On 23/12/03 12:50 AM, "Jim Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone any idea what proportion of Australian gliding pilots
> actually lurk here? It is a great shame if pilots were not aware of
> it's existence.
Current list membership count is 296.
> Perhaps an article in the mag would be
Well, it's like this. Although I'd have to agree on a % basis that the
content of AG was of more interest to glider pilots than the current
magazine, there's also sufficient gliding content there now to keep me
reading it quite happily and occasionally I find the other stuff of
interest too -
Leigh Youdale wrote:
The answer for you, and others who think as you
do, is simple. Start your own gliding magazine and if you're right you
will be flooded with subscriptions. Otherwise, bag it! We've heard it
all before and most of us are sick of it. Move on.
What an inter
;
To: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] RE: AG
| Andrew, I know how you feel, I too awaited with keen anticipation
the
| arrival of AG and it was read from cover to cover
ROTECTED]>
To: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 7:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] RE: AG
> The answer for you, and others who think as you do, is simple. Start
> your own gliding magazine and if
The answer for you, and others who think as you do, is simple. Start
your own gliding magazine and if you're right you will be flooded with
subscriptions. Otherwise, bag it! We've heard it all before and most of
us are sick of it. Move on.
Leigh Youdale
On Sunday, Dec 21, 2003, at 21:05 Austral
Shame on you, Bob
This comment is not worthy of your past level of contributions to our sport
of SOARING in all its forms!
Time marches on, and the people who pursue our activity using different
technology are no less worthy than the pioneers of sailplanes - many of
them were members of the sa
Andrew, I know how you feel, I too awaited with keen anticipation the
arrival of AG and it was read from cover to cover on the same night. What a
difference. The "thing " we get now is consigned to the WPB without opening
and there are many other folk who do the same. We are doing a fine job of
su
Mark Newton wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:53:48PM +1030, Dav wrote:
> As to Marks question re gliding only it is self evident that should
> the mag be sailplanes only then people who edit would at least know
> which glider is which-and lets face it over half the mag no longer
> r
You got it in one Mark!!!
Try being the President of the largest Gliding Club in Australia (arguably)
Not many volunteers :-(
/daveb
Mark Newton wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:53:48PM +1030, Dav wrote:
> As to Marks question re gliding only it is self evident that should
> the mag be sailplan
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:53:48PM +1030, Dav wrote:
> As to Marks question re gliding only it is self evident that should
> the mag be sailplanes only then people who edit would at least know
> which glider is which-and lets face it over half the mag no longer
> relates to gliding BUT IT IS
ehttp://www.uniformtime.com.au
PO Box 114 INDOOROOPILLY QLD 4068Ph: 07 3371 2944 Fax: 07 3870 4103
- Original Message -
From:
Dav
To: Discussion of issues relating
to Soaring in Australia.
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 5:23
PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] RE: AG
ginal Message -
From:
Brian
Wade
To: Discussion of issues relating
to Soaring in Australia.
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:19
PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] RE: AG
I think Dave is being just bloody minded!
The quality of the magazine is very much dependant o
elating to Soaring in Australia."
To: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: [Aus-soaring] RE: AG
Hi all
It would be nice to think that SOMEONE at the editorial secti
>
> Uniform Time
> http://www.uniformtime.com.au
>
> PO Box 114 INDOOROOPILLY QLD 4068
> Ph: 07 3371 2944 Fax: 07 3870 4103
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Dav
> To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
> Sent: Monday, D
To: Discussion of issues relating
to Soaring in Australia.
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 6:35
PM
Subject: [Aus-soaring] RE: AG
Hi all
It would be nice to think that SOMEONE at the
editorial section of AG could tell the difference between a Libelle and an LS1
wouldn
I'm not trying to pick a fight or anything, I have a genuine serious
question:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 07:05:58PM +1030, Dav wrote:
> However it is probably not going to get any better until it is once
> more solely a sailplane magazine.
Upon what basis do you arrive at that suspicion?
Seriou
Hi all
It would be nice to think that SOMEONE at the
editorial section of AG could tell the difference between a Libelle and an LS1
wouldn't it?
I mean I noticed straight away the moment I opened
the article, the lack of a T-Tail is a dead give away if you know giders which
it seems no-
18 matches
Mail list logo
