Don't know how many tugs would conform either
-Cath
On 20/05/2010, at 3:49 PM, Tim Shirley wrote:
And by the way, a rule requiring a glider to be established on final at 500
ft could be used as an example in a dictionary definition of the word
"silly".
_
A friend not on this list and not much on the net has asked me to mention
his LS4 is for sale
*LS4 -great glider to fly (winglet ready but LS4 does not need them!!) with
All 57mm instruments -Cambridge 302/303 with PDA+Winter mini Alt, ASI and
vario, new bags, peddle mechanism etc all re bushed,
Tim,
I think your last paragraph says it all. This is
entirely supported by the following extract from
the EW MicroRecorder Manual, confirmed by a
physical inspection. From personal experience I
know that attempting to power a MicroRecorder via
a "Flarm cable" does unspeakable damage to the
Hi folks
The updated weekend weather forecast is available at
http://the-white-knight-speaks.blogspot.com
--
Robert Hart ha...@interweft.com.au
+61 (0)438 385 533 http://www.hart.wattle.id.au
___
All this seems to be the sensible advice - make the proper radio
calls and you can continue to use the low finish permission in CAO
95.4 (of which the straight-in is the most efficient use of airspace
and time), so long as you are not stuffing up other traffic by doing so.
If you know you have
At 06:14 PM 20/05/2010, you wrote:
No, provided you broadcast your intentions and give way to all / any circuit
traffic, who have right of way.
John H
Well, do they really when one aircraft is a glider and it is low and
trying to land?
Mike
Borgelt Instruments - manufacturers of quality s
Yes, you are missing something.
The IGC spec is actually a suggestion, not a requirement.
In order to provide all the EW functionality, all 8 wires on the
Ethernet RJ connector are used (yeah it isn't Ethernet either) and it
is impossible to comply with the IGC wiring standard.
Unfortunately
No, provided you broadcast your intentions and give way to all / any circuit
traffic, who have right of way.
John H
-Original Message-
From: aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net
[mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net] On Behalf Of Robinson,
Peter B (Information Systems)
So did they get fried as I described?
Were the batteries properly charged?
Were the various setup numbers properly entered in EWUser.txt?
What exactly doesn't work?
No record?
No GPs record?
You need to very carefully read the full instructions(available from
the EW website).
Mike
At 0
Hi Urs,
I'm also puzzled by this.
Since the EW flight recorder is an IGC approved device, it meets the IGC
specification and therefore any cable wired to this spec should work,
whether it was designed specifically for EW or for any other IGC approved
Flight Recorder.
As you correctly say, it is
At 03:50 PM 20/05/2010, you wrote:
Also I think all glider pilots should be aware the correct
procedure in the event of a radio failure at a certified or
registered airport (they now all require radio)
So what are the correct procedures? I haven't seen any in writing?
I It is not the norm
I have been using mine for about 3 years with no issues.
Cheers,
Richard McLean
--- On Thu, 20/5/10, Robert Hart wrote:
From: Robert Hart
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] TECHNICAL ALERT
To: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia."
Received: Thursday, 20 May, 2010, 2:52 PM
O
1) IGC Flight Recorder specifications require pin 1&2 and pin 7&8
on the RJ-45 connector of a IGC compliant cable to be in parallel...
http://www.fai.org/gliding/system/files/tech_spec_gnss.pdf#page=32
2) There is no such thing as a "FLARM cable" or "FLARM connector".
FLARM has never ship
On 20/05/10 16:17, Patching wrote:
My EW is the biggest piece of dud I have ever had. Its
been back 2 times to the manufacturer to be fixed and it still doesn't
work! Wasted $1200 on it. It now sits in the junk pile.
Not real happy about that. 2 out of the 3 we purchased don't work.
Int
14 matches
Mail list logo
