[PRQ#61166] Merge Request for gnome-system-monitor-gtk3

2024-06-29 Thread notify
yochananmarqos [1] filed a request to merge gnome-system-monitor-gtk3 [2] into gnome-system-monitor-linuxmint [3]: Duplicate package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yochananmarqos/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gnome-system-monitor-gtk3/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gnome-

Re: [PRQ#61166] Merge Request for gnome-system-monitor-gtk3

2024-06-30 Thread E4xgdh3FyLT7HnfonDcVqXWD
My sincerest apologies for missing the existence of [1] gnome-system-monitor-linuxmint. I was using [2] gnome-system-monitor-gtk3 as a personal PKGBUILD for a good while and I failed to realize that a similar package has already been uploaded to the AUR, this month. This is the first PR/Merge r

Re: [PRQ#61166] Merge Request for gnome-system-monitor-gtk3

2024-06-30 Thread Robin Candau
On 6/30/24 12:30 PM, E4xgdh3FyLT7HnfonDcVqXWD wrote: [..] This is the first PR/Merge request that I have received via the AUR and would like to comply/accept the PR. Unfortunately, I am unaware on how to go about this, so I may need some assistance if user action is needed on my end. [..] AUR

[PRQ#61166] Merge Request for gnome-system-monitor-gtk3 Accepted

2024-06-30 Thread notify
Request #61166 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]: I'm accepting this request but, just for the record, there's nothing to merge (no comment or vote) so there no need to go for a merge request over a deletion one in this case. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/

Re: [PRQ#61166] Merge Request for gnome-system-monitor-gtk3 Accepted

2024-06-30 Thread E4xgdh3FyLT7HnfonDcVqXWD
Understood. Sorry about that. Thank you very much and have a good rest of the day :) . On Sunday, June 30th, 2024 at 11:46 AM, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > Request #61166 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]: > > I'm accepting this request but, just for the record, there's nothing > to merge

Re: [PRQ#61166] Merge Request for gnome-system-monitor-gtk3 Accepted

2024-06-30 Thread Robin Candau
On 6/30/24 6:44 PM, E4xgdh3FyLT7HnfonDcVqXWD wrote: Understood. Sorry about that. This was addressed to the person that submitted the merge request, not to you. So don't worry you did nothing wrong ;) Either way, this was just for information, no big deal :) Thank you very much and have a