Equals pretty much anything they want
Paul
On 14 Aug 2018, at 2:59 pm, Chris Ford wrote:
>> I hate to be the ones COMPLIMENTING the Gumbyment, but it's nowhere near
>> as bad as I thought they were going to make it. It looks like they've
>> actually
>> spoken to some people who udnerstand
> I hate to be the ones COMPLIMENTING the Gumbyment, but it's nowhere near
> as bad as I thought they were going to make it. It looks like they've actually
> spoken to some people who udnerstand crypto.
Read the new Section 317E Listed Acts or Things (page 16 of the exposure
draft). It lists
Guys,
Any IINET MTA onlist? We have a customers site who is unable to access
pop.netspace.net.au on 110
tia
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> Force a developer to modify the app
Most app developers are not under Australian jurisdictions. Especially
so for app developers who specialize in dark-web comms.
With 20+ million programmers out there, it's not that hard to find
someone to develop an app that is immune to Australian
I'm sure nothing could go wrong there...
A
On 14 August 2018 at 14:11, Mark Andrews wrote:
> A quick reading of the exposure bill would allow for a scenario like this:
>
> Force a developer to modify the app to send a encrypted copy of the
> traffic to
> a given address and to issue a new
A quick reading of the exposure bill would allow for a scenario like this:
Force a developer to modify the app to send a encrypted copy of the traffic to
a given address and to issue a new version triggering a “update available”
notification.
Force the store to return the modified version of
I think it’s easy to read this, just re-read the bollocks that we have already
had to comply with and it should match pretty close.
The summary I get from it is that they can’t access encrypted stuff now so they
want everybody to make it so they can, but they can’t say that they will force
My reading isn't as positive. tl;dr - it's too vague and open to
intepretation.
>From the Explanatory Document (
https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/consultations/Documents/explanatory-document.pdf
):
" Allow the Attorney-General to issue a technical capability notice,
requiring a designated
I hate to be the ones COMPLIMENTING the Gumbyment, but it's nowhere
near as bad as I thought they were going to make it. It looks like
they've actually spoken to some people who udnerstand crypto.
The important bits seem to be on Pages 8 and 9 here -
https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about/consultations/assistance-and-access-bill-2018
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
Only if you use lemon-scented fabric softener.
- mark
> On 13 Aug 2018, at 10:32 pm, Tom Storey wrote:
>
> The ironing is delicious.
>
>> On 1 August 2018 at 01:36, Mark Newton wrote:
>> I’m almost delighted to see Telstra experiencing the same frustrating issues
>> with wholesalers
The ironing is delicious.
On 1 August 2018 at 01:36, Mark Newton wrote:
> I’m almost delighted to see Telstra experiencing the same frustrating
> issues with wholesalers that everyone else has been forced to deal with for
> the last 20 years :D
>
> - mark
Would my DC provider (NextDC) have any issues with me using the ATS linked
above. Trying to get our provider supply dual power supply NTU is becoming
a hassle.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 4:08 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe IT) <
r...@latrobeit.com.au> wrote:
> Thanks for that
> I’m thinking faulty unit
>
>
Thanks for that
I'm thinking faulty unit
Sent from my iPhone
On 13 Aug 2018, at 5:51 pm, Brad Peczka
mailto:b...@bradpeczka.com>> wrote:
I run a fleet of the APC ATSes - some of which are coming on 10 years service -
with no noted issues beyond some caveats in the firmware update process.
I run a fleet of the APC ATSes - some of which are coming on 10 years service -
with no noted issues beyond some caveats in the firmware update process.
In the absence of details on the error the UPSes threw, the original issue
sounds like a faulty device.
Eaton are a good alternative but
Hi Rhys,
We run a number (~6 or so) of the APC ATS' for some of our critical (but only 1
PSU) gear with no issues.
We did however have one that was faulty from new that switched between A
feeds a bit randomly and was replaced because there was no reason it should
have been switching.
Have you
We've got several of these running with no issues for the last few years.
https://cdlnz.com/RP-ATS
Sounds like you've had a run of bad luck with yours.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 13/08/2018, at 6:22 PM, Joseph Goldman wrote:
>
> Kind of defeats the purpose, as that re-introduces single power
Kind of defeats the purpose, as that re-introduces single power feed
loss - the idea of the ATS (im guessing on Rhys' behalf) was to make a
single PSU device 'dual power' by means of having it powered off dual feeds.
Kind Regards,
Joseph Goldman
APCS_Logo
Joseph Goldman | Network Manager /
18 matches
Mail list logo
