Jan 28, 2024, at 10:08 AM, Pellegrino Prevete
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> In contrast to what he is stating about me, I do build and test the packages
>> from AUR and give feedback and recommendations
I think you should heed Antiz’s warnings. Links in another thread, or nothing.
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
If you really want to start something (which I personally would advise
against, MarsSeed is pretty helpful IMO), you would start a new thread
here complete with receipts (a.k.a. links to the specific incidents you
are complaining about.)
--
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
OpenPGP_0x4E85967FC7C436BE.asc
Changing the license does indeed change the package, as it means that
different license files are installed, though I'm not sure whether that
warrants bumping the pkgrel, and spamming the same comment across
several packages by the same maintainer is certainly disruptive. That
said, I've only
Ah, thanks.
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
I am quite confused here, nobody seems to have sent 3 emails. Which person
would you be talking about?
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
Greetings AUR users, (hmm I sound like an alien)
This package on the AUR called oh-my-zsh-git has been occasionally
flagged by people who do not understand that you have to add a line to
zshrc to start using it. I suggested a clearer and less suspicious
postinstall message, which the
Hi,
According to manual.wiringx.org , wiringX is only a library and nothing
else. I don't think the splitting into two packages part applies here,
as there is nothing to install other than the library.
--
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
OpenPGP_0x4E85967FC7C436BE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Hmm,
I know nothing on the library side of things, but as Arch conventions
dictate:
1. All package titles should be lowercase, so wiringx-git, perhaps?.
2. You should probably do a provides=(libwiringx.so wiringx) so the
soname is searchable and conflicts are better detected
3. According to
Ah, that makes a lot more sense, thanks.
Perhaps your email to that TU was blocked by a spam filter? You may want
to contact the Arch forums with your summary.
Looking at the archived PKGBUILD, yes, that (using curl to fetch fields)
is low quality. The checksum field is supposed to be
You do not simply "address" a deletion by reuploading the package
without any changes. You should've consulted someone like you recently
did here. The first communication from you that I know was what you sent
here to this mailing list.
Also, welcome to the mailing list! Please have a look at
> On Dec 19, 2023, at 7:35 AM, myself...@tutanota.de wrote:
>
>
> @Marcell Meszaros: The package is about solving freedom related issues, so I
> don't see a point in your comment.
Mars’s point was that that kernel targets Debian distributions and don’t have
the patches wanted for Arch use.
There are already such packages such as linux-libre that actually target
arch.
--
Cheers,
Aᴀʀᴏɴ
OpenPGP_0x4E85967FC7C436BE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I, for one, have never heard of using “w” as “without”. W much, much commonly
means “with”.
> On Nov 22, 2023, at 9:31 AM, Björn Bidar wrote:
>
>
> Hey,
>
> I fully agree with that statement. The automated checks can only go so
> far.
> Of course there are cases where the package has been
Looking at
https://web.archive.org/web/20231017082509/https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/papermerge,
it appears this has been marked out of date since 2021-04-19.
TrialnError was accepted as maintainer on the condition that they could
get v2 working, which they only did by starting work on the
How do "home backups" fall under fair-use? How can you maintain
plausible deniability when there's an entire AUR request IRC discussion
and mailing list chain about it?
On 2023/9/26 20:32, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 9/26/23 13:11, netsysf...@das-labor.org wrote:
There are two reasons for the
The problem is not that there's an alternative version, it's that
there's a totally different package with the same provides
On 2023/9/12 6:57, Polarian wrote:
Hello,
In order to deal with conflicts you should add the following fields to
your PKGBUILD:
provides=('polyglot')
According to
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#conflicts
These packages are in conflict.
They have the exact same source.
On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 3:29 PM Aaron Liu wrote:
I don't see why you're that infuriated. xiota is indeed a bit
combative with language but save for removing `conflicts` their
I don't see why you're that infuriated. xiota is indeed a bit combative
with language but save for removing `conflicts` their suggestions all
look good. Simply adding the "no same owner" removes the need for all
that find chmod and chown stuff and just put the conflicting packing
name under
Oops, I've sent this to the arch-general mailing list instead! I meant
to send this to aur-general, sorry. I guess forwarding it should be fine.
On 9/1/23 15:15, Aaron Liu wrote:
Currently, there are 2 packages for the latest Waterfox "current":
waterfox-g-bin and waterfox-current-
40 matches
Mail list logo
