Re: [aus-soaring] Best sunglasses for gliding ?

2004-10-01 Thread Leigh Bunting
Peter and Mandy Temple wrote: Whereas the normal visual field extends 50 degrees superiorly, 70 degrees inferiorly, 90 degrees temporally and 60 degrees nasally. So it is theoretically possible to have a peripheral field loss that would not show up with central testing. Hi Mandy, With respect

Re: [Aus-soaring] FW: Airspace Issues

2004-10-01 Thread Mike Borgelt
At 06:12 PM 1/10/04 +0930, you wrote: Latest on airspace from Bob Hall Cheers David It seems this is a giant stuff up. Obviously there were elements in Airservices who were preparing to rollback the NAS even before it got implemented. Given the extremely late send out of the NAS education

Re: [Aus-soaring] [Fwd: National Airspace Seminars]

2004-10-01 Thread John Giddy
On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 17:23:10 +0930, you wrote: I received a flyer from CASA advising of a range of seminars, one of which is National Airspace. We should flock to this to make our point about the roll back. The following link has info about the seminars and registering:

Re: [Aus-soaring] [Fwd: National Airspace Seminars]

2004-10-01 Thread Mike Cleaver
At 05:23 PM 1/10/2004 +0930, you wrote: I received a flyer from CASA advising of a range of seminars, one of which is National Airspace. We should flock to this to make our point about the roll back. The following link has info about the seminars and registering:

Re: [Aus-soaring] [Fwd: National Airspace Seminars]

2004-10-01 Thread Mike Borgelt
At 07:50 PM 1/10/04 +1000, you wrote: At 05:23 PM 1/10/2004 +0930, you wrote: I received a flyer from CASA advising of a range of seminars, one of which is National Airspace. We should flock to this to make our point about the roll back. The following link has info about the seminars and

Re: [Aus-soaring] [Fwd: National Airspace Seminars]

2004-10-01 Thread Mike Borgelt
At 07:50 PM 1/10/04 +1000, you wrote: At 05:23 PM 1/10/2004 +0930, you wrote: I received a flyer from CASA advising of a range of seminars, one of which is National Airspace. We should flock to this to make our point about the roll back. The following link has info about the seminars and

Re: [aus-soaring] Best sunglasses for gliding ?

2004-10-01 Thread Peter Creswick
Great fun. I did the same test in January. It felt a bit like being tested for a space flight flight. When I asked why he had invested the $10k plus in this bit of kit, he said that pretty soon this test will be mandatory for a number of jobs, but he declined to provide any further details,

Re: [Aus-soaring] [Fwd: National Airspace Seminars]

2004-10-01 Thread Mike Cleaver
I received a flyer from CASA advising of a range of seminars, one of which is National Airspace. We should flock to this to make our point about the roll back. The following link has info about the seminars and registering: http://www.casa.gov.au/hotopics/seminars/topics/nas.htm --- Leigh

[Aus-soaring] An Interesting Notam

2004-10-01 Thread skf1
NAV C2123/04 NOTAMN A) MELBOURNE FIR C2123/04 (NAV) 09270531 B) 0409280001 C) 0410031600 E) ACFT ARE ADVISED TO REMAIN CLEAR OF AN AREA WI 1NM RAD OF PSN 3202S 11542E DUE TO INCREASED SECURITY LEVELS UN-APPROVED FLIGHT IN THIS AREA WILL BE TREATED AS A THREAT TO SECURITY

RE: [Aus-soaring] An Interesting Notam

2004-10-01 Thread skf1
More of the same.My understanding of the Chicago Convention is that TRAs (the invisible curtain) can be placed round areas that require protection for National Security.Sandgropers is part of the US fleet in town for the weekend? NAV C2128/04 NOTAMN A) MELBOURNE FIR C2128/04 (NAV) 09270930