ber 2017 5:37 PM
> To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
> Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] ASG29R
>
> I attended a talk by Gerhard Waibel about 10 years ago (or maybe 15 years
> ago).
>
> Among other things he talked about the wing fuselage intersec
;
>
>
> *From:* Aus-soaring [mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.base64.com.au] *On
> Behalf Of *Peter Champness
> *Sent:* Thursday, 28 December 2017 5:37 PM
> *To:* Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
> *Subject:* Re: [Aus-soaring] ASG29R
>
>
>
> I attended
:37 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] ASG29R
I attended a talk by Gerhard Waibel about 10 years ago (or maybe 15 years ago).
Among other things he talked about the wing fuselage intersection drag. His
idea was to raise the wing
I've seen a photo of a Std Cirrus where that
was done. Just the pylon, no struts. mid 1970s.
Mike
At 05:36 PM 12/28/2017, you wrote:
I attended a talk by Gerhard Waibel about 10
years ago (or maybe 15 years ago).
Among other things he talked about the wing
fuselage intersection drag.Â
I attended a talk by Gerhard Waibel about 10 years ago (or maybe 15 years
ago).
Among other things he talked about the wing fuselage intersection drag.
His idea was to raise the wing on a thin pylon more than 200mm above the
fuselage and then support the wing with struts! I thought that was
Yes, as Bernard said there are other composite sailplanes with high
wings. Phoebus C, Std Jantar 2/3, ASW 15.
However have another look at the Mu 31, the fuselage cross section in
particular where at around pilot shoulder height it necks in. This is
more like the Weihe, Meise (Olympia),
what does that mean??
On 26 December 2017 at 11:20, Adam Woolley wrote:
>
> ___
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> Aus-soaring@lists.base64.com.au
> http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring
>
>
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.base64.com.au
http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring