>
>
>So you can p--- off any time and see how you get supervised & charged by
>CASA.
>
Thanks for the info, could prove to be very useful.
However the kicker is that you still have to abide by the GFA
regulations which means
a) that undoubtably they say that you have to be a member of the GFA a
ere...
Andrew.
> -Original Message-
> From: John Welsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, 31 May 2002 23:19
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [aus-soaring] Proposed New Rules: Pilot Licensing
>
>
> Peter, you don't have to be a member of GF
At 10:05 PM 31/05/02 +1000, you wrote:
>And quite sadly the GFA has decided to stay in the dark ages and fight this
>proposal tooth and nail (see June Aus soaring mag). Everyday GFA just
>becomes
>more and more irrelevant. Over the last few years CASA has shown itself by
>it's actions to be quite
Peter, you don't have to be a member of GFA, you can arrange for CASA to
supervise you to agreed standards, to quote CAO 95.4:-
4.1 An aircraft to which this Section applies shall not be operated
except:
(a) by an individual who is a member of the GFA, or an organisation
which is
affiliated with
And quite sadly the GFA has decided to stay in the dark ages and fight this
proposal tooth and nail (see June Aus soaring mag). Everyday GFA just
becomes
more and more irrelevant. Over the last few years CASA has shown itself by
it's actions to be quite progressive and not the evil bureaucracy th
o go there.
SDF
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Giddy
Sent: Friday, 31 May 2002 17:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [aus-soaring] Proposed New Rules: Pilot Licensing
I think you mean the "General Flying Pr
At 04:48 PM 31/05/02 +1000, you wrote:
>Mike,
>I asked a similar question when I first saw the proposal for the
>recreational pilots license, and it was suggested to me that
>recreational license holders who wanted/needed to fly aircraft larger than
>allowed on the recreational license cou
PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 4:48 PM
Subject: RE: [aus-soaring] Proposed New Rules: Pilot
Licensing
| Slightly off the thread wasn't the (R) PPL replaced by
something else some
| years ago, and the PPL issued on completion of the
| successful completion of the navigation traini
ation training?
SDF
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Borgelt
Sent: Friday, 31 May 2002 16:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [aus-soaring] Proposed New Rules: Pilot Licensing
At 01:27 PM 31/05/02 +1000, you wrote:
>A
At 01:27 PM 31/05/02 +1000, you wrote:
>Are there any clubs out there that use pilots with a restricted PPL to
perform aerotows?
>If you are using a Pawnee or similar. you will be affected by the
replacement of the Restricted PPL with the new Recreational PPL then the
new regs come into effect:
>
> If you are using a Pawnee or similar. you will be affected by the
> replacement of the Restricted PPL with the new Recreational PPL then
> the new regs come into effect:
Will it replace the rules for existing RPPLs?
> b) in the case of powered aircraft, have a maximum piston-engine power
> no
11 matches
Mail list logo
