Re: [aus-soaring] CAUTION about Cross modal fatality rates + BOLD STATEMENTS

2003-06-28 Thread hartr
On 20 Jun, Dav wrote: > 1. when I started gliding (In 1980)I knew I was doing something > dangerous, and I accept there are risks and they are a large part of > the pleasure of flying gliders for me. I think you need to be very careful about how you say this. I hope that what you mean is that the

Re: [aus-soaring] CAUTION about Cross modal fatality rates + BOLD STATEMENTS

2003-06-24 Thread Peter Stephenson
I call it McDonalds flying. (fast food). PeterS > since the 1970,s with a few peaks of interest. It may be a simple as there > are many choices were one can spend there discretionary income, and the "I > wont it NOW syndrome !!!" > > Deborah Fanning > - Original Message - > -- * You ar

Re: [aus-soaring] CAUTION about Cross modal fatality rates + BOLD STATEMENTS

2003-06-24 Thread Deborah Fanning
raft and go. > No-one else is needed. > Cheers, John G. > > - Original Message - > From: "Dav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 8:16 PM > Subject: Re: [aus-soaring] CAUTION about Cross modal > fat

Re: [aus-soaring] CAUTION about Cross modal fatality rates + BOLD STATEMENTS

2003-06-24 Thread John Giddy
ts score over us. You can just go to the airfield, check out your aircraft and go. No-one else is needed. Cheers, John G. - Original Message - From: "Dav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [aus-soaring] CA

Re: [aus-soaring] CAUTION about Cross modal fatality rates + BOLD STATEMENTS

2003-06-24 Thread Dav
y" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 5:00 PM Subject: Re: [aus-soaring] CAUTION about Cross modal fatality rates + BOLD STATEMENTS > > - Original Message - > From: "Dav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: &l

Re: [aus-soaring] CAUTION about Cross modal fatality rates + BOLD STATEMENTS

2003-06-20 Thread John Giddy
- Original Message - From: "Dav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:06 PM Subject: Re: [aus-soaring] CAUTION about Cross modal fatality rates + BOLD STATEMENTS | Hi Guys, <<< other items snipped >>> | | 5

Re: [aus-soaring] CAUTION about Cross modal fatality rates + BOLD STATEMENTS

2003-06-19 Thread Dav
t; To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:26 AM Subject: Re: [aus-soaring] CAUTION about Cross modal fatality rates + BOLD STATEMENTS > Looks like a very solid basis for an excellent Aus Soaring article > Michael. Hope you could see your way clear to refining it for that

Re: [aus-soaring] CAUTION about Cross modal fatality rates + BOLD STATEMENTS

2003-06-19 Thread Dion Weston
Looks like a very solid basis for an excellent Aus Soaring article Michael. Hope you could see your way clear to refining it for that broader audience. On Wednesday, Jun 18, 2003, at 15:15 Australia/Sydney, Michael Texler wrote: Hi All, Upon more detailed analysis of the data. "There are lie

Re: [aus-soaring] CAUTION about Cross modal fatality rates + BOLD STATEMENTS

2003-06-17 Thread ANDREW WRIGHT
WOW. I did Statistics 1 at Uni but never did this stuff. Good work Micheal. > Hi All, > > Upon more detailed analysis of the data. > > "There are lies and damned statistics!" > > In summary: > > THE MEDIAN FATALITY RATES OF GLIDING AND DRIVING ARE NOT SIGNIFICANTLY > DIFFERENT > >

Re: [aus-soaring] CAUTION about Cross modal fatality rates +BOLD STATEMENTS

2003-06-17 Thread Derek Ruddock
I did read it! the folowing statement is interesting: "Using parametric statistics leads to the conclusion that gliding has higher average death rates than gliding " Oops a little finger trouble perhaps ... >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 18/06/03 15:15:08 >>> Hi All, Upon more detailed analysis of the d

[aus-soaring] CAUTION about Cross modal fatality rates + BOLD STATEMENTS

2003-06-17 Thread Michael Texler
Hi All, Upon more detailed analysis of the data. "There are lies and damned statistics!" In summary: THE MEDIAN FATALITY RATES OF GLIDING AND DRIVING ARE NOT SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT THE FATALITY RATE PER 100,000 MEMBERS HAS A SIMILAR DISTRIBUTION IN BOTH GROUPS FATALITY RATES PER 100,000 HOUR