Wayne Carter wrote:
> A recent layup at Adelaide airport (damn fog) had me hooked up
> wirelessly FOR FREE -thanks to Internode!
Darwin and Newcastle airport are in on it as well. We've been trying
Melbourne and Sydney, but I think they're still a bit to 1900's to
get the concept :-)
- mar
Free plug!
For those who still are having issues connecting to the www, go to
church city.
A recent layup at Adelaide airport (damn fog) had me hooked up
wirelessly FOR FREE -thanks to Internode!
Excellent idea and service, well done
Fly safe
Wayne Carter
You wouldn't expect a young pup to know that Nick :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick
Gilbert
Sent: Friday, 13 July 2007 3:18 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] 1.00 a/c reins
Jantar 1? You mean Jantar Standard?
Jantar 1 is a 19m flapped glider.
On 7/13/07, Adam Woolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Handicap system is reversed over here...
If an LS4 was 1.06 in Aus, I'd be flying it! Sadly though, they divide
their dist/speed by the handicap, where as in Australia w
Handicap system is reversed over here...
If an LS4 was 1.06 in Aus, I'd be flying it! Sadly though, they divide
their dist/speed by the handicap, where as in Australia we multiply
dist/speed by handicap given...
Hope this clears it up.
WPP
P.s. I thought the jantar scenario was strange also
89.56 m
I would rather play with condor than Microsoft flight sim.
Has any body tried the latest version of flight sim?
The last version of flight sim i had was 2000 and Gliding was never very
realistic.
On 6/28/07, Lucas James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://flightsimx.cyclops.amnesia.com.a
As per Wombat's post about wing loadings. The handicap
model depends on what lift / thermal model you choose. I
dare say that the italians have their own ideas about the
size, strength, spacing of their thermals. Alternatively
they may have based the h'caps with some consideration for
wave and/o
Astir standard. I presume that is a CS
DG 300 club 1,04
Pegase 1,04
Astir standard 1,00
ASW 19 1,00
DG 100 1,00
Hornet 1,00
Jantar standard 1,00
LS 1f 1,00
Phoebus c 1,00
ASW 15 0,98
ASW 19 0,98
Cirrus standard 0,98
DG 100 club 0,98
Libelle standard 0,98
> -Original Message-
> From: [EM
They are the Italian handicaps - i think that should be enough
explanation.
But, I could say the same of some of the handicaps in use here !
As to the Astir - Are you confusing the Speed Astir ? This is
definitely not the same as the Astir CS or 77 - it is a flapped
machine similar in perfo
The handicaps are peculiar. What are they based on?
An Astir with a higher handicap that a cirrus or ASW19?
A Jantar the same as an Astir?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:aus-soaring-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Woolley
> Sent: Friday, 13 July 2007 11:2
Perfect example why you would only take a Cirrus or another high performance
low handicap glider (1.00 - cirrus, LS1-f,ASW-19) to a club class worlds.
Have to work too hard in anything else! An LS4 is at 1.06..
http://www.aeccvv.it/Scoring/779_CI_Club2007.htm - 9 x 1.00 gliders (8 x
cirrus, 1
Fun? As much fun as writing an Excel based wing
loading calculator? =(
I've hit the wall at 95.21 metres ... damn you,
ceiling fan!
--- JR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Speaking of more fun,who has thrown the best
> distance with the paper plane?
> JR
> - Original Message -
> From:
12 matches
Mail list logo