Peter and Mandy Temple wrote:
Whereas the normal visual field extends 50 degrees superiorly, 70 degrees
inferiorly, 90 degrees temporally and 60 degrees nasally. So it is
theoretically possible to have a peripheral field loss that would not show
up with central testing.
Hi Mandy,
With respect
At 06:12 PM 1/10/04 +0930, you wrote:
Latest on airspace from Bob Hall
Cheers
David
It seems this is a giant stuff up. Obviously there were elements in
Airservices who were preparing to rollback the NAS even before it got
implemented.
Given the extremely late send out of the NAS education
On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 17:23:10 +0930, you wrote:
I received a flyer from CASA advising of a range of seminars, one of
which is National Airspace.
We should flock to this to make our point about the roll back.
The following link has info about the seminars and registering:
At 05:23 PM 1/10/2004 +0930, you wrote:
I received a flyer from CASA advising of a range of seminars, one of which
is National Airspace.
We should flock to this to make our point about the roll back.
The following link has info about the seminars and registering:
At 07:50 PM 1/10/04 +1000, you wrote:
At 05:23 PM 1/10/2004 +0930, you wrote:
I received a flyer from CASA advising of a range of seminars, one of which
is National Airspace.
We should flock to this to make our point about the roll back.
The following link has info about the seminars and
At 07:50 PM 1/10/04 +1000, you wrote:
At 05:23 PM 1/10/2004 +0930, you wrote:
I received a flyer from CASA advising of a range of seminars, one of which
is National Airspace.
We should flock to this to make our point about the roll back.
The following link has info about the seminars and
Great fun. I did the same test in January. It felt a bit like being
tested for a space flight flight. When I asked why he had invested the
$10k plus in this bit of kit, he said that pretty soon this test will
be mandatory for a number of jobs, but he declined to provide any
further details,
I received a flyer from CASA advising of a range of seminars, one of which
is National Airspace.
We should flock to this to make our point about the roll back.
The following link has info about the seminars and registering:
http://www.casa.gov.au/hotopics/seminars/topics/nas.htm
--- Leigh
NAV C2123/04 NOTAMN
A) MELBOURNE FIR C2123/04 (NAV) 09270531
B) 0409280001 C) 0410031600
E) ACFT ARE ADVISED TO REMAIN
CLEAR OF AN AREA WI 1NM
RAD OF PSN 3202S 11542E DUE TO
INCREASED SECURITY LEVELS
UN-APPROVED FLIGHT IN THIS AREA
WILL BE TREATED
AS A THREAT TO SECURITY
More of the same.My understanding of the Chicago Convention is that TRAs (the invisible curtain) can be placed round areas that require protection for National Security.Sandgropers is part of the US fleet in town for the weekend? NAV C2128/04 NOTAMN A) MELBOURNE FIR C2128/04 (NAV) 09270930
10 matches
Mail list logo