about the Pom stuff, i am sure they shower, England actually has
water to bathe in.
Mark
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:52:34
+Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] ACCIDENT INCIDENT REPORTING IN THE GFA
In the UK, a statistic was thrown around a few years ago
and learn from some valuable lessons from those who didn't finish there
flight as expected
Ben
- Original Message -
From: Mark Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] ACCIDENT INCIDENT REPORTING IN THE GFA
What I am suggesting is that those who believe that some
y area)where interested pilots and flying instructors couldtake and learn from some valuable lessons from those who didn't finish
thereflight as expected Ben- Original Message -From: "Mark Newton" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] ACCIDENT INCIDENT REP
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] ACCIDENT INCIDENT REPORTING IN THE GFA
In the UK, a statistic was thrown around a few years ago that 5 people a
year were killed by soft drinks vending machines and 4 people a year on
average died in glider accidents. I've been more careful retreiving my Diet
Coke ever
-
From: Gary
To: 'Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.'
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] ACCIDENT INCIDENT REPORTING IN THE GFA
Yeah Jim,
I like the bit about not rocking the machine. It might put a different SLANT
on things
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I understand your reasoning Mark.
And surely you aren't suggesting that less would be even better?
No, you're putting words in my mouth. The mere fact that you'd
entertain the possibility that that's what I'm suggesting is a bit
astonishing to me. What did I
2007 9:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] ACCIDENT INCIDENT REPORTING IN THE GFA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I understand your reasoning Mark.
And surely you aren't suggesting that less would be even better
Davis, Jo wrote:
Mark, it seems like you stopped writing just at the critical moment.
Your suggestions on how to make improvements in this area would be
warmly appreciated. What productive avenues did you have in mind?
I also said:
# It seems to me that training, currency, flexibility
#
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Newton
Sent: Thursday, 14 June 2007 9:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] ACCIDENT INCIDENT REPORTING IN THE GFA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I
battle to fight' if we
are to have that cycle of improvement going.
Jo
-Original Message-
From: Mark Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 14 June 2007 10:36 AM
To: Davis, Jo
Cc: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] ACCIDENT
Geoff Kidd wrote:
At the risk of being railed against again by the You only want the
gory details mob, I ask whether any of you have considered Kevin's
article on P22 of the June 2007 Soaring Australia, and whether you
consider it a little incongruous.
At the end of para 1 Kevin mentions
John,
Thanks for replying, and I can understand your point about the fatals, and
while I don't agree, let's leave those for a minute . although surely they
are almost automatically the most important from which to learn. However having
said that.
Please consider, as examples only, the 3
Geoff Kidd wrote:
With the greatest respect, John, I say that the HGFA's examination is of
untold greater benefit to its members.
Surely if that was true then intermediately-experienced HGFA members
would stop launching on turbulent ridges on blustery days? It's almost
like every second
I think I understand your reasoning Mark.
And surely you aren't suggesting that less would be even better?
Tell me. Are you totally satisfied with the way these items are reported by us?
Are you satisfied that all accidents and incidents, of which the GFA are aware,
are being reported to
]
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 9:54 PM
Subject: [Aus-soaring] ACCIDENT INCIDENT REPORTING IN THE GFA
What a terrifically safe sport we have. We don't appear to have any
accidents ... and even incidents don't
Mc Donnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 8:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] ACCIDENT INCIDENT REPORTING IN THE GFA
Also re reporting:
I was so impressed with the simplicity, candour
And at Gliding Qld.'s recent AGM and is going to be implemented by GFA in
the near future.
PeterS
- Original Message -
From: jorgie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] ACCIDENT INCIDENT REPORTING
17 matches
Mail list logo
